skip to main content
10.1145/964442.964483acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Speech and sketching for multimodal design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 January 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

While sketches are commonly and effectively used in the early stages of design, some information is far more easily conveyed verbally than by sketching. In response, we have combined sketching with speech, enabling a more natural form of communication. We studied the behavior of people sketching and speaking, and from this derived a set of rules for segmenting and aligning the signals from both modalities. Once the inputs are aligned, we use both modalities in interpretation. The result is a more natural interface to our system.

References

  1. A. Adler. Segmentation and Alignment of Speech and Sketching in a Design Environment. Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Alvarado and R. Davis. Resolving ambiguities to create a natural computer-based sketching environment. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1365--1374, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. K. D. Forbus, R. W. Ferguson, and J. M. Usher. Towards a computational model of sketching. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 77--83. ACM Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. J. Hazen, S. Seneff, and J. Polifroni. Recognition confidence scoring and its use in speech understanding systems. Computer Speech and Language, 16:49--67, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Johnston, S. Bangalore, G. Vasireddy, A. Stent, P. Ehlen, M. Walker, S. Whittaker, and P. Maloor. MATCH: An architecture for multimodal dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 376--383, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Oltmans. Understanding Naturally Conveyed Explanations of Device Behavior. Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Oviatt, P. Cohen, L. Wu, J. Vergo, L. Duncan, B. Suhm, J. Bers, T. Holzman, T. Winograd, J. Landay, J. Larson, and D. Ferro. Designing the user interface for multimodal speech and pen-based gesture applications: State-of-the-art systems and future research directions. Human Computer Interaction, 15(4):263--322, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Speech and sketching for multimodal design

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  IUI '04: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
                  January 2004
                  396 pages
                  ISBN:1581138156
                  DOI:10.1145/964442

                  Copyright © 2004 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 13 January 2004

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  IUI '04 Paper Acceptance Rate72of140submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader