Elsevier

Maturitas

Volume 107, January 2018, Pages 39-43
Maturitas

Review
Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.07.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse is a recognised although rare complication following both abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy and the risk is increased in women following vaginal surgery for urogenital prolapse.

  • Primary prevention can be performed at the time of hysterectomy.

  • Whilst all women will initially benefit from conservative measures, surgical intervention remains integral in the effective management of women with post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.

  • Women should be counselled carefully regarding the route of surgery, the role of concomitant continence surgery, and the long-term risks which may be associated with the use of abdominal mesh.

  • Given the complexity of the management of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse, these patients are best managed in a tertiary centre within the auspices of a multidisciplinary team that includes urogynaecologists, urologists and colorectal surgeons.

Abstract

Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse (PHVP) is a recognised although rare complication following both abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy and the risk is increased in women following vaginal surgery for urogenital prolapse. The management of PHVP remains challenging and whilst many women will initially benefit from conservative measures, the majority will ultimately require surgery.

The purpose of this paper is to review the prevalence and risk factors associated with PHVP as well to give an overview of the clinical management of this often complicated problem. The role of prophylactic primary prevention procedures at the time of hysterectomy will be discussed as well as initial conservative management.

Surgery, however, remains integral in managing these complex patients and the vaginal and abdominal approach to managing PHVP will be reviewed in detail, in addition to both laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

Introduction

Urogenital prolapse is a common condition which can be distressing and is known to have a significant effect on health related quality of life (HRQoL) [1]. However some degree of prolapse is found on examination in 40%–60% of parous women [2]. Although many women may remain asymptomatic the rate of surgery has been reported to be 10–30 per 10,000 women and this is likely to increase further with an ageing population1. Whilst anterior compartment prolapse is frequently cited as the most common site of urogenital prolapse there is a growing recognition that loss of apical vaginal support may increase the risk of both anterior and posterior compartment prolapse and that failure to adequately support the vaginal vault may lead to surgical failure [2]. Consequently Post Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse (PHVP) may commonly be associated with prolapse in other compartments and may increase the risk of surgical failure.

The aim of this review is to examine the incidence of PHVP as well as associated identifying risk factors. The role of preventative strategies will also be discussed in addition to reviewing the evidence for current conservative and surgical management.

PHVP involves the loss of apical support to the vagina and, by definition can only occur following hysterectomy [3]. It has recently been defined as ‘descent of the apex of the vagina (vaginal vault or cuff scar after hysterectomy) [4]. The degree of PHVP may then be defined and measured objectively using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) system [5] allowing objective clinical staging.

The search terms “apical prolapse” and “vault prolapse” were entered into Pubmed utilising MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from 1996 to present. We included published reports in which outcomes of any management for apical vaginal prolapse were described. We particularly assessed reports where different techniques were compared in randomised studies or as part of a systematic review of surgical interventions (Table 1).

The prevalence of PHVP historically has been reported to range from 0.2% to 43% [6], [7], [8] although more recent data would suggest an incidence of 11.6% following hysterectomy for prolapse and 1.8% for other pathology [9]. Whilst not all women with vaginal vault descent will require surgery a large national study from Austria reporting on 7 645 hysterectomies and 577 procedures for PHVP had estimated a rate of surgical repair of 6%–8% [10].

Section snippets

Risk factors for post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse (PHVP)

The causes of urogenital prolapse are multifactorial and there is some evidence that hysterectomy itself may increase the risk of prolapse. A nationwide Swedish cohort study has demonstrated that 3.2% of women after hysterectomy complained of urogenital prolapse as compared to 2.0% of controls. Of these women, those who underwent vaginal hysterectomy had the highest risk (HR3.8; 95%CI: 3.1–4.8 [11]. These results are also supported by a further Scottish study demonstrating a lower risk of

Contributors

DL conceived and designed the review, conducted the data collection and analysis, and participated in the writing of the manuscript.

GT conducted the data collection and analysis, and participated in the writing of the manuscript.

LC participated in the writing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

DL has acted as an advisor to Astellas, Ferring, Allergan and Ixaltis.

GT has acted as an advisor to Ethicon, and has received travel grants from Astellas.

LC has acted as an advisor to Ethicon, Astellas and Allergan.

Funding

No funding was received for the preparation of this review.

Provenance and peer review

This article has undergone peer review.

References (65)

  • B.T. Haylen et al.

    An International Urogynaecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic pelvic organ prolapse

    Int. Urogynecol. J.

    (2016)
  • R.C. Bump et al.

    The standardisation of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction

    Am. J. Obstet. Gyanecol.

    (1996)
  • J.W. Barrington et al.

    Post hysterectomy vault prolapse

    Int. Urogynaecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

    (2000)
  • P. Toozs-Hobson et al.

    Management of vaginal vaulat prolapse

    Br. J. Obstet. Gyanecol.

    (1998)
  • M. Marchionni et al.

    True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience

    J. Reprod. Med.

    (1999)
  • T. Aigmueller et al.

    An estimation of the frequency of surgery for post hysterectomy vault prolapse

    Int. Urogynaecol. J.

    (2010)
  • D. Altman et al.

    Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomyon benign conditions

    Am. J. Obstet. Gyanecol.

    (2008)
  • K. Cooper et al.

    Outcomes following hysterectomy or endometrial abalation for heavy menstrual bleeding; retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland

    BJOG

    (2011)
  • J. Mant et al.

    Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the oxford family planning association study

    Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.

    (1997)
  • P. Dallenbach et al.

    Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy

    Obstet Gyanecol

    (2007)
  • C. Forsgren et al.

    Effects of hysterectomy on bowel function: a three year prospective cohort study

    Dis. Colon Rectum

    (2007)
  • C. Forsgren et al.

    Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence

    Int. Urogynaecol. J.

    (2012)
  • A.K. Wiskind et al.

    The incidence of genital prolapse after the Burch colposuspension

    Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.

    (1992)
  • P. Kjolhede

    Genital prolapse in women treated successfully and unsuccessfully by the Burch Colposuspension

    Acta Obstet. Gyanecol. Scand.

    (1998)
  • M. Denman et al.

    Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence

    Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.

    (2008)
  • D. Altman et al.

    Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in women with surgically managed rectal prolapse; a population based case control study

    Dis. Colon Rectum

    (2006)
  • A. Digesu et al.

    Inter-observer reliability of digital vaginal examination using a four grade scale in different patient positions

    Int. Urogynaecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

    (2008)
  • A. Digesu et al.

    Validation of the pelvic organ quantification (POPQ) system in left lateral position

    Int. Urogynaecol. J. Pelvic. Floor Dysfunction

    (2009)
  • S. Srikrishna et al.

    Ringing the changes in the evaluation of urogenital prolapse

    Int. Urogynaecol. J.

    (2011)
  • S. Hagen et al.

    Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

    Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.

    (2011)
  • National Institute for Heath and Clinical Excellence

    Sacrocolpopexy Using Mesh for Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair. NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance 283

    (2009)
  • Committee on Practice Bulletins –Gynaecology et al.

    ACOG practice bulletin No. 79. pelvic organ prolapse

    Obstet. Gynaecol.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Mesh-less laparoscopic extraperitoneal linear suspension treatment of vaginal vault prolapse

      2024, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    • Comparison of the vault prolapse rate after vaginal hysterectomy with or without residual uterine ligament ligations: A retrospective cohort study

      2020, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, we tend to instead perform vaginal total hysterectomy (VTH) in women with POP because it is minimally invasive and convenient for concomitant colporrhaphy and anti-incontinence surgeries. The prevalence of post-hysterectomy vault prolapse (PHVP) ranged from 0.2% to 43% in a previous review.10 It was also reported that the incidence of PHVP is 11.6% following hysterectomy for prolapse and 1.8% for other pathologies,11 indicating that different indications for hysterectomy may have different PHVP rates.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text