Morphometric and meristic diversity of the species Scolopendra cingulata Latreille, 1829 (Chilopoda: Scolopendridae) in the Mediterranean region

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2010.11.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Scolopendra cingulata Latreille, 1829 is the commonest scolopendromorph species in the Mediterranean area. However, its morphological and geographic variation has not been examined so far, and therefore robust hypotheses about the factors that have shaped that variability are lacking. We examined, using multivariate methods for 19 morphometric and meristic characters, the morphological variation of that species using a comprehensive sample of 503 adult specimens from 130 restricted geographic localities. The localities were distributed in three major geographic areas (Balkans, Asia Minor-Middle East, and Italy) in order to discern biological entities and to estimate the morphological relationships between populations and geographic regions. Results showed significant differences between the three geographic groups. Characters such as the distance between the paramedian sulci of the 7th and 8th tergite, the number of antennal segments, the number of spines on the dorsal side of 21st prefemur and number of spines on the 21st prefemoral process significantly discriminated populations of S. cingulata along a west–east geographic gradient. Both eastern (Balkan) and easternmost populations (Asia Minor-Middle East) showed higher mean values of antennal articles and spines of 21st prefemur than the Italian populations. No significant morphological variation was discovered between the sexes of S. cingulata apart from cephalic width and distance between the two paramedian sulci of the 7th and 8th tergite. Based on certain morphometric differences among the three major geographic regions, we suggest that S. cingulata originated in the east and colonized south European area from two different geographic routes. It is suggested that west–east morphological trend of S. cingulata is related either to the prominent palaeogeographic events of the area or to the competition with S. oraniensis Lucas, 1846 in the western Mediterranean.

Introduction

Morphological variation is often attributed to differential adaptations to diverse habitats. Therefore, the study of intraspecific morphological variation is a necessary tool to understand the diversity of life, and to examine if morphological variability can be attributed to selection by ecological and environmental factors or is the result of palaeogeographic history (Adams et al., 2004, Kamilari and Sfenthourakis, 2009).

The evolution of a dynamic geological system such as that of the Mediterranean region has affected the distribution of many terrestrial animals. Mediterranean is characterized by numerous and occasionally complex geographic events in the past (Roegl and Steininger, 1983) (Fig. 1). Therefore, in modern phylogeographic studies, the Mediterranean represents a model area from which to infer intra- and interpopulation variation among geographically distinct areas, such as the Balkan, Anatolian, Middle Eastern and Italian peninsulas. In particular, spatially and temporally fragmented habitats (e.g. islands, mountainous peaks) are used to understand evolutionary processes that might provide answers on species and/or population variability. There are numerous works using molecular data in conjunction with the palaeogeography of the Mediterranean area to study population differentiation among land snails (Douris et al., 1995, Parmakelis, 2003), scorpions (Parmakelis et al., 2006) and vertebrates (Poulakakis et al., 2003, Kasapidis et al., 2005, Kornilios et al., 2005, Poulakakis et al., 2005, Thanou et al., 2005, Tryfonopoulos et al., 2008). However, morphological phylogeographic studies are few although multivariate morphometric analysis has been shown to demonstrate complex, multidimensional patterns of variation and has been proved to be a powerful and reliable method for analyzing intraspecific relations. There are few such works, dealing with beetles (Chatzimanolis et al., 2003), butterflies (Dennis et al., 2000), snails (Giokas, 2000) and vertebrates (Tsekoura et al., 2002, Fraguedakis-Tsolis et al., 2009).

Based on the Chilobase (an electronic database, publicly and freely available through the World Wide Web – http://chilobase.bio.unipd.it/, last updated 2006), the order Chilopoda comprises around 3500 valid species out of an estimated global fauna of approximately 8000 species (Adis and Harvey, 2000). There are nearly 700 species of scolopendromorph centipedes worldwide (Chilobase, 2006). The Scolopendridae is one of the largest families in the Order Scolopendromorpha, including approximately 10% of the world's centipede diversity (Menon et al., 2003). The family has been the subject of research around the world (for example Schileyko and Minelli, 1998, Shelley and Kiser, 2000, Chagas-Jr, 2001, Shelley, 2002, Shelley, 2006, Shelley et al., 2005). The commonest genus within the family Scolopendridae (Newport, 1894) is the genus Scolopendra (Linnaeus, 1758). Species of Scolopendra Linnaeus, 1758 are widespread in all tropical, subtropical and warm temperate areas (Lewis, 1981). Until recently, the taxonomy of Scolopendra was based exclusively on external morphology. Würmli, 1978, Würmli, 1980 produced a comprehensive taxonomic revision of Scolopendra species (canidens group), examining thousands of specimens and identifying, for the first time, 21 qualitative and quantitative morphological characters. However, more recent studies have concentrated on the systematics and distribution of certain Scolopendra species (Shelley, 2002, Shelley, 2006, Shelley et al., 2005). Simaiakis and Mylonas (2008) have shown that there are nine species distributed in the Mediterranean region. Among them Scolopendra cingulata (Latreille, 1829) is the most widely distributed species, and it also occurs in western Asia.

The main aim of this work was the investigation and explanation of the patterns of morphological variation of S. cingulata in the southern Mediterranean region, in relation to the geography and palaeogeography of that area. We used sample material collected from sites that provide comprehensive coverage of the main distributional range of S. cingulata in the Mediterranean. We examined these samples using, for first time in that species, multivariate analyses for a series of established and new quantitative morphological characters (morphometric and meristic). We sought to improve the statistical accuracy and reliability and also to identify the major morphological characteristics that differentiate geographic groups within that species, and to look for possible morphological adaptations related to the diversification processes in this taxon.

Section snippets

Sample collection

Samples of S. cingulata were collected by hand or by pitfall traps during the annual wet periods (September–December and March–May) from three major geographic areas: (a) the Balkan peninsula (89 restricted sites), (b) Minor Asia and Middle East (25 restricted sites) and (c) the Italian peninsula (16 restricted sites) (Appendix A). The geographic units were grouped based on the palaeogeography of the Mediterranean area (see Fig. 1). Specimens were mainly found under stones, among leaf litter,

Results

Supplementary material (Appendix B) summarizes for each geographic region all measured morphological characteristics of the 503 S. cingulata samples (sex ratio is also given).

Previous biometrical studies

Multivariate quantitative analysis of morphology has not been used for centipedes before. In particular, while there are numerous studies on scolopendrids emphasizing systematics (Lewis, 1989, Lewis, 2003, Shelley, 2002), checklists (Khanna, 2001, Lewis, 2001a, Shelley, 2006) as well as faunistic and distributional aspects (Szalay, 1956, Lewis, 1985, Lewis, 1996, Lewis, 2001b, Lewis and Gallagher, 1993, Zapparoli, 2002, Akkari et al., 2008, Simaiakis and Mylonas, 2008), there appears to be

Acknowledgements

This research project has been funded mainly by the European Commission's Research Infrastructure Action via the SYNTHESYS Project and partly by the University of Bergen (Bergen Museum). We are grateful to Paul Harding and three anonymous referees for providing valuable comments in a previous draft. We wish to thank John Lewis and Greg Edgecombe for offering valuable taxonomic recommendations. We also thank Henrik Enghoff from the Zoological Museum of Copenhagen and Alessandro Minelli from the

References (68)

  • W.R. Dillon et al.

    Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications

    (1984)
  • V. Douris et al.

    Mitochondrial DNA and morphological differentiation of Albinaria populations (Gastropoda: Clausiliidae)

    J. Mollus. Stud.

    (1995)
  • G.D. Edgecombe et al.

    Phylogeny of scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda): morphological analysis featuring characters from the peristomatic area

    Cladistics

    (2008)
  • G.D. Edgecombe et al.

    The contribution of preoral chamber and foregut morphology to the phylogenetics of Scolopendromorpha (Chilopoda). Soil organism

  • S.E. Fraguedakis-Tsolis et al.

    Morphological variation of the five vole species of the genus Microtus (Mammalia, Rodentia, Avricolinae) occurring in Greece

    Acta Zool.

    (2009)
  • S. Giokas

    Congruence and conflict in Albinaria (Gastropoda, Clausiliidae). A review of morphological and molecular phylogenetic approaches

    Bel. J. Zool.

    (2000)
  • R. Hair et al.

    Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings

    (1996)
  • Ø. Hammer et al.

    PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis

    Palaeont. Electr.

    (2001)
  • J.M. Humphries et al.

    Multivariate discrimination by shape in relation to size

    Syst. Zool.

    (1981)
  • B.S. Jangi

    Some aspects of the morphology of the centipede Scolopendra morsitans Linn. (Scolopendridae)

    Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.

    (1955)
  • B.S. Jangi

    Further notes on the taxonomy of the centipede Scolopendra morsitans Linnaeus (Scolopendridae)

    Entomol. News

    (1959)
  • B.S. Jangi

    The Indian Zoological Memoirs on Indian Animal Types: Scolopendra (The Indian centipede)

    (1966)
  • M. Kamilari et al.

    A morphometric approach to the geographic variation of the terrestrial isopod species Armadillo tuberculatus (Isopoda: Oniscidea)

    J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res.

    (2009)
  • V. Khanna

    A checklist of the Indian species of the scolopendrid centipedes (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha)

    Ann. Forest.

    (2001)
  • P. Kornilios et al.

    Allozyme variation in populations of the karyotypically polymorphic vole Microtus (Terricola) thomasi (Mammalia, Rodentia) from Greece

    Bel. J. Zool.

    (2005)
  • Z. Korsós et al.

    Az öves szkolopendra (Scolopendra cingulata Latr., 1829) magyarországi állományainak helyzete (On the Hungarian populations of Scolopendra cingulata)

    Termész. Közlemén.

    (2006)
  • M.A. Lawing et al.

    Coding meristic characters for phylogenetic analysis: a comparison of step-matrix gap-weighting and generalized frequency coding

    Syst. Biol.

    (2008)
  • J.G.E. Lewis

    The taxonomy and biology of the centipede Scolopendra amazonica in the Sudan

    J. Zool.

    (1966)
  • J.G.E. Lewis

    The scolopendromorph centipedes of the Sudan with remarks on taxonomic characters in the Scolopendridae

    Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond.

    (1967)
  • J.G.E. Lewis

    Individual variation in a population of the centipede Scolopendra amazonica from Nigeria and its implications for methods of taxonomic discrimination in the Scolopendridae

    Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Lond.

    (1968)
  • J.G.E. Lewis

    The variation of the centipede Scolopendra amazonica in Africa

    Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Lond.

    (1969)
  • J.G.E. Lewis

    The biology of Scolopendra amazonica in Nigerian Guinea Savannah

    Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat.

    (1970)
  • J.G.E. Lewis

    Variation in tropical scolopendrid centipedes: problems for the taxonomist

    Abh. Geb. Naturw. Hamburg

    (1978)
  • J.G.E. Lewis

    The Biology of Centipedes

    (1981)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Presence of morphological integration and modularity of the forcipular apparatus in Lithobius melanops (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae)

      2022, Arthropod Structure and Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      In general, morphological integration and modularity have been insufficiently investigated in Myriapoda. In centipedes, the morphological variation of the forcipular apparatus was analyzed using meristic counts (Simaiakis et al., 2011), traditional (Dugon et al., 2012) and geometric morphometrics (Siriwut et al., 2015; Baiocco et al., 2017; Zarei and Seifali, 2020). This study represents the first investigation of the presence of morphological integration and modularity in Chilopoda using the geometric morphometric approach.

    • Variation in venom yield and protein concentration of the centipedes Scolopendra polymorpha and Scolopendra subspinipes

      2014, Toxicon
      Citation Excerpt :

      We obtained morphometric measurements prior to venom extraction from digital photographs of CO2-anesthetized animals. Measures included: body length (distance between the anterior margin of the cephalic plate and the posterior margin of the postpedal tergite, excluding the caudal legs, to nearest 1 mm; Shelley, 2002; Simaiakis et al., 2011); forcipule width (mean of left and right forcipule widths, measured as distance between the medial and lateral margins of the trochanteroprefemur in line with the anterior margin of the forcipular coxosternite, to nearest 0.01 mm; Fig. 2A; cf. Dugon et al., 2012); and forcipule length (mean of left and right forcipule lengths, measured as distance between a line drawn through the most posterior attachment points of the trochanteroprefemora with the forcipular coxosternite and a parallel line at the anterior tip of the tarsungulum, to nearest 0.01 mm; Fig. 2A). Although forcipule length, by our definition, varies with degree of articulation of forcipular joints, all photographs were of anesthetized animals; therefore, forcipule length was consistently measured with forcipules in the resting (i.e., folded rather than extended) position.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text