A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics☆
Highlights
► The Dark Triad traits linked to a protean approach to social influence. ► Each trait was associated with unique forms of social influence. ► This protean approach was robust to difference in type of target. ► Effects generally robust to partialing of the Big Five and participant’s sex.
Introduction
How do people like Bernie Madoff and characters like James Bond influence others? How are they able to be successful when they embody the Dark Triad traits (i.e., narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism; Paulhus & Williams, 2002)? Most research has treated these traits as bad for individuals and society (Kowalski, 2001). Indeed, these traits are linked to antisocial tendencies like dishonesty (Lee & Ashton, 2005), aggressiveness (Jones & Paulhus, 2010), disagreeableness (Paulhus & Williams, 2002), and alcohol, cigarette, drug use (Jonason, Koenig, & Tost, 2010). Despite these apparently antisocial correlates, evolutionary psychologists suggest that even undesirable personality traits can be adaptive (i.e., providing solutions to problems like mating or survival), but may be so only on a shorter timescale (Buss, 2009). In the present study, we attempt to understand how those high on the Dark Triad traits may enact a successful fast life strategy.
Life history theory proposes that individual differences are emergent solutions to adaptive problems that are activated by key social and environmental events (Kaplan & Gangestad, 2005). Natural selection may have shaped individuals to adopt mutualistic or antagonistic social strategies in response to differing socioecological conditions (Figueredo et al., 2006). Unfortunately, little is known about the tactical ways individuals enact an antagonistic life strategy. Narcissism is linked to a number of tactics of social influence (Buss & Chiodo, 1991), those high on the Dark Triad are selfish, competitive, and strategic (Jonason et al., 2010, Jones and Paulhus, 2010), and Machiavellianism is characterized by interpersonal manipulation (Christie & Geis, 1970). This suggests to us that these traits might be part of a “cheater strategy” (Jonason et al., 2009, Mealey, 1995).
Taking an evolutionary perspective, we ask, “What is the primary adaptive challenge of anyone enacting a cheater strategy?” The cheater is successful in as much as he/she wins in a co-evolutionary arms race with cheater-detection mechanisms (Cosmides and Tooby, 1992, Cummins, 1999). Most research on cheater-detection is focused on those who would be cheated, not on those who are doing the cheating. The challenge for cheaters may be to avoid detection over repeated exchanges. We would argue that a powerful way to avoid detection is to use a “whatever-it-takes” attitude towards social influence (Gunnthorsdottir, McCabe, & Smith, 2002). By not relying on any one strategy, cheaters may be able to avoid detection. If we assume that people are looking for—and are overly attentive to—patterns in the world, then being protean in the manipulation tactics they deploy may be adaptive. There is considerable advantage noted in the biological literature on the adaptive value of protean behavior or being unpredictable (Driver & Humphries, 1988). Thus, the Dark Triad traits are expected to correlate positively with multiple manipulation tactics.
In particular, we expect each trait to provide a unique approach to social influence, adding to the protean approach to social influence we described above. We expect tactics that are “colder” to be isolated to psychopathy because of the selfish, impulsive, and aggressive nature of those who embody this trait (Hare, 1996, Jones and Paulhus, 2010). The psychopath may use seduction, coercion, and hardball as means of getting her/his way, but these tactics alone likely come with considerable risk. These risks may be offset by other parts of the Dark Triad. Machiavellianism may provide for one important tactic that may have considerable efficacy and limited adverse effects. The tactic of charm may be characteristic of those high on Machiavellianism (Wilson, Near, & Miller, 1996). Similar to Machiavellianism, the narcissistic approach to social influence may provide more benefits than costs. Narcissism has been described as an approach-orientation (Foster & Trimm, 2008) and these individuals may be interested in pleasing others to gain external validation (Bogart, Benotsch, & Pavlovic, 2004). That is, they may do things in hopes of others viewing them favorably. In so doing, they may use tactics like social comparison and reciprocity.
In three studies, we examine how individuals characterized by the Dark Triad traits enact their life history strategy at the tactical level. Study 1 assesses the basic correlations between the Dark Triad and tactics of influence. Study 2 assesses the tactics people use when trying to influence four types of individuals. Study 3 examines the tactics people use when trying to influence four types of individuals in efforts of succeeding at four adaptive goals.
Section snippets
Study 1
As a manifestation of this protean approach to social influence, we expect the Dark Triad traits to be correlated with the use of numerous social influence tactics. As a composite, the Dark Triad should be correlated with a large number of tactical approaches. As individual traits, the Dark Triad should be associated with different tactics of manipulation.
Study 2
Because social influence does not occur in a vacuum, we sought to determine if those high on the Dark Triad traits varied their tactics of influence based on the target. We present individuals with four targets who they are told they need to get help from and assess the correlations between the Dark Triad and tactics of influence across these four targets.
Study 3
Studies 1 and 2 suggest that people with high scores on the Dark Triad might use a range of social influence tactics to manipulate others. Nevertheless, social influence is a goal-oriented behavior and those who score high on the Dark Triad traits may have different goals. In Study 3, after completing the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen, participants were asked to choose one tactic of influence when attempting to solve some adaptive problems. By forcing individuals to make choices, we hoped to reveal
General discussion
If we treat the Dark Triad traits as part of a cheater strategy (Jonason et al., 2009, Mealey, 1995), then we are forced to deal with the question, how does one successfully implement such a strategy? That is, in the face of sophisticated cheater-detection mechanisms, how can one characterized by high levels of these traits successfully navigate a world looking to punish them? Most research on cheater-detection focuses on how individuals detect cheaters as opposed to how cheaters avoid
References (29)
- et al.
Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism
Personality and Individual Differences
(2009) Cheater detection is modified by social rank: The impact of dominance on the evolution of cognitive functions
Evolution and Human Behavior
(1999)- et al.
Consilience and Life History Theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy
Developmental Review
(2006) - et al.
A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains
Journal of Research in Personality
(2003) - et al.
Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game
Journal of Economic Psychology
(2002) - et al.
Mate-selection and the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment
Personality and Individual Differences
(2011) - et al.
Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure
Personality and Individual Differences
(2005) - et al.
The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy
Journal of Research in Personality
(2002) - et al.
Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?
Perspectives on Psychological Science
(2007) - et al.
Feeling superior but threatened: The relation of narcissism to social comparison
Basic and Applied Social Psychology
(2004)
Manipulation in close relationships: Five personality factors in interactional contexts
Journal of Personality
How can evolutionary psychology explain personality and individual differences?
Perspectives in Psychological Science
Narcissistic acts in everyday life
Journal of Personality
Studies in Machiavellianism
Cited by (210)
Paradise for the self-interested? The association between economic inequality and the Dark Triad
2024, Journal of Research in PersonalityDark personality traits and dark tourism sites: Analysis of review generation and consumption behaviors
2023, Tourism Management PerspectivesDark personality traits and sensation-seeking tourist behaviors. Is there a link? A preliminary investigation of Chinese tourists
2023, Tourism Management PerspectivesDark Triad, aggressiveness and influence techniques in romantic relationships
2023, Personality and Individual DifferencesCatching the catfish: Exploring gender and the Dark Tetrad of personality as predictors of catfishing perpetration
2023, Computers in Human Behavior
- ☆
The authors thank Joshua Legarreta, Kayla Whitworth, and Tiffany Rodriguez for data entry work for Study 1.