Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

New Hypothesis of the Cause of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Culex pipiens L.

Abstract

IF males of one strain of C. pipiens are crossed with females of a strain from a different geographical area, the number of offspring may be either normal or small, or there may be none at all1. These three results have been called compatible, partially compatible and incompatible, respectively. Reciprocal crosses may give the same or different results. For example, strain A males may be fully compatible with strain B females, but strain B males may be compatible, incompatible, or only partially compatible, with strain A females.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laven, H., Z. Indukt. Abstamm. Vererbungslehre, 88, 478 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jost, E., Wilhelm Roux' Archiv., 166, 173 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barr, A. R., Proc. Calif. Mosq. Control Assoc., 37, 19 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith-White, S., and Woodhill, A. R., Proc. Linn. Soc. NSW, 79, 163 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  5. McClelland, G. A. H., Genetics of Insect Vectors of Disease, 277 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hertig, M., Parasitology, 28, 453 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zulueta, J. de, WHO/VB/ 125.65, 69 (1965).

  8. Callot, J., Ann. Parasitol. Human Comp., 25, 354 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Poulson, D. F., and Sakaguchi, B., Science, 133, 1489 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. L'Heritier, P., Adv. Virus Res., 5, 195 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kernaghan, R. P., and Ehrman, L., Chromosoma, 29, 291 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sellards, A. W., and Siler, J. F., Amer. J. Trop. Med., 8, 299 (1928).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

YEN, J., BARR, A. New Hypothesis of the Cause of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Culex pipiens L.. Nature 232, 657–658 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/232657a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/232657a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing