No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Ralph G. Steinhardt
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- The Chevron-Ecuador Dispute: A Paradigm of Complexity
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012
References
1 Chevron Corp. & Texaco Petroleum Co. v. Republic of Ecuador, PCA Case No. 2009-23 [hereinafter PCA Arbitration].
2 Republic of Ecuador v. Chevron Corp., 638 F.3d 384 (2d Cir. 2011).
3 PCA Arbitration, supra note 1, para. 4.60.
4 Chevron Corp. v. Naranjo, 667 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 2012).
5 N.Y.C.P.L.R. §§ 5301-5309.
6 Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc., 142 F. Supp. 2d 534, 537 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).
7 Republic of Ecuador v. Chevron Corp., 638 F.3d at 390.
8 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell, No. 10-491.
9 See Romero v. Drummond Co., 552 F.3d 1303, 1315 (11th Cir. 2008); John Doe VIII et al. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 654 F.3d 11 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Flomo v. Firestone Nat. Rubber Co., Llc, 643 F.3d 1013 (7th Cir. 2011); Sarei v. Rio Tinto, Plc, Nos. 02-56256, 02-56390, 09-56381, 2011 WL 5041927 (9th Cir. Oct. 25, 2011).
10 Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428, 438 (1989).
11 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).
12 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995).
13 542 U.S. 692 (2004).