Review
Treatments for psoriasis and the risk of malignancy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.12.031Get rights and content

Background

There are multiple therapeutic options for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. The process of choosing among potential treatment options requires both the physician and the patient to weigh the benefits of individual modalities against their potential risks. Traditional systemic therapies for psoriasis, including methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine (CsA), have a well-documented array of toxicities, particularly end-organ toxicities. Over the past several years, the use of biologic therapies for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis has been a major clinical and research focus. With the advent of these novel immunosuppressive therapies, one of the central safety issues surrounding these agents is their potential to increase the risk of malignancy.

Objective

Our objective was to review the risk of malignancy associated with therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, including phototherapy, traditional systemic therapies, and biologic therapies. We reviewed the existing body of literature in order to define the known incidence of malignancy associated with psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA), narrowband and broadband ultraviolet B (UVB), MTX, CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and biologic therapies, including alefacept, efalizumab, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab.

Results

PUVA, when given long term, is associated with increased risks of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma. Reviews of studies on UVB, both narrowband and broadband, do not indicate any increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer or melanoma. The traditional systemic psoriasis therapies—MTX, CsA, and MMF—may be associated with an increased risk of lymphoproliferative disorders during treatment, demonstrated in clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and documented in case reports concerning psoriasis patients. The risk of malignancy with biologic therapy is still unclear. However, the majority of studies examining this carcinogenic risk suggest that tumor necrosis factor–α inhibitors may cause a slightly increased risk of cancer, including nonmelanoma skin cancer and hematologic malignancies.

Limitations

The majority of studies cited in this review lack the power and randomization of large clinical trials, as well as the long-term follow-up periods which would further substantiate the hypothetical link between these antipsoriatic treatment regimens and the potential for malignancy. Because of the substantial lack of clinical data, the majority of studies evaluated focus on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, which is a systemic inflammatory disorder comparable to psoriasis. Additionally, the increased risk of malignancy associated with psoriasis itself is a confounding factor.

Conclusion

Many of the therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, including PUVA, traditional systemic therapies, and some biologic therapies, may increase the risk of malignancy. Appropriate patient counseling and selection, as well as clinical follow-up, are necessary to maximize safety with these agents. Further long-term study is necessary to more precisely quantify the risks associated with biologic therapies.

Introduction

Psoriasis is a relatively common inflammatory disease of the skin and joints, which has been shown to affect approximately 2% of the general population in the United States.1 While psoriasis can occur at any age, for many clinical symptoms present by early adulthood. Psoriasis can develop into a chronic, debilitating disease which markedly impacts quality of life and contributes significantly to health care costs.2 Moderate to severe psoriasis often necessitates life-long alternating systemic therapies in order to alleviate symptoms. In recent years the expanding armamentarium of therapeutic options available to the patient with moderate to severe psoriasis has permitted physicians to more aggressively combat the inflammation central to this disease's pathogenesis. In addition to the long-standing assortment of systemic therapies, such as psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA), narrowband and broadband ultraviolet B (UVB), methotrexate (MTX), cyclosporine (CsA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), much attention has recently been devoted to the new biological therapies which target T cells and modify immune responses. While several of these therapies have shown promise in effectively controlling psoriasis, there is the potential for systemic toxicity with these therapies related to their immunosuppressive effects, including serious infections and increased risk for malignancy.

The debate as to whether or not these systemic treatments do in fact increase a patient's risk of malignancy remains largely unresolved and has been further confounded by the premise that psoriasis, being a chronic inflammatory disorder comparable to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Crohn's disease, may also inherently place the patient at a higher likelihood of developing certain cancers. The pathophysiology of psoriasis involves an abnormal immune activation characterized by the increased activity of T cells, antigen-presenting cells (ie, dendritic cells and Th1 cytokines), and B lymphocytes.3, 4, 5

Section snippets

Association of the disease state and malignancy

Various studies have attempted to elucidate whether this broad-spectrum activation of the immune system is associated with increased cancer risks. The large retrospective cohort study by Margolis et al6 employed data from a Medicaid database in an effort to compare cancer rates in those suffering from psoriasis to those diagnosed with hypertension. The hypertensive population was selected as a control, as these patients were considered most likely to represent the true population rate of

Psoralen and ultraviolet A

Since its initial development in 1974, oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy (PUVA) has been used widely as a very effective means of inducing remission of psoriasis.9 PUVA intercalates into the DNA double helix and thereby generates highly mutagenic DNA-distorting photoproducts which halt the rapidly dividing psoriatic epidermis. However, UV radiation has been shown to exhibit immunosuppressive effects that may contribute to tumor progression (Table I).10, 11, 12, 13 The risk of skin cancer

Association of biologics and malignancy

The biologics, which represent new developments in genetic engineering and biotechnology, include T-cell modulators (alefacept and efalizumab) as well as the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) antagonists (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab). These bioengineered proteins target specific steps in the pathogenesis of several immune-mediated disorders including psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.74

Preclinical data using an experimental animal tumor model75 has shown anti-TNF-α antibodies to hinder

Conclusion

As the data emerge, it has become clear that psoriasis itself places the patients at risk for malignancy. Compounding this reality with medications that may additionally have carcinogenic properties represents a quandary which the practicing dermatologist may frequently encounter. While long-term PUVA therapy is associated with an increased risk of SCC and melanoma, a review of the literature on ultraviolet therapy confirms that UVB has no apparent association with an increased incidence of

References (131)

  • J.L. Lim et al.

    High levels of ultraviolet B exposure increase the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer in psoralen and ultraviolet A-treated patients

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2005)
  • C.T. Ebeo et al.

    Methotrexate-induced pulmonary lymphoma

    Chest

    (2003)
  • I.T. Cockburn et al.

    The risk of neoplasms in patients treated with cyclosporine A

    J Autoimmun

    (1989)
  • J.Y. Koo et al.

    The development of B-cell lymphoma in a patient with psoriasis treated with cyclosporine

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1992)
  • C.F. Paul et al.

    Risk of malignancies in psoriasis patients treated with cyclosporine: a 5 y cohort study

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2003)
  • J.D. Lelievre et al.

    Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disease after long-standing cyclosporine therapy for psoriasis: a case of spontaneous regression

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2005)
  • E.L. Jones et al.

    Treatment of psoriasis with oral mycophenolic acid

    J Invest Dermatol

    (1975)
  • E.C. Gomez et al.

    Efficacy of mycophenolic acid for the treatment of psoriasis

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1979)
  • A.C. Allison et al.

    Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action

    Immunopharmacology

    (2000)
  • W.W. Epinette et al.

    Mycophenolic acid for psoriasis. A review of pharmacology, long-term efficacy, and safety

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1987)
  • H.J. Eisen et al.

    Three-year results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in cardiac transplant recipients

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2005)
  • N. Larmonier et al.

    The inhibition of TNF-α anti-tumoral properties by clocking antibodies promotes tumor growth in a rat model

    Exp Cell Res

    (2007)
  • A. Gilhar et al.

    T lymphocyte dependence of psoriatic pathology in human psoriatic skin grafted to SCID mice

    J Invest Dermatol

    (1997)
  • A.B. Gottlieb

    Immunologic mechanisms in psoriasis

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1988)
  • A.B. Gottlieb et al.

    Anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris: results of pilot, multicenter, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled study

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2000)
  • L.G. Morse et al.

    Cervical cancer in a woman associated with long-term efalizumab therapy

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2005)
  • G. Kruger et al.

    The impact of psoriasis on quality of life: results of a 1998 National Psoriasis Foundation patient-membership survey

    Arch Dermatol

    (2001)
  • J.C. Krueger et al.

    Psoriasis pathophysiology: current concepts of pathogenesis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2005)
  • F. Mahmoud et al.

    Elevated B-lymphocyte levels in lesional tissue of non-arthritic psoriasis

    J Dermatol

    (1999)
  • D. Margolis et al.

    The risk of malignancy associated with psoriasis

    Arch Dermatol

    (2001)
  • J.M. Gelfand et al.

    Lymphoma rates are low but increased in patients with psoriasis

    Arch Dermatol

    (2003)
  • J.A. Parrish et al.

    Photochemotherapy of psoriasis with oral methoxsalen and long wave ultraviolet light

    N Engl J Med

    (1974)
  • M.L. Kripke

    Antigenicity of murine skin tumors induced by ultraviolet light

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1974)
  • T. Schwarz

    [Effects of ultraviolet radiation on immunity]

    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges

    (2003)
  • R.S. Stern et al.

    Oral psoralen and ultraviolet-A light (PUVA) treatment of psoriasis and persistent risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1998)
  • N.H. Cox et al.

    Cutaneous and ocular side effects of oral photochemotherapy: the results of an 8-year follow up study

    Br J Dermatol

    (1987)
  • A.R. Rhodes et al.

    The PUVA-induced pigmented macule: a lentiginous proliferation of large, sometimes cytologically atypical melanocytes

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1985)
  • K.J. MacDonald et al.

    Longitudinal melanonychia during photochemotherapy

    Br J Dermatol

    (1986)
  • R.S. Stern et al.

    Malignant melanoma in patients treated for psoriasis with methoxsalen (Psoralen) and ultraviolet A radiation (PUVA)

    N Engl J Med

    (1997)
  • J. Lock-Anderson et al.

    Eye and hair colour, skin type and constitutive skin pigmentation as risk factors for basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous malignant melanoma: a Danish case-control study

    Acta Derm Venerol

    (1999)
  • B. Lindelof

    Risk of melanoma with psoralen/ultraviolet A therapy for psoriasis, do the known risks now outweigh the benefits

    Drug Safety

    (1999)
  • R.S. Stern et al.

    The carcinogenic risk of treatments for severe psoriasis

    Cancer

    (1994)
  • R.S. Stern

    Lymphoma risk in psoriasis

    Arch Dermatol

    (2006)
  • H. van Weelden et al.

    A new development in UVB phototherapy of psoriasis

    Br J Dermatol

    (1988)
  • N.K. Gibbs et al.

    Comparative potency of broadband and narrowband phototherapy sources to induce edema, sunburn cells, and urocanic acid photoisomerization in hairless mouse skin

    Photochem Photobiol

    (1993)
  • M. Weischer et al.

    No evidence for increased skin cancer risk in psoriasis patients treated with broadband or narrowband UVB phototherapy: a first retrospective study

    Acta Derm Venereol

    (2004)
  • R.S. Stern et al.

    The carcinogenic risk of treatments for severe psoriasis

    Cancer

    (1994)
  • I. Man et al.

    The photocarcinogenic risk of narrowband UVB (TL-01) phototherapy: early follow-up data

    Br J Dermatol

    (2005)
  • R.M. Hearn et al.

    Incidence of skin cancers in 3867 patients treated with narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy

    Br J Dermatol

    (2008)
  • R.S. Stern et al.

    Methotrexate used for psoriasis and the risk of noncutaneous or cutaneous malignancy

    Cancer

    (1982)
  • Cited by (193)

    • Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Melanoma

      2020, Surgical Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) is used for treatment of psoriasis, eczema, and vitiligo and is associated with development of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. Patel and colleagues24 noted that the risk of squamous cell carcinoma is increased by 100-fold in patients undergoing greater than 330 treatments, and the risk of developing malignant melanomas post-PUVA is even greater, as patients were at increased risk after 250 treatments. Certain skin, hair, and eye color phenotypes are associated with increased sun sensitivity and risk of skin cancer development.

    • Interleukin 12/23 Inhibitors

      2020, Comprehensive Dermatologic Drug Therapy, Fourth Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding sources: None.

    Disclosure: Miss Patel and Dr Clark have no conflicts of interest to declare. Dr Lebwohl has been a consultant and speaker for Abbott, Amgen, Astellas, Centocor, Genentech, Stiefel, and UCB Pharma. Dr Weinberg has served as a speaker for Abbott, Amgen, and Genentech.

    View full text