Hand Hygiene: An Update

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2016.04.007Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Hand hygiene by health care workers is a key factor in preventing health care–associated infections, yet hand hygiene occurs only 40% of the time.

  • Alcohol-based hand rubs offer excellent antimicrobial killing, while facilitating hand hygiene with their ease of use.

  • New technologies offer innovative ways to monitor and improve hand hygiene by health care workers, yet costs and limitations remain.

Human skin and skin flora

Human skin is colonized with bacteria. Counts vary depending on body location; bacterial counts on the hands of health care workers have been reported to range from 3.9 × 104 to 4.6 × 106 colony-forming units (CFUs)/cm2.1 Two classifications of skin flora have been delineated: transient flora and resident flora. Transient flora are those associated most frequently with health care–associated infections and are, therefore, the primary target of hand hygiene within the health care setting.

Evolution of guidelines

Hand hygiene practices in the United States have been shaped by guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The earliest guidelines encouraged the use of plain soap and promoted the use of waterless agents only when sinks were not available.9 In 1995, guidelines were issued by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control.4 Handwashing with plain soap was advised for general patient care and removing visible soil. Hand antisepsis with antimicrobial soap

Alcohol-based hand rubs

The reduction in bacterial counts achieved after application of an alcohol-based hand rub varies depending on the alcohol used; n-propanol is more bactericidal than isopranolol, which is more bactericidal than ethanol.8, 16 Efficacy is also related to concentration of the alcohol, with higher concentrations having greater bactericidal effect (up to 95%). Greater flammability limits the use of the higher concentrations of alcohol. In the United States, alcohol-based hand rubs are typically

Hand hygiene adherence

The commonly cited figure for health care worker hand hygiene adherence is 40%, which is derived from the average adherence reported in 34 studies performed between 1981 and 2000.1 Baseline adherence in those studies ranged from 5% to 81%. Although there have been numerous hand hygiene improvement studies published in early part of the 21st century, as of this writing there has not been a comprehensive review that has provided an update to this 40% adherence figure. The expectations of health

Barriers to hand hygiene

The study of barriers to optimal hand hygiene performance helps to inform interventions intended to improve performance. Barriers and risk factors have been reviewed comprehensively by other authors,35 a few issues will be highlighted here. With multiple demands on their time, the time required for hand hygiene performance is a frequently mentioned barrier to acceptable hand hygiene adherence. As mentioned, one of the benefits of alcohol-based hand rubs is the time savings in their application.

Improving hand hygiene adherence

At its root, the practice of hand hygiene can be considered a behavior to be encouraged among health care workers. The practice of hand hygiene occurs outside of the health care setting as well, and the variance in practices learned in the home and the expectations within the health care setting explains in part the poor performance of health care workers. Under 1 rubric, there are 2 types of hand hygiene behaviors: inherent and elective. Inherent hand hygiene occurs when hands are perceived as

Health care–associated infections

Although improving hand hygiene is frequently cited as an important component of preventing health care–associated infections, the evidence basis for this assertion has yet to be established satisfactorily.73 An updated Cochrane review attempted to synthesize the numerous studies published on the topic, but arrived at no conclusion because only 4 studies were felt adequate for inclusion.74 It is worthwhile to mention a few select examples of studies that have attempted to answer the question in

Summary

Despite the abundance of hand hygiene literature, there remain numerous unanswered questions that should engage future researchers. As an example: what is the optimal level of hand hygiene adherence necessary to improve infectious outcomes? Several modeling studies have explored this issue and seem to reach consensus that there exists a level of adherence beyond which incremental improvements will achieve no further reduction in the transmission of infection, yet it is not clear what the

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (80)

  • B.I. Braun et al.

    Measuring adherence to hand hygiene guidelines: a field survey for examples of effective practices

    Am J Infect Control

    (2009)
  • M.A. Ward et al.

    Automated and electronically assisted hand hygiene monitoring systems: a systematic review

    Am J Infect Control

    (2014)
  • L.L. Pineles et al.

    Accuracy of a radiofrequency identification (RFID) badge system to monitor hand hygiene behavior during routine clinical activities

    Am J Infect Control

    (2014)
  • D. Pittet

    Compliance with hand disinfection and its impact on hospital-acquired infections

    J Hosp Infect

    (2001)
  • F.I. McArdle et al.

    How much time is needed for hand hygiene in intensive care? A prospective trained observer study of rates of contact between healthcare workers and intensive care patients

    J Hosp Infect

    (2006)
  • M. Whitby et al.

    Handwashing in healthcare workers: accessibility of sink location does not improve compliance

    J Hosp Infect

    (2004)
  • P. Heeg

    Does hand care ruin hand disinfection?

    J Hosp Infect

    (2001)
  • S.R. Franca et al.

    The effect of contact precautions on hand hygiene compliance

    Am J Infect Control

    (2013)
  • A. Cusini et al.

    Improved hand hygiene compliance after eliminating mandatory glove use from contact precautions-Is less more?

    Am J Infect Control

    (2015)
  • M. Rome et al.

    Hand hygiene compliance

    J Hosp Infect

    (2007)
  • M. Whitby et al.

    Methodological difficulties in hand hygiene research

    J Hosp Infect

    (2007)
  • E. Girou et al.

    Handwashing compliance in a French university hospital: new perspective with the introduction of hand-rubbing with a waterless alcohol-based solution

    J Hosp Infect

    (2001)
  • D. Pittet et al.

    Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control Programme

    Lancet

    (2000)
  • J. Randle et al.

    Hand hygiene compliance in healthcare workers

    J Hosp Infect

    (2006)
  • M. Whitby et al.

    Three successful interventions in health care workers that improve compliance with hand hygiene: is sustained replication possible?

    Am J Infect Control

    (2008)
  • V. Lent et al.

    Evaluation of patient participation in a patient empowerment initiative to improve hand hygiene practices in a Veterans Affairs medical center

    Am J Infect Control

    (2009)
  • L. Johnson et al.

    A multifactorial action plan improves hand hygiene adherence and significantly reduces central line-associated bloodstream infections

    Am J Infect Control

    (2014)
  • K.A. Sepkowitz

    Why doesn't hand hygiene work better?

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2012)
  • X. Song et al.

    Improving hand hygiene compliance in health care workers: Strategies and impact on patient outcomes

    Am J Infect Control

    (2013)
  • J.M. Boyce et al.

    Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Association for Professionals in Infection Control/Infectious Diseases Society of America

    MMWR Recomm Rep

    (2002)
  • M.L. Rotter

    Semmelweis' sesquicentennial: a little-noted anniversary of handwashing

    Curr Opin Infect Dis

    (1998)
  • E.A. Mortimer et al.

    Transmission of staphylococci between newborns. Importance of the hands to personnel

    Am J Dis Child

    (1962)
  • E. Larson

    Hygiene of the skin: when is clean too clean?

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2001)
  • A.F. Widmer

    Replace hand washing with use of a waterless alcohol hand rub?

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2000)
  • G. Kampf et al.

    Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs

    Clin Microbiol Rev

    (2004)
  • J.S. Garner et al.

    CDC guidelines for the prevention and control of nosocomial infections. Guideline for handwashing and hospital environmental control, 1985. Supersedes guideline for hospital environmental control published in 1981

    Am J Infect Control

    (1986)
  • Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC)

    Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (1995)
  • J.S. Garner

    Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (1996)
  • L. Mody et al.

    Adoption of alcohol-based handrub by United States hospitals: a national survey

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2008)
  • D. Pittet et al.

    The World Health Organization Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care and their consensus recommendations

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2009)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Effect of water or ethanol on the tautomeric stability and proton transfer reaction of all possible tautomers of hydantoin: Implicit v/s explicit solvation

      2022, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hydantoin, having disinfecting properties [6], was thus proposed to be incorporated in alcohol-based sanitisers as it is more common and effective compared to those which are non-alcohol-based [7,8]. Liquid hand soap and hand sanitisers containing hydantoin have been tested to be efficient against harmful microorganisms including the SARS-CoV-2 [9] and they are recommended for proper disinfection [7,10]. Tautomerism occurs when two or more compounds known as tautomers can be interconverted by exchanging a hydrogen atom [11,12].

    • Central venous catheter insertion: Review of recent evidence

      2021, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Efficacy review for different CVCs insertion-related infection prevention measures. Despite the fact that hand hygiene has been demonstrated to significantly reduce nosocomial infections, there is still low adherence among health professionals [14,15]. Active communication between behavior monitoring technology and healthcare workers seems to result in sustained increase in hand hygiene culture [16].

    • Influence of the Internet of Things management system on hand hygiene compliance in an emergency intensive care unit

      2021, Journal of Hospital Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      For this reason, the provision of lotions to reduce dermatitis is recommended. Fortunately, skin care products will not adversely affect the antimicrobial properties of alcohol-based hand rubs [12]. Additionally, cleaning staff may have reduced medical knowledge, and training could be strengthened to improve their hand hygiene compliance.

    • Dendrimer-mediated permeation enhancement of chlorhexidine digluconate: Determination of in vitro skin permeability and visualisation of dermal distribution

      2021, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Prior to drug-dendrimer co-formulation, delivery of CHG from the gel formulation was optimised through the formulation of a series of gels. An ethanol-based gel was chosen as they are fast acting, economical and convenient to use [8,40,41]. In addition, gels apply to the skin smoothly, are aesthetically pleasing, and the ethanol smell is associated with cleanliness.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A version of this article originally appeared in Volume 25, Issue 1 of Infectious Disease Clinics of North America.

    Disclosures: None.

    View full text