Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T20:22:00.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Skin Irritation and Dryness Associated With Two Hand-Hygiene Regimens: Soap-and-Water Hand Washing Versus Hand Antisepsis With an Alcoholic Hand Gel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John M. Boyce ,
Susan Kelliher  and
Nancy Vallande
John M. Boyce*
Affiliation:
Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Susan Kelliher
Affiliation:
Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
Nancy Vallande
Affiliation:
Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
*
Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of Saint Raphael, 1450 Chapel St, New Haven, CT 06511
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the frequency of skin irritation and dryness associated with using an alcoholic–hand-gel regimen for hand antisepsis versus using soap and water for hand washing.

Design:

Prospective randomized trial with crossover design. Irritation and dryness of nurses' hands were evaluated by self-assessment and by visual assessment by a study nurse. Epidermal water content of the dorsal surface of nurses' hands was estimated by measuring electrical capacitance of the skin.

Setting:

Miriam Hospital, a 200-bed university-affiliated teaching hospital.

Participants:

Thirty-two nurses working on three hospital wards participated in the trial, which lasted 6 weeks.

Results:

Self-assessment scores of skin irritation and dryness decreased slightly during the 2 weeks when nurses used the alcoholic–hand-gel regimen (mean baseline score, 2.72; mean final score, 2.0; P=.08) but increased substantially during the 2 weeks when nurses used soap and water (mean baseline score, 2.0; mean final score, 4.8; P<.0001). Visual assessment scores by the study nurse of skin irritation and dryness did not change significantly when the alcoholic–hand-gel regimen was used (mean baseline and final scores were both 0.55), but scores increased substantially when nurses used soap and water (baseline score, 0.59; mean final score, 1.21; P=.05). Epidermal water content of the dorsal surface of nurses' hands changed little when the alcoholic–hand-gel regimen was used (mean ± standard deviation baseline electrical capacitance reading, 24.8±6.8; mean final reading, 25.7±7.3), but decreased significantly (skin became dryer) with soap-and-water hand washing (mean baseline, 25.9±7.5; mean final reading, 20.5±5.4; P=.0003).

Conclusions:

Hand antisepsis with an alcoholic–hand-gel regimen was well tolerated and did not result in skin irritation and dryness of nurses' hands. In contrast, skin irritation and dryness increased significantly when nurses washed their hands with the unmedicated soap product available in the hospital. Newer alcoholic hand gels that are tolerated better than soap may be more acceptable to staff and may lead to improved hand-hygiene practices.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 21 , Issue 7 , July 2000 , pp. 442 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hughes, JM, Tenover, FC. Approaches to limiting emergence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria in human populations. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24(suppl 1):S131–S135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Shlaes, DM, Gerding, DN, John, JF Jr, Craig, WA, Bornstein, DL, Duncan, RA, et al. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Diseases Society of America Joint Committee on the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance: guidelines for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Garner, JS. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:53–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Albert, RK, Condie, F. Hand-washing patterns in medical intensive-care units. N Engl J Med 1981;24:1465–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Preston, GA, Larson, EL, Stamm, WE. The effect of private isolation rooms on patient care practices, colonization and infection in an intensive care unit. Am J Med 1981;70:641–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Doebbeling, BN, Pfaller, MA, Houston, AK, Wenzel, RP. Removal of nosocomial pathogens from the contaminated glove. Ann Intern Med 1988;109:394–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Dubbert, PM, Dolce, J, Richter, W, Miller, M, Chapman, SW. Increasing ICU staff handwashing: effects of education and group feedback. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;11:191–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Larson, E, Kretzer, EK. Compliance with handwashing and barrier precautions. J Hosp Infect 1995;30(suppl):88–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Larson, E, Killien, M. Factors influencing handwashing behavior of patient care personnel. Am J Infect Control 1982;10:93–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Pittet, D, Mourouga, P, Perneger, TV. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Infection Control Program. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:126–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Zimakoff, J, Kjelsberg, AB, Larsen, SO, Holstein, B. A multicenter questionnaire investigation of attitudes toward hand hygiene, assessed by the staff in fifteen hospitals in Denmark and Norway. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:58–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Newman, JL, Seitz, JC. Intermittent use of an antimicrobial hand gel for reducing soap-induced irritation of health care personnel. Am J Infect Control 1990;18:194–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Ojajarvi, J. Handwashing in Finland. J Hosp Infect 1991;18:35–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Ayliffe, GAJ, Babb, JR, Davies, JG, Lilly, HA. Hand disinfection: a comparison of various agents in laboratory and ward studies. J Hosp Infect 1988;11:226–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Larson, EL, Eke, PI, Laughon, BE. Efficacy of alcohol-based hand rinses under frequent-use conditions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986;30:542–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Ojajarvi, J. Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing. J Hyg (Camb) 1980;85:193–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Rotter, ML. Hand washing and hand disinfection. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996:1052–1068.Google Scholar
18. Dineen, P, Hildick-Smith, G. Antiseptic care of the hands. In: Maibach, HI, Hildick-Smith, G, eds. Skin Bacteria and Their Role in Infection. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1965:291–309.Google Scholar
19. Steere, AC, Mallison, GF. Handwashing practices for the prevention of nosocomial infections. Ann Intern Med 1975;83:683–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Ollmar, S, Nyren, M, Nicander, I, Lemtestam, L. Electrical impedance compared with other non-invasive bioengineering techniques and visual scoring for detection in irritation in human skin. Br J Dermatol 1994;130:29–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Klein, G, Grubauer, G, Fritsch, P. The influence of daily dish-washing with synthetic detergent on human skin. J Dermatol 1992;127:131–137.Google ScholarPubMed
22. Rotter, ML, Koller, W, Neumann, R. The influence of cosmetic additives on the acceptability of alcohol-based hand disinfectants. J Hosp Infect 1991;18(suppl B):57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Doebbeling, BN, Stanley, GL, Sheetz, CT, Pfaller, MA, Houston, AK, Annis, L, et al. Comparative efficacy of alternative hand-washing agents in reducing nosocomial infections in intensive care units. N Engl J Med 1992;327:88–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Kaplan, LM, McGuckin, M. Increasing handwashing compliance with more accessible sinks. Infect Control 1986;7:408–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Voss, A, Widmer, AF. No time for handwashing!? Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:205–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Larson, EL, Eke, PI, Wilder, MP, Laughon, BE. Quantity of soap as a variable in handwashing. Infect Control 1987;8:371–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Larson, EL. APIC guideline for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:251–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed