Journal of Molecular Biology
Volume 357, Issue 3, 31 March 2006, Pages 1039-1049
Journal home page for Journal of Molecular Biology

Kinetic Computational Alanine Scanning: Application to p53 Oligomerization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.083Get rights and content

We have developed a novel computational alanine scanning approach that involves analysis of ensemble unfolding kinetics at high temperature to identify residues that are critical for the stability of a given protein. This approach has been applied to dimerization of the oligomerization domain (residues 326–355) of tumor suppressor p53. As validated by experimental results, our approach has reasonable success in identifying deleterious mutations, including mutations that have been linked to cancer. We discuss a method for determining the effect of mutations on the location of the dimerization transition state.

Introduction

Tumor suppressor p53 is a “gatekeeper” of the genome, functioning at the center of a network of biological pathways that guard the cell from potential cancer. As a multidomain transcription factor, p53 is comprised of an N-terminal activation domain, a central DNA-binding domain, an oligomerization domain, and a C-terminal regulatory domain. The oligomerization domain enables p53 to adopt its biologically active tetrameric form. More than half of human cancers result from mutations in the p53 gene.1 Although most of these mutations are in the DNA-binding domain, several studies have identified mutations within the oligomerization domain (p53tet) that are linked to increased incidence of cancer.2, 3, 4, 5 More cancer-associated mutations may yet be identified in p53tet, due to the fact that this region of the p53 gene was not sequenced in studies that searched for mutations in the p53 DNA-binding domain.3

Structures of p53tet have been determined by both NMR spectroscopy (Protein Data Bank 1PES6 and 1SAK7) and X-ray crystallography (Protein Data Bank 1C268 and 1AIE9). This α/β domain, which is one of the smallest known protein oligomerization domains, assembles as a dimer of dimers.10 Each dimer consists of an antiparallel β-sheet and a pair of antiparallel helices. The two dimers associate with one another to form the active tetramer via an extensive hydrophobic surface that is formed by the antiparallel helices of each dimer. Based on kinetics experiments and Φ-value analysis, tetramerization of p53tet is thought to involve induced-fit associations of monomers to form the dimer intermediates followed by “lock-and-key” associations of preorganized dimers to form the tetramers.10 A recent study of p53 biogenesis in vitro has shown that p53 dimerizes cotranslationally and then forms the tetramer post-translationally.11 Given the kinetic advantage of dimerization before the p53 chains leave the polysome, mutations that affect the kinetics could play important biological roles. Consistent with the importance of kinetics in p53 function, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of p53tet dimerization evolving from the rate-limiting transition state ensemble have revealed a nucleation-condensation mechanism in which L330, I332, and F338 from each monomer form a folding nucleus.12

Because of the structural symmetry of p53, point mutations in the oligomerization domain can reduce the stability of its tetramers significantly. For example, mutation of L330H in the folding nucleus is thought to disrupt the hydrophobic core of the dimers (Figure 1(a)) and has been linked to hepatocarcinoma and ovarian sarcoma.1 As another example, an inherited mutation of R337C is associated with Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome (LFLS), in which the individual is predisposed to form a broad spectrum of tumors, including brain tumors, sarcomas, and adrenal cortical tumors.3 Due to this mutation, the salt-bridges between R337 and D352 across the monomer–monomer interfaces no longer form; four such salt-bridges are lost in the tetramer (Figure 1(a)). The germline mutation of R337H also leads to loss of these salt-bridges and has been associated with pediatric adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC).5 Unlike many cancer-associated mutations in p53, this mutation is tumor-specific, leading only to pediatric ACC. Interestingly, malfunction of the p53 R337H mutant is pH-dependent, occurring only when the histidine residue, which has an elevated pKa, is neutral as opposed to positively charged, when the mutant has near wild-type stability.13

Residues that are critical for the stability of the p53tet tetramer have been identified by systematically replacing nearly every residue in p53tet by alanine (alanine scanning) and experimentally measuring the effect on the stability of the tetramer.14 The most critical of these residues are I332, L330, and F341, which lie in the hydrophobic core of the dimer; truncations of I332 in each of four monomers to alanine residues prevent folding while truncations of either L330 or F341 lead to folding at only high concentrations of protein or low temperature. Other critical residues are L344 and L348, which are located centrally at the tetramer interface; truncation of either residue leads to formation of stable dimers instead of tetramers (Figure 1(b)). To aid in the interpretation of folding kinetics data on p53tet, these mutants have been used as experimental models of the transient dimeric intermediates.10 Residues that are strongly destabilizing when truncated (ΔΔGu of 8.8–11.7 kcal/mol) lie in the periphery of the core (R337, F328, and F338) and at the tetramer interface (M340). Less critical, but still important (ΔΔGu of 4.1–5.7 kcal/mol) are residues that are solvent-exposed (T329), involved in intermonomer hydrogen bonds (R333, N345, E349), or at the tetramer interface (A347).

To provide more efficient, alternative strategies for performing alanine scanning, computational approaches have been developed in recent years. The first computational alanine scanning study involved the MM-PBSA approach, in which molecular dynamics simulations with explicit water were used to generate relevant protein conformations and a continuum solvent model was applied to compute the free energies of the conformations.15 Other computational mutagenesis studies involved the application of energy functions that were parameterized to reproduce experimentally measured changes in stability for a large database of mutations in proteins.16, 17

While the computational mutagenesis approaches that have been developed thus far are based on thermodynamic analyses, the use of kinetic analyses can be effective as well. In particular, kinetic analyses can be used to identify thermodynamically destabilizing mutations if the mutations are also kinetically destabilizing, reducing the barriers to unfolding by destabilizing primarily the native, folded state of the protein. Indeed, it has been found for cancer-associated mutants of the p53 DNA-binding domain that, the more unstable the mutants, the faster they unfold.18 With a few exceptions, destabilizing mutations to alanine residues in p53tet have little effect on unfolding rates of the tetramer, since the rate-limiting transition state to tetramer unfolding, which involves unfolding to the dimer intermediate, is suggested by Φ-value analysis to closely resemble the native tetramer.10 However, these mutations may have a greater effect on unfolding rates of the dimer intermediate, since the transition state to dimer unfolding involves a transition state with near-zero Φ-values10 that have been characterized by simulations as having some unstructured regions and native-like regions that exist as residual structure in the unfolded state.12

Here, we have probed the contributions of individual residues to the thermodynamic stability of the tetramer using a novel, kinetic computational alanine scanning approach that involves high-temperature MD simulations of dimer unfolding. Distributed computing is used to provide necessary statistical precision by running 100 independent unfolding simulations per mutant dimer. We have tested the robustness of this approach by applying it to a test set that consists of the wild-type dimer and six mutant dimers that are either cancer-associated or silent: L330H, R337C, R337H, R337HIP, L344A, and L348A where H and HIP indicate neutral and positively charged histidine, respectively. Our approach has reasonable success in identifying the main cancer-associated mutations in the test set and yields alanine scanning results that are qualitatively consistent with data from experiments.14

Section snippets

Test set

A robust protocol for evaluating unfolding rates was developed using the test set described above (see Methods for details). For each p53tet dimer in the test set, an ensemble of unfolding pathways was generated by performing 100 independent simulations at 470 K for 10 ns. As experimental models of the p53tet dimer,10 the L344A and L348A mutant dimers are likely to have near-wild-type stability and thus, unfolding rates similar to that of the wild-type dimer. On the other hand, the L330H, R337C,

Comparison to previous methods

We have developed a novel computational alanine scanning approach that reliably identifies mutations that destabilize the p53tet dimer. The approach also has reasonable success in identifying the most strongly destabilizing mutations, and is able to determine the effects of mutations that cannot be measured by experiment. While our kinetic approach does not yield results as quantitatively accurate as prior approaches, which are based on thermodynamic analyses,15, 16, 19 it has a number of

Conclusions and Future Work

In conclusion, we have developed a novel, kinetic approach for computational alanine scanning that distinguishes rapidly between kinetically stabilizing and destabilizing mutations. With some exceptions, mutations that thermodynamically destabilize the p53tet tetramer appear to kinetically destabilize the dimer, enabling the identification of seven strongly destabilizing mutations (R333A, R337A, R337C, R337H, L330A, F328A, and E349A) with no false positives. Given these encouraging results, we

Simulation details

Model building and simulations were performed using the GROMACS MD software package26 modified for the Folding@Home distributed computing infrastructure.27 Coordinates of heavy atoms were taken from the crystal structure of p53tet (Protein Data Bank 1AIE)9 in its active tetrameric form to create a starting model of the wild-type dimer (F0 dimer). An alternative, relaxed model (F1 dimer) of the transient dimer intermediate was obtained from room-temperature MD simulations in explicit water that

Acknowledgements

We thank the Folding@Home volunteers who made this work possible. We are grateful for helpful discussions with John Chodera. This work was supported by grants from NSF Molecular Biophysics NIH NIGMS, and CPIMA (an NSF MRSEC).

References (40)

  • R.C. Ribeiro et al.

    An inherited p53 mutation that contributes in a tissue-specific manner to pediatric adrenal cortical carcinoma

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

    (2001)
  • W. Lee et al.

    Solution structure of the tetrameric minimum transforming domain of p53

    Nature Struct. Biol.

    (1994)
  • G.M. Clore et al.

    Refined solution structure of the oligomerization domain of the tumour suppressor p53

    Nature Struct. Biol.

    (1995)
  • P.D. Jeffrey et al.

    Crystal structure of the tetramerization domain of the tumour suppressor p53

    Science

    (1995)
  • P.R. Mittl et al.

    Crystallization and structure solution of p53 (residues 326-356) by molecular replacement using an NMR model as template

    Acta Crystallog. sect. D

    (1998)
  • M.G. Mateu et al.

    Mechanism of folding and assembly of a small tetrameric protein domain from tumor suppressor p53

    Nature Struct. Biol.

    (1999)
  • E.L. DiGiammarino et al.

    A novel mechanism of tumorigenesis involving pH-dependent destabilization of a mutant p53 tetramer

    Nature Struct. Biol.

    (2002)
  • M.G. Mateu et al.

    Nine hydrophobic side chains are key determinants of the thermodynamic stability and oligomerization status of tumor suppressor p53 tetramerization domain

    EMBO J.

    (1998)
  • I. Massova et al.

    Computational alanine scanning to probe protein-protein interactions: a novel approach to evaluate binding free energies

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1999)
  • T. Kortemme et al.

    A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

    (2002)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Chapter 5 Protein Folding Revisited

      2008, Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is not our intent here to promote by detailed review of reports the IBM position, good as it feels in the current world to still see a major commercial organization daringly continuing to contribute to basic science with impact. Lest that continued mission be doubted however, Refs (11–65) are just some of the output relating to IBM's subsequent protein research, much in collaboration with academia. Outside IBM, other projects using grid computing have also yielded persuasive results for peptides and small proteins, and albeit unfairly, actually too numerous to enumerate for present purposes (but see, for example, the continuing efforts described on the Web page of Ref. (66)).

    • Computational alanine scanning and free energy decomposition for E. coli type I signal peptidase with lipopeptide inhibitor complex

      2008, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Molecular Mechanics Poisson Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA)/Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born Surface Area (MM-GBSA) approaches have recently become of interest in drug discovery for calculating binding affinities of biomolecular complexes, based on molecular dynamics (MD) of the given protein–ligand complex in explicit solvent [10–18]. Computational alanine scanning involving the MM-PBSA method [18–23] and free energy decomposition involving the MM-GBSA method [24,25] have been developed to investigate the binding modes in detail at the atomic level and also to estimate protein stabilities [26]. In the MM-PBSA approach, the binding free energy is estimated as the sum of the gas-phase energies, solvation free energies and entropic contributions, averaged over a series of snapshots from MD trajectories.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text