Buried and open tunnel valleys in Denmark—erosion beneath multiple ice sheets
Introduction
Tunnel valleys are large elongated depressions of subglacial origin cut into both unconsolidated sediments and bedrock (e.g. ÓCofaigh, 1996). They occur with undulating longitudinal profiles and contain sections that slope upwards, sometimes to be terminated at the apex of an outwash fan. They are generally believed to have served as major subglacial drainage pathways for large volumes of meltwater, and are thus supposed to play a substantial role for the entire hydraulic system beneath glaciers. Because glacier behaviour largely reflects the subglacial hydraulic regime, the understanding of how tunnel valleys form and act is of crucial importance for the reconstruction and understanding of former ice sheets.
Tunnel valleys have been discussed intensely for more than a century, and agreement as to how they were formed remains poor. However, recent years have seen new research into this area owing both to a growing interest in subglacial processes and to the growing sophistication of investigation methods (e.g. geophysical and computational). Tunnel valleys are found in the present-day landscape and in the subsurface where they were created by the European Pleistocene ice sheets (e.g. Woodland, 1970; Ehlers et al., 1984; Ehlers and Linke, 1989; Huuse and Lykke-Andersen, 2000) and by the Laurentide Ice Sheet of North America (e.g. Wright, 1973; Mullins and Hinchey, 1989; Patterson, 1994; Clayton et al., 1999). However, tunnel valleys have also been formed elsewhere in the world, for instance beneath Paleozoic ice sheets as reported by e.g. Visser (1988), Hirst et al. (2002), Eyles and de Broekert (2001) and Ghienne and Deynoux (1998). The difficulty of investigating tunnel valley formation processes lies mainly in the inaccessibility of the subglacial environment, but also in the fact that the conditions favouring these processes seem to be restricted under the present climatic conditions. The discussion of the tunnel valley formation processes mainly focuses on whether the valleys were eroded by subglacial meltwater or by a combination of meltwater and glacier ice erosion, and whether the eroding meltwater was discharged in catastrophic outbursts or by steady-state flows (cf. ÓCofaigh, 1996). Strong evidence backs these theories, and it is likely that there is no universal tunnel valley formation mode and that the valleys have a polygenetic origin (e.g. Huuse and Lykke-Andersen, 2000).
In this paper, we show the characteristics of buried valleys in Denmark (Fig. 1) by using newly collected hydrogeophysical data combined with lithological data. These are compared with the open tunnel valleys as described by other authors (e.g. Ussing, 1903, Ussing, 1907; Milthers, 1935b, Milthers, 1948; Nordmann, 1958; Smed, 1962, Smed, 1998; Nielsen, 1967; Sjørring, 1979). We find that the buried valleys and the open tunnel valleys share the same characteristics and most likely also the same origin. Tunnel valley genesis is discussed and a model for their origin is proposed.
Section snippets
Terminology
The term tunnel valley was coined by Madsen (1921) to describe subglacially melt-water-eroded valleys in Denmark as interpreted by Ussing, 1903, Ussing, 1907. These tunnel valleys are open features, but the term tunnel valley has also been used for buried features (e.g. Woodland, 1970).
The term tunnel valley is not entirely unproblematic and several objections have been raised against its use. A ‘valley’ is, for example, supposed to have a falling thalweg, but tunnel valleys defy this feature (
Previous work on tunnel valleys in Denmark
The early descriptions of Danish tunnel valleys focused on valleys in the middle part of Jutland (Ussing, 1903, Ussing, 1907), which were described as elongate depressions with undulating longitudinal profiles containing hollows and thresholds and without a continuously falling thalweg. Close to the maximum ice limit (the Main Stationary Line (MSL, Fig. 2)) at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) they were found to rise several tens of metres before terminating in large outwash fans. These
Regional geological setting
Denmark is characterized by large outwash plains, gently undulating moraines and diversified hummocky landscapes. At its maximum, the landscape rises to 173 m above sea level. The Quaternary subcrop of Denmark consists of limestones and chalk in the northern and eastern parts, heavy Paleogene clays in a zone from northwest towards southeast, and Neogene sands, silts and clays to the southwest (Fig. 1). The pre-Quaternary surface is covered by Quaternary sediments with a general thickness of 5–100
Data
Buried valleys are mapped primarily on the basis of comprehensive geophysical and lithological data collected by the Danish counties. These data mainly comprise TEM data, shallow seismic data and borehole data. The primary aim for the counties to collect the data is to delineate site-specific groundwater protection zones with a view to regulating land use and securing groundwater protection (Thomsen et al., 2004). They therefore need spatially dense, high-quality geophysical data to supplement
Occurrence and patterns
Fig. 2 shows the open tunnel valleys in Denmark as mapped by Smed, 1979, Smed, 1981a, Smed, 1981b, Smed, 1982. In the northwestern part of Denmark, the valleys are generally arranged in a convergent pattern pointing towards the sharp re-entry into the MSL and further south they head more or less perpendicular to the MSL. The large tunnel valleys are most pronounced in Jutland, but smaller tunnel valleys are also evident on Funen and Zealand (e.g. Andersen, 1931; Milthers, 1935; Smed, 1962;
Occurrence
All buried valleys mapped in accordance with the criteria described above are shown in Fig. 4. Their distribution presented on the map, however, does not reflect their real distribution in Denmark, because (1) no interpolation between the identified valleys has been made, (2) the density of useful data is unevenly distributed, (3) regional variations in the character of the subsurface (Fig. 1) make it difficult to achieve distinct results with the geophysical methods and to interpret borehole
Comparison between the buried valleys and the open tunnel valleys
The above examination shows that the buried valleys and the open tunnel valleys share several morphological characteristics: (1) They are arranged individually or appear in anastomosing patterns, (2) individual valley segments are generally straight or slightly sinuous, (3) the irregular longitudinal profiles with hollows and thresholds are typical for both, (4) both often have U-shaped profiles with rather steep sides, (5) eskers are common within the open tunnel valleys and their presence is
Comparison with tunnel valleys at other locations
Multiple tunnel valleys generations are also found elsewhere in Northern Europe and are mostly attributed to the last three glaciations (Wingfield, 1989; Piotrowski, 1994; Dobracki and Krzyszkowski, 1997; Glasser et al., 2004). Weichselian tunnel valleys are commonly preserved in the present-day landscape (e.g. Ussing, 1907; Galon, 1965) or on the sea floor (e.g. Long and Stoker, 1986), but tunnel valleys can also be buried in the subsurface (Woodland, 1970), which is typically seen for valleys
Tunnel valleys formed by multiple glaciations
The main tunnel valley formation hypotheses focus on subglacial meltwater erosion and the way the subglacial meltwater carves the substratum (cf. ÓCofaigh, 1996; Huuse and Lykke-Andersen, 2000). As already inferred by Ussing, 1903, Ussing, 1907, tunnel valley formation by subglacial meltwater erosion can also be attributed to the open tunnel valleys in Denmark, but a debate as to whether the valleys possibly formed by direct glacial erosion also is still thriving.
We agree that the tunnel
Conclusions
Extensive systems of buried tunnel valleys in Denmark were mapped by means of newly collected hydrogeophysical data. These data were evaluated along with lithological data and valley characteristics were investigated and compared with those of open tunnel valleys in Denmark and tunnel valleys in other parts of the world. The main conclusions of this work are stated in the following:
- •
Buried valleys in Denmark can be considered tunnel valleys formed subglacially beneath multiple glaciers. They are
Acknowledgements
The counties of Vejle and Aarhus are thanked for allowing us to use and to publish their data. All counties in Jutland and Funen are thanked for their permission to publish the results of their project. We are also thankful to Vejle County, Watertech a/s and Kurt Sørensen for financial support. Holger Lykke-Andersen and Jan Piotrowski are acknowledged for helpful discussions on tunnel valley genesis and for comments that helped us improve an early version of the paper. Constructive reviews by
References (158)
- et al.
Late Wisconsin landform distribution and glacier-bed conditions in Wisconsin
Sedimentary Geology
(1989) Tunnel channels in southeast Alberta, Canada: evidence for catastrophic channelized drainage
Quaternary International
(2002)- et al.
Deep circulation of groundwater in overpressured subglacial aquifers and its geological consequences
Quaternary Science Reviews
(1993) - et al.
Groundwater flow beneath ice sheets: Part I—large scale patterns
Quaternary Science Reviews
(1995) - et al.
Sedimentologic evidence for outburst floods from the Laurentide Ice Sheet margin in Wisconsin, USA: implications for tunnel-channel formation
Quaternary International
(2002) - et al.
The application of the transient electromagnetic method in hydrogeophysical surveys
Journal of Applied Geophysics
(2003) - et al.
Sedimentation and erosion at the Weichselian ice-marginal zone near Golczewo, northwestern Poland
Quaternary Science Reviews
(1997) - et al.
Pre-Weichselian glaciations of north-west Europe
Quaternary Science Reviews
(1984) - et al.
Glacial tunnel valleys in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia cut below the Late Paleozoic Pilbara ice sheet
Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
(2001) - et al.
Geophysical investigation of buried Pleistocene subglacial valleys in Northern Germany
Journal of Applied Geophysics
(2003)