Skip to main content
Log in

Structure–Pharmacokinetic Relationships in a Series of Valpromide Derivatives with Antiepileptic Activity

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The following valpromide (VPD) derivatives were synthesized and their structure–pharmacokinetic relationships explored: ethylbutylacetamide (EBD), methylpentylacetamide (MPD), propylisopropylacetamide (PID), and propylallylacetamide (PAD). In addition, the anticonvulsant activity of these compounds was evaluated and compared to that of VPD, valnoctamide (VCD), and valproic acid (VPA). MPD, the least-branched compound had the largest clearance and shortest half-life of all the amides investigated and was the least active. All other amides had similar pharmacokinetic parameters. Unlike the other amides, PID and VCD did not metabolize to their respective homologous acids and were the most active compounds. Our study showed that these amides need an unsubstituted β position in their aliphatic side chain in order to biotransform to their homologous acids. An amide which is not metabolized is more potent as an anticonvulsant than its biotransformed isomer. All amides were more active than their respective homologous acids. In this particular series of aliphatic amides, which were derived from short-branched fatty acids, the anticonvulsant activity was affected by the pharmacokinetics in general and by the biotransformation of the amide to its homologous acid in particular. This amide–acid biotransformation appeared to be dependent upon the chemical structure, especially upon the substitution at position β of the molecule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. P. Favel, J. Cartier, J. P. Gratadou, and G. Gratadou. Epilepsia 14:329–334 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Musolino, G. Gallitto, L. Morgante, F. Pisani, and R. Di Perri. Acta Neurol. 2:107–114 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Pisani and R. Di Perri. Ital. J. Neurol. Sci. 4:245–249 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Pisani, A. Fazio, G. Oteri, and R. Di Perri. Ther. Drug Monit. 3:297–301 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Bialer, A. Rubinstein, I. Raz, and O. Abramsky. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 27:501–503 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. H. Levy. Epilepsia 25:Suppl. 1 (1984).

  7. F. Pisani, A. A. D'Agostino, A. Fazio, G. Oteri, G. Primerano, and R. Di Perri. Epilepsia 23:115–121 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Bialer, A. Rubinstein, J. Dubrovsky, I. Raz, and O. Abramsky. Int. J. Pharm. 23:25–33 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Loscher and H. Nau. Neuropharmacology 24:427–435 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. W. A. Meijer, C. D. Binnie, R. M. C. Debets, J. A. P. Van Parys, and N. K. B. De Beer-Pawlikowski. Lancet 1:802 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. M. Pacifici, T. Tomson, L. Bertilsson, and A. Rane. Lancet 1:397–398 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Pisani, A. Fazio, G. Oteri, G. Ruello, C. Gitto, F. Russo, and E. Perucca. Epilepsia 27:548–552 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. M. Pacifici and A. Rane. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 60:237–238 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Pisani, A. Fazio, G. Oteri, E. Spina, E. Perucca, and L. Bertilsson. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 25:611–613 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Bialer and A. Rubinstein. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 35:607–609 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Bialer and A. Rubinstein. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 5:177–183 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Stepansky. Curr. Ther. Res. 2:144–149 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  18. _Merck. The Merck Index, 10th ed., Merck, Rahway, N.J., 1983, p. 1417.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martindale. The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 28th ed., Pharmaceutical Press, London, 1982, p. 1563.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Haj-Yehia and M. Bialer. J. Pharm. Sci. 77:831–834 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. De Matteis. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1:267–275 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. R. Oritz de Montellano and B. A. Mico. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 23:481–503 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. E. Keane, J. Simiand, E. Mendes, V. Santucci, and M. Morre. Neuropharmacology 22:875–879 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. J. Porter, J. J. Cereghino, G. D. Gladding, B. J. Hessie, H. J. Kupferberg, B. Scoville, and B. G. White. Cliv. Clin. Q. 51:293–305 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Bialer, M. Friedman, and A. Rubinstein. J. Pharm. Sci. 73:991–993 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Bialer and B. Hoch. J. Chromatogr. Biomed. Appl. 337:408–411 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier. Pharmacokinetics, Ed. 2, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp. 445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier. Pharmacokinetics, Ed. 2, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp. 409–417.

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. Z. Benet and R. L. Galeazzi. J. Pharm. Sci. 68:1071–1074 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Yamaoka, T. Nakagawa, and T. Uno. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 6:547–588 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. A. Kaplan, M. L. Jack, S. Cotler, and K. Alexander. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 1:201–212 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Rowland and T. Tozer. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1980, pp. 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  33. K. Yamaoka. Methods for Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Personal Computers, Ed. 2, Nanko-D Ltd., Tokyo, 1986, pp. 145–175.

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Rowland and T. Tozer. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1980, pp. 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier. Pharmacokinetics, Ed. 2, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp. 327–330.

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. L. Altman and D. S. Dittmer. Biological Data Book, Ed. 2, Vol. III, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Bethesda, Md., 1974, pp. 1072–1710.

    Google Scholar 

  37. G. R. Wilkinson and D. G. Sland. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 18:337–380 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haj-Yehia, A., Bialer, M. Structure–Pharmacokinetic Relationships in a Series of Valpromide Derivatives with Antiepileptic Activity. Pharm Res 6, 683–689 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015934321764

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015934321764

Navigation