Skip to main content
Log in

Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition

  • Theoretical and Review Articles
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we bring together recent findings from developmental science and cognitive neuroscience to argue that perception-action coupling constitutes the fundamental mechanism of motor cognition. A variety of empirical evidence suggests that observed and executed actions are coded in a common cognitive and neural framework, enabling individuals to construct shared representations of self and other actions. We review work to suggest that such shared representations support action anticipation, organization, and imitation. These processes, along with additional computational mechanisms for determining a sense of agency and behavioral regulation, form the fabric of social interaction. In addition, humans possess the capacity to move beyond these basic aspects of action analysis to interpret behavior at a deeper level, an ability that may be outside the scope of the mirror system. Understanding the nature of shared representations from the vantage point of developmental and cognitive science and neuroscience has the potential to inform a range of motor and social processes. This perspective also elucidates intriguing new directions and research questions and generates specific hypotheses regarding the impact of early disorders (e.g., developmental movement disorders) on subsequent action processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnetta, B., &Rochat, P. (2004). Imitative games by 9-, 14-, and 18-month-old infants.Infancy,6, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G., &Courchesne, E. (2003). Differential effects of developmental cerebellar abnormality on cognitive and motor functions in the cerebellum: An fMRI study of autism.American Journal of Psychiatry,160, 262–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, R. A., Essick, G. K., &Siegel, R. M. (1985). Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons.Science,230, 456–458.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asendorpf, J. B., Warkentin, V., &Baudonniere, P. (1988). Selfawareness and other-awareness: II. Mirror self-recognition, social contingency awareness, and synchronic imitation.Developmental Psychology,32, 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avikainen, S., Kulomaki, T., &Hari, R. (1999). Normal movement reading in Asperger subjects.NeuroReport,26, 3467–3470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. A., &Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Making sense of human behavior: Action parsing and intentional inferences. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.),Intentions and intentionality (pp. 193–206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., &Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action.Child Development,72, 708–717.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995).Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 577–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system.Language & Cognitive Processes,18, 513–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A. K., &Ruppert, J. A. (2003). Social embodiment. In B. H. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol.43, pp. 43–92). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., &Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7, 84–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, K., &Wellman, H. M. (1995).Children talk about the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedon, B. G., &Howard, D. V. (1992). Memory for the frequency of occurrence of karate techniques: A comparison of experts and novices.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,30, 117–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., &Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi, G., &Aglioti, S. (1997). The body in the brain: Neural bases of corporeal awareness.Trends in Neurosciences,20, 560–564.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. S., &Springer, K. (1993). Structure, motion and preschoolers’ perception of causality.Ecological Psychology,5, 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S. J., &Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2, 561–567.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S. J., &Frith, C. D. (2005). The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action.Neuropsychologia,43, 260–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, O., Landis, T., Spinelli, L., &Seeck, M. (2004). Out-ofbody experience and autoscopy of neurological origin.Brain,127, 243–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, O., Ortigue, S., Landis, T., &Seeck, M. (2002). Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions.Nature,419, 269–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, M., Bekkering, H., &Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task.Acta Psychologica,106, 3–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., &Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues.Brain & Cognition,44, 124–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., &Riggio, L. (2001). The mirror neuron system and action recognition.Brain & Language,89, 370–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Pastteri, I., Lagravinese, G., Benuzzi, F., et al. (2004). Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: An fMRI study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,16, 114–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buccino, G., Vogt, S., Ritzl, A., Fink, G. R., Zilles, K., Freund, H. J., &Rizzolatti, G. (2004). Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study.Neuron,22, 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. W. (2003). Imitation as behaviour parsing.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,358, 529–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. W. (2005). Social cognition: Imitation, imitation, imitation.Current Biology,15, R498-R500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., &Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers.Cerebral Cortex,15, 1243–1249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M., Call, J., &Tomasello, M. (2002). Understanding “prior intentions” enables two-year-olds to imitatively learn a complex task.Child Development,73, 1431–1441.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M., Call, J., &Tomasello, M. (2005). Twelve- and 18-month-olds copy actions in terms of goals.Developmental Science,8, F13-F20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M.-C., Mazziotta, J. C., &Lenzi, G. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,100, 5497–5502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello, U. (2003). Understanding other people’s actions: Intention and attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 416–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello, U., Lusher, D., Mari, M., Edwards, M., &Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Observing a human or a robotic hand grasping an object: Differential motor priming effects. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.),Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 315–333). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaminade, T., &Decety, J. (2002). Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency.NeuroReport,13, 1975–1978.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaminade, T., Meary, D., Orliaguet, J. P., &Decety, J. (2001). Is perceptual anticipation a motor simulation? A PET study.NeuroReport,12, 3669–3674.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaminade, T., Meltzoff, A. N., &Decety, J. (2002). Does the end justify the means? A PET exploration of the mechanisms involved in human imitation.NeuroImage,15, 318–328.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, L. L., &Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable manmade objects in the dorsal stream.NeuroImage,12, 478–484.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, T. L., &Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,76, 893–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiron, C., Jambaque, J., Nabbout, R., Lounes, R., Syrota, A., &Dulac, O. (1997). The right brain hemisphere is dominant in human infants.Brain,120, 1057–1065.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiron, C., Raynaud, C., Mazière, B., Zilbovicius, M., Laflamme, L., Masure, M. C., et al. (1992). Changes in regional cerebral blood flow during brain maturation in children and adolescents.Journal of Nuclear Medicine,33, 696–703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S., Tremblay, F., &Ste-Marie, D. (2004). Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions.Neuropsychologia,42, 105–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, L. J., Keen, R., &McCarty, M. E. (2003). Evidence of motor planning in infant reaching behavior.Psychological Science,14, 354–356.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collie, R., &Hayne, H. (1999). Deferred imitation by 6- and 9-monthold infants: More evidence for declarative memory.Developmental Psychobiology,35, 83–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courchesne, E., Yeung-Courchesne, R., Press, R., Hesseline, J. R., &Jernigan, T. L. (1988). Hypoplasia of cerebellar vermal lobules VI and VII in autism.New England Journal of Medicine,318, 1349–1354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade, R. (1987). A folk model of the mind. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.),Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 112–148). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J. (1996). The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery.Behavioural Brain Research,77, 45–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J. (in press). A cognitive neuroscience view of imitation. In S. J. Rogers & J. H. G. Williams (Eds.), Imitation and the social mind: Autism and typical development. New York: Guilford.

  • Decety, J., Chaminade, T., Grèzes, J., &Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation.NeuroImage,15, 265–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., Grèzes, J., Costes, N., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., et al. (1997). Brain activity during observation of action: Influence of action content and subject’s strategy.Brain,120, 1763–1777.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., &Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy.Behavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews,3, 71–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., Durozard, D., &Baverel, G. (1993). Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man.Journal of Physiology,461, 549–563.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., Germain, M., &Pastene, J. (1991). Vegetative response during imagined movement is proportional to mental effort.Behavioural Brain Research,42, 1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., &Sommerville, J. A. (2003). Shared representations between self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,12, 527–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget, M., &Grafton, S. (2003). Feedback or feedforward control: End of a dichotomy. In S. H. Johnson-Frey (Ed.),Taking action: Cognitive neuroscience perspectives on intentional acts (pp. 289–338). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (2000). Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex.Child Development,71, 44–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dominey, P. F., Decety, J., Broussolle, E., Chazot, G., &Jeannerod, M. (1995). Motor imagery of a lateralized sequential task is asymmetrically slowed in hemi-Parkinson’s patients.Neuropsychologia,33, 727–741.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrsson, H. H., Geyer, S., &Naito, E. (2003). Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes and tongue activates corresponding bodypart-specific motor representations.Journal of Neurophysiology,90, 3304–3316.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., &Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study.European Journal of Neuroscience,15, 399–402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falkman, K. W., Sandberg, A. D., &Hjelmquist, E. (2004). Theory of mind in children with cerebral palsy and severe speech impairment.Göteberg Psychological Reports,34, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Frith, C. D., Decety, J., &Jeannerod, M. (2003). Modulating agency: A PET study.NeuroImage,18, 324–333.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrer, C., &Frith, C. D. (2002). Experiencing oneself vs. another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency.NeuroImage,15, 596–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fecteau, S., Carmant, L., Tremblay, C., Robert, M., Bouthillier, A., &Théoret, H. (2004). A motor resonance mechanism in children? Evidence from subdural electrodes in a 36-month-old child.Neuro-Report,15, 2625–2627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, T. (1995). Infants of depressed mothers.Infant Behavior & Development,18, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipek, P. A., Semrud-Clikeman, M., Steingard, R. J., Renshaw, P. F., Kennedy, D. N., &Beiderman, J. (1997). Volumetric MRI analysis comparing subjects having attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with normal controls.Neurology,48, 589–601.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. R., &Johansson, R. S. (2003). Action plans used in action observation.Nature,424, 769–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., &Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding.Science,308, 662–667.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, D. R., Aksan, N., &Kochanska, G. (2004). Toddlers’ responsive imitation predicts preschool-age conscience.Psychological Science,15, 699–704.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U., &Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,358, 459–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuster, J. M. (1997).The prefrontal cortex. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., Ferrari, P. F., Kohler, E., &Fogassi, L. (2002). The eyes, the hand, and the mind: Behavioral and neurophysiological aspects of social cognition. In M. Bekoff, C. Allen, & G. M. Burghardt (Eds.),The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition (pp. 451–461). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., &Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2, 493–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., Keysers, C., &Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 396–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., &Király, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants.Nature,415, 755.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, S., Matelli, M., Luppino, G., &Zilles, K. (2000). Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system.Anatomy & Embryology,202, 443–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1966).The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., et al. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study.Nature Neuroscience,2, 861–863.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F., Lane, P. C. R., Croker, S., Cheng, G. J., Oliver, I., &Pine, J. M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,5, 236–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F., &Simon, H. A. (2000). Five seconds or sixty? Presentation time in expert memory.Cognitive Science,24, 651–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. I. (2002). Simulation theory and mental concepts. In J. Dokic & J. Proust (Eds.),Simulation and knowledge of action (pp. 2–19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., &Astington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction.Child Development,59, 26–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation.Mind & Language,1, 158–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, G. (1992).Individual development and evolution: The genesis of novel behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, S. T., Arbib, M. A., Fadiga, L., &Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography.Experimental Brain Research,112, 103–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grèzes, J., Armony, J. L., Rowe, J., &Passingham, R. E. (2003). Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: An fMRI study.NeuroImage,18, 928–937.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grèzes, J., Costes, N., &Decety, J. (1998). Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: A PET investigation.Cognitive Neuropsychology,15, 553–582.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grèzes, J., &Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A metaanalysis.Human Brain Mapping,12, 1–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grèzes, J., &Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study.Neuropsychologia,40, 212–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grèzes, J., Frith, C. D., &Passingham, R. E. (2004). Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: An fMRI study.Neuro-Image,21, 744–750.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A., Wolpert, D., &Frith, U. (2004). Your own action influences how you perceive another person’s action.Current Biology,14, 493–498.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamzei, F., Rijntjes, M., Dettmers, C., Glauche, V., Weiller, C., &Büchel, C. (2003). The human action recognition system and its relationship to Broca’s area: An fMRI study.NeuroImage,19, 637–644.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., Briskman, J., &Frith, U. (2001). Exploring the cognitive phenotype of autism: Weak “central coherence” in parents and siblings of children with autism. I: Experimental tests.Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines,42, 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., Brownell, H., &Winner, E. (1999). Acquired “theory of mind” impairments following stroke.Cognition,70, 211–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hari, R., Forss, N., Avikainen, S., Kirveskari, E., Salenius, S., &Rizzolatti, G. (1998). Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: A neuromagnetic study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,95, 15061–15065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L. (1989).Children and emotion: The development of psychological understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayne, H., Boniface, J., &Barr, R. (2000). The development of declarative memory in human infants: Age-related changes in deferred imitation.Behavioral Neuroscience,114, 77–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J. (1998). Co-cognition and off-line simulation: Two ways of understanding the simulation approach.Mind & Language,13, 477–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, H., Vogt, S., &Prinz, W. (2001). Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: A case for action-perception transfer.Psychological Research,65, 3–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F., &Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior.American Journal of Psychology,57, 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, R. P., &Lee, A. (1999). Imitation and identification in autism.Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry,40, 649–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 494–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., &Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 849–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., &Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system.Public Library of Science Biology,3, e79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., &Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation.Science,286, 2526–2528.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. L., Brunet, E., Meltzoff, A. N., &Decety, J. (2006). Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain.Neuropsychologia,44, 752–761.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, P., &Jeannerod, M. (2004). The motor theory of social cognition: A critique.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A., &Shiffrar, M. (2005). Walking perception by walking observers.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järveläinen, J., Schürmann, M., &Hari, R. (2004). Activation of the human primary motor cortex during observation of tool use.Neuro-Image,23, 187–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 187–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1999). To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition.NeuroImage,14, S103-S109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (2003). The mechanism of self-recognition in human.Behavioural Brain Research,142, 1–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jellema, T., Baker, C. I., Wicker, B., &Perrett, D. I. (2000). Neural representation for the perception of the intentionality of actions.Brain & Cognition,44, 280–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H. (1997).Developmental cognitive neuroscience: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H. (2000). Functional brain development in infants: Elements of an interactive specialization framework.Child Development,71, 75–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H., &Morton, J. (1991).Biology & cognitive development: The case of face recognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Frey, S. H., McCarty, M. E., &Keen, R. (2004). Reaching beyond spatial perception: Effects of intended future actions on visually guided prehension.Visual Cognition,11, 371–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keysers, C., &Perrett, D. I. (2004). Demystifying social cognition: A Hebbian perspective.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 501–507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., &Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action.Current Biology,13, 522–525.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner, J. M., Vargas, C., Duval, S., Blakemore, S. J., &Sirigu, A. (2004). Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement.Nature Neuroscience,7, 1299–1301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsbourne, M. (2002). The role of imitation in body ownership and mental growth. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.),The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 311–330). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich, G., &Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action.Psychological Science,12, 467–472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich, G., &Flach, R. (2003). Action identity: Evidence from self-recognition, prediction, and coordination.Consciousness & Cognition,12, 620–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich, G., &Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1006–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., &Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons.Science,297, 846–848.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krams, M., Rushworth, M. F. S., Deiber, M. P., Frackowiak, R. S. J., &Passingham, R. E. (1998). The preparation, execution and suppression of copied movements.Experimental Brain Research,120, 386–398.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kugiumutzakis, G. (1993). Intersubjective vocal imitation in early mother—infant interaction. In J. Nadel & L. Camioni (Eds.),New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 23–47). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugiumutzakis, G. (1999). Neonatal imitation in the intersubjective companion space. In S. Bråten (Ed.),Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny: Studies in emotion and social interaction (pp. 63–88). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legerstee, M. (1991). The role of person and object in eliciting early imitation.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,51, 423–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, K. R., Johnson-Frey, S. H., &Grafton, S. T. (2004). Functional imaging of face and hand imitation: Towards a motor theory of empathy.NeuroImage,21, 601–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lhermitte, F., Pillon, B., &Serdaru, M. (1986). Human autonomy and the frontal lobes: Part I. Imitation and utilization behavior: A neuropsychological study of 75 patients.Annals of Neurology,19, 326–334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, K., Suzuki, W., &Tanaka, K. (2004). Neuronal correlates of goal-based motor selection in the prefrontal cortex.Science,301, 229–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N. (1990). Towards a developmental cognitive science: The implications of cross-modal matching and imitation for the devel opment of representation and memory in infancy.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,608, 1–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Reenactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children.Developmental Psychology,31, 838–850.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N., &Decety, J. (2003). What imitation tells us about social cognition: A rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,358, 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N., &Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates.Science,198, 75–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N., &Moore, M. K. (1994). Imitation, memory, and the representation of persons.Infant Behavior & Development,17, 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostofsky, S. H., Reiss, A. L., Lockhart, P., &Denckla, M. B. (1998). Evaluation of cerebellar size in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.Journal of Child Neurology,13, 434–439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müsseler, J., &Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 861–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, J. (2002). Some reasons to link imitation and imitation recognition to theory of mind. In J. Dokic & J. Proust (Eds.),Simulation and knowledge of action (pp. 119–135). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagell, K., Olguin, R. S., &Tomasello, M. (1993). Processes of social learning in the tool use of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens).Journal of Comparative Psychology,107, 174–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1991). Two perceptually given aspects of the self and their development.Developmental Review,11, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newtson, D., &Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,12, 436–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, N., Avikainen, S., &Hari, R. (2004). Abnormal imitationrelated cortical activation sequences in Asperger’s syndrome.Annals of Neurology,55, 558–562.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, N., &Hari, R. (2000). Temporal dynamics of cortical representation of action.Neurobiology,97, 913–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, N., &Hari, R. (2002). Viewing lip forms: Cortical dynamics.Neuron,36, 1211–1220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orliaguet, J. P., Kandel, S., &Boe, L. J. (1997). Visual perception of motor anticipation in cursive handwriting: Influence of spatial and movement information on the prediction of forthcoming letters.Perception,26, 905–912.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paccalin, C., &Jeannerod, M. (2000). Changes in breathing during observation of effortful actions.Brain Research,862, 194–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., &Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perani, D., Fazio, F., Borghese, N. A., Tettamanti, M., Ferrari, S., Decety, J., &Gilardi, M. C. (2001). Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions.NeuroImage,14, 749–758.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Harries, M. H., Bevan, R., Thomas, S., Benson, P. J., Mistlin, A. J., et al. (1989). Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions.Journal of Experimental Biology,146, 87–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. T., Wellman, H. M., &Spelke, E. (2002). Infants’ ability to connect eye gaze and emotional expression to intentional action.Cognition,85, 53–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, D. J. (2000).Folk physics for apes: The chimpanzee’s theory of how the world works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. D., &de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,25, 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,9, 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (2003). Experimental approaches to action. In J. Roessler & N. Eilan (Eds.),Agency and self-awareness (pp. 175–187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramnani, N., &Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others.Nature Neuroscience,7, 85–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raos, V., Evangeliou, M. N., &Savaki, H. F. (2004). Observation of action: Grasping with the mind’s hand.NeuroImage,23, 193–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C. L., &Farah, M. J. (1995). The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., &Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system.Annual Review of Neuroscience,27, 169–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., &Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions.Cognitive Brain Research,3, 131–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., &Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2, 661–670.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., &Gallese, V. (2004). Cortical mechanisms subserving object grasping, action understanding, and imitation. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 427–440). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P., &Hespos, S. J. (1997). Differential rooting response by neonates: Evidence for an early sense self.Early Development & Parenting,6, 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, P., &Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency.Nature Neuroscience,4, 546–550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, P., &Decety, J. (2004). How would you feel versus how do you think she would feel? A neuroimaging study of perspective taking with social emotions.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,16, 988–999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, P., Sirigu, A., &Decety, J. (2002). Distinct areas in parietal cortex involved in long-term and short-term action planning: A PET investigation.Cortex,38, 321–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryalls, B. O., Gul, R. E., &Ryalls, K. R. (2000). Infant’s imitation of peer and adult models: Evidence for a peer model advantage.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,46, 188–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R. (2005). Against simulation: The argument from error.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 174–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R., Carey, S., &Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging.Annual Review of Psychology,55, 87–124.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schubotz, R. I., &von Cramon, Y. (2003). Functional-anatomical concepts for human premotor cortex: Evidence from fMRI and PET studies.NeuroImage,20, S120-S131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., &Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own?Cognition,88, B11-B21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming.Psychological Review,91, 417–447.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrar, M., &Freyd, J. J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body.Psychological Science,1, 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, M., &Varley, R. (2002). Neural systems involved in “theory of mind”.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,3, 463–471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slackman, E. A., Hudson, J. A., &Fivush, R. (1986). Actions, actors, links, and goals: The structure of children’s event representations. In K. Nelson (Ed.),Event knowledge: Structure and function in development (pp. 47–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I. M., &Bryson, S. E. (1994). Imitation and action in autism: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin,116, 259–273. or]Sommerville, J. A., & Hammond, A. J. (2005). Treating another’s actions as one’s own: Children’s memory of and learning from joint activity. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, J. A., &Woodward, A. L. (2005a). Infants’ sensitivity to the causal features of means-end support sequences in actions and perception.Infancy,8, 119–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, J. A., &Woodward, A. L. (2005b). Pulling out the intentional structure of action: The relation between action processing and action production in infancy.Cognition,95, 1–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, J. A., Woodward, A. L., &Needham, A. (2005). Action experience alters 3-month-old infants’ perception of others’ actions.Cognition,96, B1-B11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, S. A., Brooks, D. J., Hirsch, S. R., Liddle, P. F., Meehan, J., &Grasby, P. M. (1997). A PET study of voluntary movement in schizophrenic patients experiencing passivity phenomena (delusions of alien control).Brain,120, 1997–2011.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, R. W. (1952). Neurology and the mind—body problem.American Scientist,40, 291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. A., Fonlupt, P., Shiffrar, M. A., &Decety, J. (2000). New aspects of motion perception: Selective neural encoding of apparent human movements.NeuroReport,11, 109–115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, A., &Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action.Psychological Research,68, 176–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, Y. F., Scherfler, C., Brooks, D. J., Sawamoto, N., &Castiello, U. (2004). The human premotor cortex is mirror only for biological actions.Current Biology,14, 117–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E. (1995). Motor development: A new synthesis.American Psychologist,50, 79–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., &Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, M. H., Dollinger, S. J., &Roberts, M. C. (1975). On being imitated: Its effects on attraction and reciprocal imitation.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,31, 467–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thobois, S., Dominey, P. F., Decety, J., Pollak, P. P., Gregoire, M. C., Le Bars, P. D., &Broussolle, E. (2000). Motor imagery in normal subjects and in asymmetrical Parkinson’s disease: A PET study.Neurology,55, 996–1002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999).The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Call, J., Warren, J. A., Frost, G. T., Carpenter, M., &Nagell, K. M. (1997). The ontogeny of chimpanzee gestural signals: A comparison across groups and generations.Evolution of Communication,1, 223–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. L. (1997). Goal-based organization of event memory in toddlers. In P. W. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer, & T. Bovig (Eds.),Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 111–138). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (Ed.),Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication (pp. 321–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umiltà, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., &Rizzolatti, G. (2001). I know what you are doing: A neurophysiological study.Neuron,31, 155–165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verfaillie, K., &Daems, A. (2002). Representing and anticipating human actions in vision.Visual Cognition,9, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K. E., Strafella, A. P., &Paus, T. (2003). Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production.Neuropsychologia,41, 989–994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M. (1990).The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., &Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief.Child Development,72, 702–707.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. H. G., Waiter, G. D., Gilchrist, A., Perrett, D. I., Murray, A. D., &Whiten, A. (2006). Neural mechanisms of imitation and “mirror neuron” functioning in autistic spectrum disorder.Neuropsychologia,44, 610–621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. H. G., Whiten, A., &Singh, T. (2004). A systematic review of action imitation in autistic spectrum disorder.Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders,34, 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. H. G., Whiten, A., Suddendorf, T., &Perrett, D. I. (2001). Imitation, mirror neurons and autism.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,25, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 625–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., &Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics.Psychological Bulletin,131, 460–473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. H., Maruff, P., Butson, M., Williams, J., Lum, J., &Thomas, P. R. (2004). Internal representation of movement in children with developmental coordination disorder.Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology,46, 754–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. H., Thomas, P. R., &Maruff, P. (2002). Motor imagery training ameliorates motor clumsiness in children.Journal of Child Neurology,17, 491–498.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., &Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception.Cognition,13, 103–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. N., Knutson, K. M., &Grafman, J. (2005). Psychological structure and neural correlates of event knowledge.Cerebral Cortex,15, 1155–1161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimura, N., &Kawamura, M. (2005).[Impairment of social cognition in Parkinson’s disease]. No To Shinkei,57, 107–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J. M. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events.Cognitive Science,28, 979–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., et al. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries.Nature Neuroscience,4, 651–655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J. M., &Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception.Psychological Bulletin,127, 3–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., &Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalla, T., Pradat-Diehl, P., &Sirigu, A. (2003). Perception of action boundaries in patients with frontal lobe damage.Neuropsychologia,41, 1619–1627.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilbovicius, M., Boddaert, N., Belin, P., Poline, J.-B., Remy, P., Mangin, J.-F., et al. (2000). Temporal lobe dysfunction in childhood autism: A PET study.American Journal of Psychiatry,157, 1988–1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilbovicius, M., Garreau, B., Samson, Y., Remy, P., Barthélémy, C., Syrota, A., &Lelord, G. (1995). Delayed maturation of the frontal cortex in childhood autism.American Journal of Psychiatry,152, 248–252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica A. Sommerville.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sommerville, J.A., Decety, J. Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 179–200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193831

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193831

Keywords

Navigation