Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 11, 2019

Equal rights for all conditionals

  • Philipp Weisser EMAIL logo
From the journal Linguistics Vanguard

Abstract

In recent years, a number of arguments have been put forward stating that regular conditional clauses preceding their matrix clause are derived by means of movement: They are base-generated low in the tree and then moved to the high clause-initial position. Using data from English and German, I show in this short paper that these arguments carry over straightforwardly to less canonical conditional constructions such as V1-conditionals and conditional conjunction constructions. That suggests that, if the original arguments hold, then V1-conditionals and conditional conjunction constructions should be derived by movement as well.

References

Adams, Marianne. 1985. Government of empty subjects in factive clausal complements. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 305–313.Search in Google Scholar

Axel, Katrin & Angelika Wöllstein. 2009. German verb-first conditionals as unintegrated clauses: A case study in converging synchronic and diachronic evidence. In Sam Featherston & Winkler Susanne (eds.), The fruits of empirical linguistics II, 1–35. De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216158.1Search in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva. 2007. Conditionals. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Wiley.10.1002/9780470996591.ch16Search in Google Scholar

Biezma, Maria. 2011. Conditional inversion and givenness. In Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches and David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 21, 552–571.10.3765/salt.v21i0.2591Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2018. Binding, coreference, and presuppositions: A presuppositional Precede-and-Command binding theory. Unpublished draft. University of Delaware.Search in Google Scholar

Büring, Daniel & Katharina Hartmann. 1997. Doing the right thing. The Linguistic Review 14(1). 1–42.10.1515/tlir.1997.14.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff. 1997. Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 28(2). 195–217.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Frey, Werner. 1993. Semantische Bedingungen für die Syntaktisch Interpretation. Akademie Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Frey, Werner. 2016. On some correlations between interpretative and formal properties of causal clauses. In Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds.), Co- and subordination in German and other languages, Helmut Buske Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind & Language 18(4). 317–339.10.1111/1468-0017.00230Search in Google Scholar

Iatridou, Sabine. 1991. Topics in conditionals. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Iatridou, Sabine & David Embick. 1994. Conditional inversion. In Proceedings of NELS 24, UMASS. Amherst.Search in Google Scholar

Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. USA: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1981. ECP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 93–133.Search in Google Scholar

Keshet, Ezra. 2013. Focus on conditional conjunction. Journal of Semantics 30(2). 211– 256.10.1093/jos/ffs011Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Carol & Paul Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & K.E. Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Klinedinst, N. & D. Rothschild. 2012. Connectives without truth tables. Natural Language Semantics 20. 1–39.10.1007/s11050-011-9079-5Search in Google Scholar

Reis, Marga. 1995. ‘Wer glaubst du hat recht?’ On so-called extractions from verb-second clauses and verb-first parenthetical constructions in German. Sprache und Pragmatik 36. 27–83.Search in Google Scholar

Reis, Marga. 1996. Extraction from verb-second clauses in German? In Uli Lutz and Jürgen Pafel (eds.), Extraction and extraposition, 45–88. John Benjamins.10.1075/la.11.03reiSearch in Google Scholar

Reis, Marga & A. Wöllstein. 2010. Zur Grammatik (vor allem) konditionaler V1-Gefüge im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29. 111–179.10.1515/zfsw.2010.004Search in Google Scholar

Rooryck, Johan. 1992. Negative and Factive Islands Revisited. Journal of Linguistics 28(2). 343–374.10.1017/S0022226700015255Search in Google Scholar

Rouveret, Alain. 1980. Sur la notion de proposition finie: gouvernement et inversion. Langages 60. 61–88.10.3406/lgge.1980.1863Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Hidemitsu. 2004. The English Imperative: A Cognitive and Functional Analysis: Hokkaido University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Weisser, Philipp. 2015. Derived Coordination – A Minimalist Perspective on Clause Chains, Converbs and Asymmetric Coordination (Linguistische Arbeiten 561). Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110443578Search in Google Scholar

Weisser, Philipp. 2019. Implicational Complement Coordination and beyond: Towards a Coherent Theory of Asymmetric Coordination in German. To appear in Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft.10.1515/zfs-2019-0003Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Niina. 2010. Coordination in Syntax. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zoerner, Ed. 1995. Coordination: The Syntax of & P University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-06-15
Accepted: 2019-04-01
Published Online: 2019-07-11

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0008/html
Scroll to top button