Attentional control moderates the relationship between activation of the cognitive attentional syndrome and symptoms of psychopathology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Wells’s (2009) metacognitive theory suggests that inflexible and recurrent styles of thinking in response to negative thoughts, feelings, and beliefs exacerbate symptoms of psychopathology. Such styles of thinking underlie the cognitive attentional syndrome (CAS). Using a large nonclinical sample (N = 456), the present study examined whether attentional control moderates the relationship between activation of the CAS and symptoms of psychopathology (i.e., depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms). Consistent with predictions, relationships between activation of the CAS and assessed symptoms became increasingly stronger as attentional control decreased. Thus, for individuals who have a relative inability to disengage and shift attention from threat information (i.e., low attentional control), use of CAS-relevant coping strategies (e.g., rumination, worry) appears to be associated with especially deleterious psychological effects. Conceptual and therapeutic implications are discussed.

Highlights

► Cognitive attentional syndrome (CAS) is a core construct of metacognitive theory. ► Assessed relations between CAS and symptoms of psychopathology. ► Examined whether attentional control (AC) moderated such relations. ► CAS was related to increased symptoms of psychopathology at low levels of AC.

Introduction

A transdiagnostic approach is based on the notion that the focus of theory and treatment should be on features that cut across psychological disorders (Mansell, Harvey, Watkins, & Shafran, 2008). Wells’s (2009) metacognitive model offers a promising transdiagnostic approach for conceptualizing and treating psychopathology, particularly for mood and anxiety disorders. According to Wells, metacognitive theory “deals with the way that people think and it assumes the problem rests with inflexible and recurrent styles of thinking in response to negative thoughts, feelings and beliefs” (p. 3). Wells termed this style of thinking as the cognitive attentional syndrome (CAS), which is marked by repetitive forms of thought (e.g., rumination, worry) and other maladaptive coping behaviors (e.g., thought suppression).

The CAS is believed to develop due to metacognitive beliefs about the usefulness of repetitive forms of thought and maladaptive coping behaviors. For example, an individual might hold positive beliefs about using repetitive forms of thought to reduce the likelihood of perceived threat (e.g., Worrying about the future means I can avoid danger; Wells, 2009). Such metacognitive beliefs purportedly lead to the development of a propensity for responding to negative thoughts, feelings, and beliefs with CAS-relevant coping strategies that maintain negative emotionality and strengthen maladaptive beliefs (Wells, 2009). Wells’s metacognitive theory differs from more traditional cognitive-behavioral perspectives in that it suggests that maladaptive beliefs are influenced by CAS-relevant coping strategies. That is, the theory holds that CAS-relevant coping strategies – and not the underlying maladaptive beliefs per se – lead to emotional and behavioral consequences. Wells asserts that the use of CAS-relevant coping strategies is associated with a number of deleterious outcomes, including development of attentional bias for perceived threat. A bias for attending to threat is thought to exacerbate mood and anxiety symptoms. As such, reducing use of CAS-relevant coping strategies is a core treatment goal of metacognitive therapy (Wells, 2009).

Consistent with metacognitive theory, individual differences in the ability to disengage from threat have been implicated in the maintenance and exacerbation of psychopathology. More specifically, Mathews (2004) stated that the “failure to disengage attention from threat information may be one causal factor in maintaining anxiety, by increasing the awareness of potential dangers. If so, then good attentional control may help to counter these adverse consequences, whereas poor control may exacerbate them.” (p. 1023). In support of Mathews’s assertion, research has shown that attentional control (AC: i.e., the use of top-down executive attentional processes to regulate bottom-up emotional responses; Derryberry & Reed, 2002) is positively associated with indicators of positive well-being (e.g., positive affect) and inversely associated with indicators of negative well-being (e.g., neuroticism: Compton, 2000, Eisenberg et al., 2000).

Research has provided additional support for the possibility that AC might serve as a protective individual difference variable against psychological symptoms. For example, research has shown that higher AC is associated with significantly faster recovery from trauma re-telling induced negative affect (Bardeen & Read, 2010) and lower AC is associated with externalizing behaviors and relatively poor social adaptation (Eisenberg et al., 2000). Further, AC has been shown to moderate the relation between emotional distress (i.e., trait anxiety, posttraumatic stress symptoms) and the ability to disengage from threat stimuli (Bardeen and Orcutt, 2011, Derryberry and Reed, 2002). That is, individuals with higher levels of emotional distress have greater difficulty disengaging from threat stimuli; however, among these individuals, those with higher AC disengage and shift attention significantly faster from threat information than those with lower AC (Bardeen & Orcutt, 2011). Taken together, findings suggest that higher levels of AC facilitate disengagement from threat, which in turn may improve emotional well-being.

Based on this information, AC may help link activation of the CAS to symptoms of psychopathology. This possibility is consistent with Spada, Georgiou, and Wells (2010), who proposed that the occurrence of symptoms of psychopathology is due to the joint impact of CAS-relevant metacognitive beliefs and AC. More specifically, Spada et al. opined that “individuals experiencing high states of anxiety may do so because of a combination of maladaption in metacognitions and dysfunction in attentional control” (p. 65). However, despite proposing that these two variables work in concert with one another, Spada et al. only examined the main effects of CAS-relevant metacognitive beliefs and AC in relation to symptoms of psychopathology, with both of these variables evidencing unique relations with symptoms of psychopathology (i.e., state anxiety).

As described above, it is our position that such main effects might be qualified by an interactive effect between maladaption in metacognitions and AC. More specifically, individuals high versus low in AC may be able to more easily disengage from threat information associated with use of CAS-relevant coping strategies. The relative inability of individuals with low AC to disengage from threat information in combination with the use of CAS-relevant coping strategies may lead to an exacerbation of mood and anxiety symptoms. Alternatively, the relative ability of individuals with high AC to disengage from threat associated with use of CAS-relevant coping strategies should serve as a protective factor against the deleterious effects of such coping strategies on psychological symptoms. If this pattern of relations is tenable, AC should moderate the relationship between activation of the CAS and symptoms of psychopathology. That is, the relationship between activation of the CAS and these symptoms should grow increasingly stronger as AC decreases. The present study sought to examine this possibility.

Section snippets

Participants

The sample consisted of 456 undergraduate students recruited through introductory psychology courses at a Midwestern US university. Students received partial course credit for participation. The sample had a mean age of 19.7 years (SD = 3.1) and was 55.5% female. Participants predominantly self-identified as White (61.0%), with a relative minority self-identifying as Black (17.8%), Asian (9.2%), and “Other” (10.4%). Approximately 1.6% of participants did not report their racial identification.

Depression

Descriptive statistics and zero-order correlations among the study variables are presented in Table 1. Regression results revealed that both the CAS (β = .45) and AC (β = −.16) were significantly associated with depression scores in Step 1 (R2 = .26; ps < .01). As predicted, the interaction between the CAS and AC (β = −.14) explained additional significant variance (ΔR2 = .02, p < .01) in depression scores in Step 2. Simple effects of this interaction are depicted in Fig. 1. As shown, the CAS shared a

Discussion

Consistent with its purported deleterious effects, activation of the CAS was significantly positively correlated with all of the assessed symptoms of psychopathology (i.e., depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms). Moreover, and as predicted, AC moderated the relationship between activation of the CAS and each of these symptoms. That is, relationships between activation of the CAS and symptoms grew increasingly stronger as AC decreased. Following from metacognitive theory (Wells, 2009),

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (59)

  • Depressed mood, brooding rumination and affective interference: The moderating role of heart rate variability

    2021, International Journal of Psychophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    For instance, studies described patterns of decreased resting-state functional connectivity between prefrontal areas and amygdala, suggesting weakened prefrontal inhibitory control over subcortical affective structures in rumination (Connolly et al., 2017; Makovac et al., 2016; Ray et al., 2005; Veer et al., 2010). Furthermore, inflexible and perseverative styles of thinking, such as brooding, highly influence attention processes, which, in turn, are central in the maintenance of dysfunctional regulation strategies and negative mood (Disner et al., 2011; Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008; Wells, 2011; Fergus et al., 2012). Specifically, brooding is associated with several detrimental consequences, such as the development of dysfunctions in the processing of affective content (Fergus et al., 2013; Wells, 2011).

  • Effects of attention training technique on brain function in high- and low-cognitive-attentional syndrome individuals: Regional dynamics before, during, and after a single session of ATT

    2020, Behaviour Research and Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Other studies show effects of ATT on attentional bias towards distressing or dysphoric stimuli (Barth et al., 2019; Schwind et al., 2016; Sharpe et al., 2010), which suggests that the effects of ATT may generalize across different sensory modalities, as these studies reported results of ATT (auditory modality) on Stroop or dot-probe tasks (visual modality). Taken together the literature suggests the general conclusion that ATT results in a shift of attention from internal states towards the external, and that this effect may be related to attention flexibility and/or attentional control (Fergus, Bardeen, & Orcutt, 2012). There are as well studies that point out a potential mechanism of ATT in a change of metacognitive beliefs (McEvoy et al., 2017).

  • The regulatory role of attention in PTSD from an information processing perspective

    2020, Emotion in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Etiology, Assessment, Neurobiology, and Treatment
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text