Foodstuff placement in ibis mummies and the role of viscera in embalming

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.01.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent excavation of a mummified ibis, in whose bill were found numerous snails, and the 2010 radiological study of ibis mummies from Yale's Peabody Museum drew attention to the presence of bird foodstuffs intentionally placed inside mummified ibises following evisceration. The foodstuff packing in the Peabody's ibises was likely contained within the birds' own viscera. Radiographs of a hatchling ibis mummy at McGill's Redpath Museum demonstrated similar placement of foodstuffs within the eviscerated body cavity. This pattern of ibis evisceration, with the previously unreported practice of foodstuff packing, suggests the provision of an afterlife food source to the bird. These findings lend support to the idea that the viscera of ibises, and humans alike, were meant to continue their living function in the afterlife. Given that organs of digestion and respiration were specifically preserved and retained within, or in conjunction with, human mummies, the implication is that animals were also treated with similar respect and care, and the crucial role of the viscera was recognised.

Highlights

► Demonstrates organ removal in ibises, which is generally considered rare. ► Pattern includes previously unreported practice of foodstuff packing. ► Foodstuffs suggest the provision of an afterlife food source to the bird. ► Supports idea that viscera were meant to function in the afterlife. ► Demonstrates degree to which animals were treated equally to humans in death.

Introduction

The Sacred Ibis (Threskiornis aethiopicus – Fig. 1) is now extinct in Egypt, but was commonly mummified in ancient times for votive offerings to gain the favour of Thoth, the god of writing and wisdom (Aufderheide, 2003; Morgan and McGovern-Huffman, 2008; Nicholson, 2005). Thousands have been excavated at Abydos (Ikram, 2007; Whittemore, 1914), as many as 1.75 million birds are present at Saqqara (as estimated by Nick Fieller, information provided by a personal communication of Paul Nicholson, director of the excavations of the ibis catacombs), and more than four million were found in the catacombs of Tuna-el-Gebel (El Mahdy, 1989; Kessler and Nur el-Din, 2005).

Organ removal in the mummification process of ibises is generally considered as an uncommon practice; an early account of the unwrapping of two mummified Egyptian ibises (Pearson, 1805) supports the idea that evisceration was rarely conducted in ibis mummies. Pearson's study attributed “a soft spongy substance, lying quite loose, containing a great number of scarabaei” (1805:270) to intact viscera, and Pearson cites a similar account of reptile skin and scales in another mummified ibis (Cuvier, 1804).

However, the 2006 excavation of a Late Period mummified ibis from the Shuneh ez Zebib at Abydos (unpublished, identification by S.I.), whose bill contained numerous snails (Fig. 1); an ibis mummy at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, exhibiting a similar beak packing arrangement (in preparation, identified by S.I.); and the radiological study of ibis mummies from Yale's Peabody Museum, drew further attention to ibis evisceration and to the presence of bird foodstuffs apparently intentionally placed in mummified ibises. Subsequent radiographic examination of an ibis mummy at McGill's Redpath Museum, demonstrated a similar placement of foodstuffs in the eviscerated body cavity.

The increased study of ibis and other animal mummies using state-of-the-art radiographic techniques (i.e., digital radiography, multi-detector computed tomography, etc.) has permitted researchers to examine ibis mummification more closely and without risking damage to the mummy. Three-dimensional imaging especially provides a clear view of the interior of the mummy, and is ideal for examining the contents and modifications to the body cavity. A pattern of ibis evisceration with the curious, and previously unreported, practice of foodstuff packing was revealed by our radiographic studies and suggests the provision of an afterlife food source for the bird.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The ibises were studied using computed tomography (CT) which, because it is non-destructive, neither damages the mummy nor disturbs the anatomical relationships within the bird. Computed tomography studies of mummified remains allow for detailed three-dimensional evaluations without the difficulties of superimposition that characterise plain film radiographs. Three-dimensional visualisations, multi-planar reformatted images (MPR), maximum intensity projections (MIP), and curve-linear

Peabody ibis ANT.006924.002 (Abydos, Roman Period, 30 BC–300 AD)

ANT.006924.002, identified as the Sacred Ibis T. aethiopicus (Wade, 2010), has been wrapped with its head inverted, its neck stretched ventrally along the body, and its bill running beneath the tail feathers (Fig. 2A). The wings and legs are folded close against the body. Substantial amounts of resin (or resin-like material) are apparent around the bill and legs, and the bird is wrapped in a few layers of resin-impregnated linen surrounded by further layers of plain linen.

The entire body cavity

Discussion

Although the ibises discussed here vary in age-at-death, position, resin treatment, and ornamentation, they all contain bird foodstuffs placed in the body cavity. It is very likely that, in the case of ANT.006924.002 and ANT.006924.004, that the gizzards that had been removed during evisceration were returned to the body as they were, filled with their original contents. Although the body cavity of the hatchling ibis (RM2727.01), from the Redpath collection has been filled with grain following

Conclusions

The intentional internal placement of bird foodstuffs in votive ibis mummies following evisceration is a previously unappreciated aspect of the animal mummification tradition in ancient Egypt. The finding of foodstuffs placed in these birds, still in the bird's gizzard, lends support to the idea that the viscera of ibises and humans alike were meant to continue their living function in the afterlife. In humans, the preservation of the viscera in canopic jars, or in linen bundles returned to the

Acknowledgments

We thank Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., the Quinnipiac University Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Bioanthropology Research Institute, and the Montreal Neurological Institute for access to their CT scanners and technical assistance; Tania Blyth, Bernadette Mele, Natalie Pelletier, and Emily Rouillard for technical assistance; Drs. D O'Connor and M Adams for inviting Dr. Ikram to work on their project; and Drs. D. Arnold and M. Hill for giving Dr. Ikram access to the animal mummies

References (13)

  • A.C. Aufderheide

    The Scientific Study of Mummies

    (2003)
  • G. Cuvier

    Mémoire sur l'ibis des anciens Egyptiens

    Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle

    (1804)
  • C. El Mahdy

    Mummies, Myth and Magic in Ancient Egypt

    (1989)
  • S. Ikram et al.

    The Mummy in Ancient Egypt: Equipping the Dead for Eternity

    (1998)
  • S. Ikram

    Animals in a ritual context at Abydos: a synopsis

  • D. Kessler et al.

    Tuna al-Gebel: Millions of Ibises and Other Animals

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text