Creation of training aids for human remains detection canines utilizing a non-contact, dynamic airflow volatile concentration technique
Introduction
Canines have been used as scent detectors for thousands of years [1]. The earliest detector canines were used to locate prey when hunting with their masters. Their ability to hunt and locate prey comes naturally, as all canines, domesticated and wild, have a natural drive to hunt and a keen ability to detect the particular scent given off by the prey object [2]. The use of scent canines has evolved from merely a hunting tool to a detection device used by many government and law enforcement agencies, as well as private entities. Current uses of scent canines include, but are not limited to, the detection of drugs, explosives, accelerants, humans (living and deceased), agricultural products, currency, melanoma and pests [3].
The specialty of human remains detector (HRD) canines, also known as cadaver dogs or victim recovery dogs, evolved from the search and recovery discipline. Search and rescue canines are trained to locate living humans, often in wilderness or disaster settings. While working with their search and rescue canines, handlers noticed that the canines would lose the scent path if the living person had expired, as the change from living human odor to deceased human odor was unfamiliar to these canines [4]. Based on these observations, a new class of detector dogs, HRD canines, was initiated.
Human remains detector canines are trained to locate human remains, including whole bodies, body parts, tissue, blood, bone and decomposition fluids. Several published studies focused on the capability of human remains detection canines, including the use of canines to locate extremely small or aged scent sources, such as human teeth, scattered remains, old graves, and materials that had indirect contact with remains materials. These studies show that HRD canines are adept at locating minimal quantities of odor, including buried and aged remains. However, the canines’ performances can be affected by training, familiarity with the scent source, and environmental conditions [4], [5], [6], [7].
In real life scenarios, the canine may be asked to search for a range of odors, from fresh bodies, putrefied bodies in the height of odor production, to ancient skeletal remains. The odor source may be a whole body, body parts, tissue or blood. For canines to locate all types and ages of human remains, it is imperative that handlers use an assortment of training aids when possible. Training aids commonly include human bone, gauze that has been soaked in decomposition fluid, blood, adipocere, grave dirt, and articles or clothing previously in contact with remains [6], [8], [9]. These training aids are difficult to obtain due to limited access imposed by legal restrictions and are potential biohazards [7].
Human tissue is considered to be a reliable scent source and can be decomposed to different levels; however, it is particularly difficult to obtain and has the greatest number of legal restrictions [8]. As an alternative to actual human remains, chemical pseudo scents have been used as training aids. Putrescine and cadaverine are particularly odorous compounds formed during the decomposition process and are commonly found in pseudo scent mixtures. While these compounds may be easier to obtain legally, their hazardous nature requires extra precaution during handling. Additionally, cadaverine and putrescine are not human specific as they are known to be found in all decaying organic matter [7] and have also been detected in human saliva [10]. Another drawback of pseudo scent mixtures is that there is a high likelihood that they do not represent the entire odor picture of human remains, as there have been few scientific studies showing that these particular compounds or combinations thereof are the specific odorants required by HRD canines.
A majority of HRD canine handlers in the United States and some in Europe are civilians and not directly associated with any law enforcement or government agency. Even with the many groups associated with canine human remains detection, there are no universally accepted methods for training, and there is currently no centralized organization that has established training and certification guidelines. The Scientific Working Group for Dog and Orthogonal Detector Guidelines (SWGDOG) consists of experts from local, state, federal and international agencies acting to establish best practice guidelines for detector canines, including human remains detection canines, in an attempt to improve their performance and reliability. They emphasize the need for further research in the area of human remains detection because while some research has been published on the topic, it remains minimal and inadequate. The SWGDOG subcommittee on Research and Technology has created a list of research needs for the detection canine community. In their document, SWGDOG considers the need for the development of reliable training aids to be critical, particularly for HRD canines. Improved training aids include those that are easily and legally obtainable, non-hazardous, easy to use, reusable, and representative of the whole odor picture for the canines [11].
The Scent Transfer Unit (STU-100) is a field-portable, dynamic-airflow collection device developed for the concentration of living human scent volatiles from scent samples onto a sorbent material. It consists of a small vacuum pump attached to a Teflon-coated hood designed to hold a piece of collection material. When the STU-100 is swept over the subject or object of interest, air is drawn toward the device, concentrating any volatile organic compounds (VOCs) present onto the sorbent material at the face. Following collection, the gauze pad is removed and may be presented to the canine in order to initiate a search. It is currently employed by many law enforcement and federal agencies in the United States as a method of scent collection for use with human scent canines.
Harvey and Harvey [12] demonstrated the ability of human scent detection canines to accurately trail individual humans through different environments based on the scent that was collected onto a gauze pad using the STU-100. Eight bloodhounds were run on five different trails, all between 0.5 and 1.5 miles with a “Y” shaped pattern, requiring the canine to make a decision between turning left or right. The trails were aged for 24 h prior to introduction to the canines. The trailing environments included a local park, a college campus and a downtown, urban area, all with a high amount of foot traffic making trail contamination probable. The study showed that 77.5% of all canines successfully completed the trials, demonstrating the ability of trained canines to discriminate and follow individual people based on scent collected by the STU-100.
It was further demonstrated by researchers and dog handlers at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Southern California Bloodhound Coalition that the STU-100 was capable of collecting human scent from post-blast debris: A bomb was detonated and scent pads were collected from the post-blast debris using the STU-100. The scent pads were presented to twelve canine teams, which were asked to trail to the person who had handled the bomb before detonation. Of the twelve canines, 78.3% trailed to the correct person with no false positives [13].
Curran et al. [14] conducted a similar study using the STU-100 to collect human scent from post-blast debris of a roadside bomb consisting of 60 mm mortars boosted with C-4 and a peroxide bomb composed with liquid peroxide and liquid nitromethane, separately detonated. The explosive devices were handled by a human subject, detonated, and the debris was recovered. The scent evidence was collected from the debris with the STU-100, and the gauze pads were presented to canine teams. Overall, an average success from site response of 82.2% and a combined overall average success of 73.5% was reported. These studies demonstrated that trained canines can accurately trail and identify the correct subject from evidence collected with the STU-100, even under unusual or extreme situations.
As the HRD canines utilize VOCs emanating from the source of interest in the detection process, the approach employed here was to create canine training aids by the pre-concentration of VOCs emanating from human remains on a suitable sorbent. The objective of the current study is to explore the effectiveness of a non-contact, dynamic airflow sampling device that can efficiently pre-concentrate human remains VOCs onto a sorbent material from the sample matrix. To the best of our knowledge, this article represents the first research study to apply scent collection by the Scent Transfer Unit (STU-100) to the creation of canine training aids. These new generation training aids are non-hazardous, easy to obtain, and represents a comprehensive odor picture for a variety of human remains odors. Such training materials were tested with HRD canines to demonstrate the efficacy of the new training aids.
Section snippets
Creation of training aids
Canine training aids were made by collecting target odors with the STU-100 onto Dukal cotton gauze (DUKAL Corporation, Syosset, NY). For VOC collection from scent sources, the STU-100 was run for 1 min, one to four inches above the sample, on the lowest flow rate setting, as had previously been determined to be the optimal setting for odor concentration prior to sampling, the sorbent material was analytically cleaned using a previously developed cleaning protocol [15]. Scent sources included
Trial 1: preliminary trials
Day 1: The training aids included odors that were collected with the STU-100 and were from two different fresh human remains, canine remains, and cremated human remains. Three positive controls and a STU blank were also placed in the blocks. The canines’ responses to each block are given in Table 7.
The total number of false positives were determined by the total possible number of alerts (total number of alerts = total number of blocks × number of canines) subtracted from the number of possible
Conclusions
The human remains detection canine community is in need of improved training aids that are easily and legally obtainable, non-hazardous, reusable, and representative of the entire odor picture of human remains. The training aids in this study were created in an attempt to fulfill the requirements currently demanded by HRD canine handler community using the STU-100 for the collection of human remains odor onto a gauze pad. The gauze pad containing the odor of interest was removed from the
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Abuzar Kabir for his contributions to the preparation of this manuscript. The authors would also like to thank Borden Cremation Services for offering access to their resources for this research and all of the participating canine handlers and agencies.
References (15)
- et al.
The scientific foundation and efficacy of the use of canines as chemical detectors for explosives
Talanta
(2001) - et al.
Time profile of putrescine, cadaverine, indole, and skatole in human saliva
Arch Oral. Biol.
(2003) - et al.
Canine human scent identifications with post-blast debris collected from improvised explosive devices
Forensic Sci. Int.
(2010) - et al.
Evaluation of selected sorbent materials for the collection of volatile organic compounds related to human scent using non-contact sampling mode
Forensic Sci. Int.
(2011) Guide to Search and Rescue Dogs
(2004)- et al.
Laboratory and field experiments used to identify Canis lupus var. familiaris active odor signature chemicals from drugs, explosives, and humans
Anal. Bioanal. Chem.
(2003) Is forensic science going to the dogs?
Forensic Magazine
(2008)
Cited by (36)
Headspace sampling of smokeless powder odor in a dynamic airflow context
2022, Forensic ChemistryUse of GC×GC for the characterization of odours in forensic applications
2022, Comprehensive Analytical ChemistryProfiling the scent of weathered training aids for blood-detection dogs
2018, Science and JusticeCitation Excerpt :Cadaver-detection canines are primarily used to locate human remains, with some also trained to detect blood and other tissue samples. Blood-detection canines are a specialised group of cadaver-detection dogs, trained and employed to detect odours associated with human blood at both indoor and outdoor crime scenes [4,9]. At present, the main training aid used in the development of blood-detection dogs is fresh human blood deposited on bandages, soil or directly in tin cans [12].