Trends in Immunology
Volume 26, Issue 8, August 2005, Pages 447-454
Journal home page for Trends in Immunology

NLRs join TLRs as innate sensors of pathogens

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2005.06.004Get rights and content

Pathogen-recognition receptors (PRRs) are key components of immune systems and are involved in innate effector mechanisms and activation of adaptive immunity. Since their discovery in vertebrates, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have become the focus of extensive research that has revealed their significance in the regulation of many facets of our immune system. What makes TLRs so central and fascinating is their ability to recognize microbes and directly initiate specific signal transduction cascades that alert the host defences. In this review, we discuss the function and biology of a new family of PRRs, the NACHT-LRRs (NLRs), which include both nucleotide-binding oligomerization domains (NODs) and NALPs [NACHT-, LRR- and pyrin domain (PYD)-containing proteins], and underline some intriguing similarities between NLRs and TLRs that emphasize the role of NLRs as a complementary system for host–microbe interactions.

Introduction

Innate immunity was thought formerly to be a non-specific immune response characterized by engulfment and digestion of microorganisms and foreign substances by macrophages and leukocytes. However, innate immunity acts with substantial specificity and is adept at discrimination between pathogens and self. Since the early nineties, Charles Janeway and his collaborators have proposed that the innate immune system can recognize key molecular signatures borne by pathogens, called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [1]. These patterns represent molecules vital for microbial survival and are therefore unlikely to vary in their structures because any major changes would be disadvantageous. Such molecules include bacterial structural components, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and peptidoglycans (PGNs), or viral RNA. Janeway predicted that host organisms develop a group of receptors that recognize these PAMPs, referred to as pathogen-recognition receptors (PRRs).

PAMPs are not the only trigger of innate immunity. Innate immunity can recognize abnormal self or danger signals, such as DNA, RNA or uric acid, which should not normally be present outside cells or at certain locations within the cell 2, 3. This proposed mechanism, also known as the ‘danger model’, is well illustrated in the case of the high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein, a nuclear factor and secreted protein. In the cell nucleus, HMGB1 acts as an architectural chromatin-binding factor; however, outside the cell, it binds to RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end-products), activates TLRs and is a potent mediator of inflammation 4, 5. Although the models of recognition of pathogen molecular patterns and the ‘danger model’ often appear to be opposed, they are not mutually exclusive because both systems might be necessary and might use the same collection of PRRs, converging on the same basic mechanism of activating inflammation and the adaptive immune system.

The activation of PRRs can lead to mobilization of soluble defence molecules, killing of the infected cells or tissues, acquisition of specialized functions by sentinel cells, induction of co-stimulatory molecules by antigen-presenting cells, and many other physiological responses. One of the modes of action of PRRs is the transcription activation [e.g. by the NF-κB or interferon-β (IFN-β) pathway], resulting in mobilization of the effectors of inflammation. Several of these PRRs have been identified; Toll-like receptors (TLRs) being the most studied [6]. Being transmembrane receptors, TLRs survey the extracellular fluids, including endosomal compartments, and have an important role in cross-presentation of particular pathogens to lymphocytes [7] (for more detailed information on TLRs, excellent reviews have been published recently 8, 9). Although it is well established that TLRs are key innate immune sensors, the recent discovery of novel PRR family members that are able to activate NF-κB or IFN-β suggests that some TLR-elicited responses might be redundant with similar signaling cascades triggered by other PRRs 10, 11, 12. Interestingly, this hypothesis is supported by the unexpected observation that patients devoid of functional IRAK4, an important kinase for TLR signaling, show a relatively mild disease phenotype because they have a limited and transient susceptibility to infection by only a few pyogenic bacteria during childhood [13].

Here, we will review the function and biology of a family of recently identified intracellular PRRs, namely the NACHT [domain present in neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP), CIITA, HET-E and TP1]-LRRs (NLRs), whose emerging function is to detect intracellular pathogens or danger signals in general (Table 1). In particular, we focus on recent insights gained into the emerging roles of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domains (NODs) and NALP3 [NACHT-, LRR- and pyrin domain (PYD)-containing protein 3] in inflammation. For more general reviews on NLRs, we refer to two recently published articles 12, 14.

Section snippets

Intracellular PRRs: the NLRs

Innate immunity is not only capable of detecting extracellular pathogens and danger through TLRs and other membrane-bound PRRs but can also sense their presence in the cytoplasm with great efficiency. For example, the presence of viral RNA is detected by RIG-I, which leads to the activation of classical immune defence systems, such as NF-κB and IFN-β [11]. The largest known family of intracellular PRRs, however, comprises the NACHT-LRRs (NLRs). Alternative names for this family include

NLRs and inflammatory disorders

Polymorphisms or mutations in human or mouse NLRs are associated with susceptibility to inflammatory disorders, which further strengthens the idea that these molecules are important in inflammation and immunity. Loss-of-function mutations in CIITA are responsible for type II bare lymphocyte syndrome (BLS), a genetically inherited disorder characterized by MHC II deficiency [25]. Mutations in CIITA directly impair the ability of CIITA to act as a transcriptional activator, resulting in decreased

Signals triggered by NLRs

Little is known on the signaling cascades and effector mechanisms initiated by most of the NLRs. Here, only the signals proposed to be triggered by NOD1, NOD2 and some NALPs are reviewed.

Peptidoglycans as activators of NOD1, NOD2 and NALP3

What are the signals that activate the NLRs? Early studies on the inflammasome revealed that NALP activation can be triggered in vitro by hypotonic stress. This ‘stress’-induced activation process possibly results from the release or activation of a ‘danger signal’ or from the disruption of a guarding complex as proposed for R-gene activation [46]. Other studies using knockout mice showed that ATP-induced activation of caspase-1 is dependent on ASC, suggesting that NALPs are activated on P2X7

Similarity between NOD and NALP activation and the Drosophila Toll pathway

Another interesting parallel between TLRs and NLRs can be drawn if we compare the model proposed for PGN sensing by NODs and NALP3 with typical Toll receptor activation in Drosophila (Figure 4). The Drosophila Toll receptor and mammalian IL-1R do not recognize microbial patterns directly. Both receptors are activated by the endogenous cytokines, Spätzle and IL-1β, respectively, which both require processing and maturation for their activation [52]. Processing of Spätzle and IL-1β is mediated by

Conclusion

The recent characterization of NLRs has revealed interesting overlaps between the signaling pathways used by some NLRs and TLRs, suggesting redundancy and cooperation between these pathways. NLRs thus join TLRs as crucial innate sensors of pathogens. Although some progress has been made in the characterization of some NLRs, this is an emerging field of research with a plethora of open questions. For instance, the function of many NLRs, such as NAIP or many NALPs, is not clearly known. Another

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Michael McDermott and Helen Everett for comments and critical reading of the manuscript and all members of the laboratory, in particular Etienne Meylan, Saskia Lippens and Virginie Petrilli, for helpful discussions and comments.

References (65)

  • M.F. McDermott

    Genetic clues to understanding periodic fevers, and possible therapies

    Trends Mol. Med.

    (2002)
  • L. Agostini

    NALP3 forms an IL-1β-processing inflammasome with increased activity in Muckle-Wells autoinflammatory disorder

    Immunity

    (2004)
  • D.W. Abbott

    The Crohn's disease protein, NOD2, requires RIP2 in order to induce ubiquitinylation of a novel site on NEMO

    Curr. Biol.

    (2004)
  • K.A. Burns et al.

    Inflammatory diseases: is ubiquitinated NEMO at the hub?

    Curr. Biol.

    (2004)
  • E. Meylan et al.

    The RIP kinases: crucial integrators of cellular stress

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (2005)
  • F. Martinon

    The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-β

    Mol. Cell

    (2002)
  • F. Martinon

    Identification of bacterial muramyl dipeptide as activator of the NALP3/cryopyrin inflammasome

    Curr. Biol.

    (2004)
  • S.E. Girardin

    Nod2 is a general sensor of peptidoglycan through muramyl dipeptide (MDP) detection

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • I.G. Boneca

    The role of peptidoglycan in pathogenesis

    Curr. Opin. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • D.A. Jones et al.

    Plant innate immunity – direct and indirect recognition of general and specific pathogen-associated molecules

    Curr. Opin. Immunol.

    (2004)
  • E.A. Van der Biezen et al.

    Plant disease-resistance proteins and the gene-for-gene concept

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1998)
  • D.S. Schneider

    Plant immunity and film Noir: what gumshoe detectives can teach us about plant–pathogen interactions

    Cell

    (2002)
  • D. Mackey

    RIN4 interacts with Pseudomonas syringae type III effector molecules and is required for RPM1-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis

    Cell

    (2002)
  • D. Mackey

    Arabidopsis RIN4 is a target of the type III virulence effector AvrRpt2 and modulates RPS2-mediated resistance

    Cell

    (2003)
  • M.J. Axtell et al.

    Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4

    Cell

    (2003)
  • R. Marathe et al.

    Plant defense: one post, multiple guards?!

    Mol. Cell

    (2003)
  • J. Ellis et al.

    Plant pathology: monitoring a pathogen-targeted host protein

    Curr. Biol.

    (2003)
  • M. Albrecht

    Structural localization of disease-associated sequence variations in the NACHT and LRR domains of PYPAF1 and NOD2

    FEBS Lett.

    (2003)
  • C.A. Janeway et al.

    Innate immune recognition

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (2002)
  • P. Matzinger

    The danger model: a renewed sense of self

    Science

    (2002)
  • Y. Shi

    Molecular identification of a danger signal that alerts the immune system to dying cells

    Nature

    (2003)
  • M.T. Lotze et al.

    High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1): nuclear weapon in the immune arsenal

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text