Skip to main content
Log in

Proximate Mechanisms of Sexual Selection in the Firefly Photinus pyralis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male competition in courtships of the firefly Photinus pyralis is intense. Morphometric analysis revealed that male size is variable, possibly exhibiting alternative body plans. We examined the outcomes of courtships to determine the proximate mechanisms of selection that may have led to male allometry. Two distinct selective events exist within mate competition: (1) searching and (2) scramble competition. Although many courtships failed, those without rivals were shorter and successful males spent less time in the “mate-guarding” position than when several males were in competition. Winners outflashed rivals, but flash dialogs occurred at similar frequencies across rival densities, indicating that females require some quantum of information before mating. Female flash preference was examined in choice tests to evaluate female discrimination ability. Females preferred flashes of greater intensity and precedence. This suggests that flash “synchronization” is a competitive display rather than a cooperative behavior to maintain female responsiveness. Selection for male size was density dependent: females preferred large males in searching, while small males were favored in scrambles. Simulated scrambles showed that small males have superior locomotor abilities, allowing them to reach the female rapidly. Comparison with a species lacking scrambles, P. macdermotti, revealed that selection in P. pyralis is disruptive, targeting traits alternately, and may have led to the evolution of higher allometric ratios in a species with direct male competition. Both male competition and female choice are important determinants of the outcome of P. pyralis courtships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Branham, M. A., and Greenfield, M. D. (1996). Flashing males win mate success. Nature 381: 745–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. (1935). Synchronous flashing of fireflies experimentally induced. Science 81: 339–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. (1937). Studies on the firefly. I. The effects of light and other agents on flashing in Photinus pyralis, with special reference to periodicity and diurnal rhythm. Physiol. Zool. 10: 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. B. (1988). Synchronous rhythmic flashing of fireflies II. Q. Rev. Biol. 63: 265–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. (1990). Unisex flash controls in dialog fireflies. Biol. Bull. 179: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J., and Buck, E. (1972). Photic signalling in the firefly Photinus greeni. Biol. Bull. 142: 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J., and Buck, E. (1978). Toward a functional interpretation of synchronous flashing by fireflies. Am. Nat. 112: 471–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J., Buck, E., Case, J. F., and Hanson, F. E. (1981). Control of flashing in fireflies. V. Pace-maker synchronization in Pteroptyx cribellata. J. Comp. Physiol. 144: 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J., Hanson, F., Buck, E., and Case, J. F. (1982). Mechanism and function of synchronous flashing in the firefly Photinus pyralis. Biol. Bull. 163: 398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, J. F. (1984). Vision in mating behavior of fireflies. In Lewis, T. (ed.), Insect Communication, Academic Press, New York, pp. 195–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A. D., and Copeland, J. (1985). Flash communication in fireflies. I. Q. Rev. Biol. 60: 415–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A. D., and Copeland, J. (1988). Flash competition in male Photinus macdermotti fireflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A. D., Copeland, J., Raderman, R., and Bulloch, A. G. M. (1976). Role of interflash intervals in a firefly courtship (Photinus macdermotti). Anim. Behav. 24: 786–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, Modern Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds, L. N. (1963). The relationship between temperature and flashing intervals in adult male fireflies, Photinus pyralis. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 56: 716–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. A. (1992). Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139: s125–s153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, M. D., and Roizen, I. (1993). Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionary stable outcome of female choice. Nature 364: 618–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, A. B., Chapman, R. M., Trouth, C. O., and Holloway, J. A. (1980). Spectral mechanisms of the compound eye of the firefly Photinus pyralis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). J. Comp. Physiol. 147: 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. M., and Wang, O. T. (1991). Reproductive ecology of two species of Photinus fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Psyche 98: 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1966). Studies on the flash communication of Photinus fireflies. Univ. Mich. Mus. Zool. Misc. Publ. No. 130, pp. 1–96.

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1979). Sexual selection in luminescent beetles. In Blum, M., and Blum, N. (eds.), Sexual and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, New York, pp. 293–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mast, S. O. (1912). Behavior of fire-flies (Photinus pyralis) with special reference to the problem of orientation. J. Anim. Behav. 2: 256–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, U. M. (1968). Some parameters of photic signaling important to sexual and species recognition in the firefly Photinus pyralis, M.S. thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minckley, R. L., Greenfield, M. D., and Tourtellot, M. K. (1995). Chorus structure in tarbush grasshoppers: Inhibition, selective phonoresponse, and signal competition. Anim. Behav. 50: 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, D. (1974). Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 385–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vencl, F. V., Blasko, B. J., and Carlson, A. D. (1994). Flash behavior of female Photuris versicolor fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) in simulated courtship and predatory dialogues. J. Insect Behav. 7: 843–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. (1983). Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. (1984). Sexual selection, competitive communication and species-specific signals in insects. In Lewis, T. (ed.), Insect Communication, Academic Press, New York, pp. 283–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, C. L., and Krebs, J. R. (1975). Mate selection in Pacific tree frogs. Nature 255: 325–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, S. R. (1985). Prolonged copulation and male competition in Photinus macdermotti with comparative notes on Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Fla. Entomol. 68: 627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyttenbach, R. A., and Hoy, R. R. (1993). Demonstration of the precedence effect in an insect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94: 777–784.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vencl, F.V., Carlson, A.D. Proximate Mechanisms of Sexual Selection in the Firefly Photinus pyralis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Journal of Insect Behavior 11, 191–207 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021091806472

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021091806472

Navigation