Review
Systematic review of irreversible electroporation in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.08.480Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel procedure to combat pancreatic cancer, whereby high voltage pulses are delivered, resulting in cell death. This represents an ideal alternative to other thermal treatment modalities, as there is no overriding heat effect, therefore reducing the risk of injury to vessels and ducts.

Methods

Multiple databases were searched to January 2014. Primary outcome measures were survival and associated morbidity. 41 articles were initially identified; of these 4 studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding 74 patients in total.

Results

94.5% of patients had locally advanced tumours, the remainder had metastatic disease. Treated tumour size ranged from 1 to 7 cm. IRE approach included open (70.3%), laparoscopic (2.7%) and percutaneous (27%; ultrasound-guided 30%, CT-guided 70%) Morbidity ranged from 0 to 33%; due to the high number of simultaneous procedures performed (resection/bypass) it was difficult to ascertain IRE-related complications. However no significant bleeding occurred when IRE-alone was performed. Survival statistics suggest a prognostic benefit. Reported survival included: 6 month survival of 40% (n = 5) and 70% (n = 14); PFS and OS 14 and 20 months respectively (n = 54). Results of most interest showed a significant survival benefit in matched IRE vs non-IRE groups (PFS 14 vs 6 mths; p = 0.01, OS 20 vs 11 mths; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

Initial evidence suggests IRE incurs a prognostic benefit with minimal morbidity. More high quality research is required to determine the role IRE may play in the multi-modal management of pancreatic cancers.

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat due to its late presentation, aggressive nature and resistance to most currently available treatments. As a result prognosis is dismal, with 1 and 5 year survival rates being 18% and 3.5% respectively. It represents the fifth most common cause of cancer death in the UK, with approximately 8000 cases per year.1 The location of the pancreas means patients are often asymptomatic until the disease presents at an advanced stage, at which point curative resection is not possible due to either distant metastases or involvement of local vascular structures, such as the portal vein, coeliac trunk and superior mesenteric vessels.2 At presentation only 20% of patients are suitable for surgery.3

In the palliative setting combination chemotherapy regimens have been developed to improve survival. This includes the FOLFIRINOX/gemcitabine combination which demonstrated marginally improved survival,4 and more recently the promising phase 3 study of Abraxane (nab-pcalitaxel) plus gemcitabine demonstrating significantly improved OS, PFS and response rate.5 Patients can also receive adjuvant chemotherapy post-resection to combat the risk of recurrence. However despite many well-designed RCT's describing aggressive chemotherapy (ESPAC)6 and/or radiotherapy7 combined with surgical resection, survival rates have remained relatively unchanged with postoperative 5 year survival of 10–20%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable locally advanced tumours also has a role, with evidence suggesting this can offer the potential for cure by inducing resectability in 30–40%.8

An alternative method of providing symptomatic relief, survival benefit, and potentially downsizing tumours to facilitate resection involves a number of ablative techniques. This includes radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA). These modalities demonstrate promising results, however due to the highly vascular nature of the pancreas, inadvertent thermal injury to adjacent vessels can result in significant bleeding. Furthermore thermal injury to the pancreatic and bile duct can result in fistulae or bile leaks respectively.

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a relatively novel procedure which represents a potentially ideal solution for the ablative treatment of pancreatic tumours as no thermal tissue damage occurs, thus avoiding vessel or duct injury.9 This technique involves the delivery of a high voltage current through electrodes placed into the tumour, either under radiological guidance, via laparoscopy or by an open surgical approach. This method results in the creation of pores in the phospholipid bilayer, and the cell membrane damage disrupts intra-cellular homeostasis, ultimately causing apoptotic cell death, whilst sparing surrounding structures such as vessels, ducts (biliary and pancreatic) and connective tissue.9, 10, 11 This review concentrates on current evidence regarding the clinical applicability of IRE in the management of pancreatic tumours, examining efficacy, safety and survival.

Section snippets

Search strategy

Multiple databases were searched up to January 27th 2014, including Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane library and Google Scholar. Search terms based on MeSH key words included pancreatic cancer/carcinoma/neoplasm and irreversible electroporation. The literature was searched and data extracted independently by the first author (JM), and any inconsistencies discussed with a second author (SW).

Criteria for inclusion/exclusion

Studies included were any retrospective or prospective case series or reports. The main aim of this

Results

The search strategy initially yielded 33 citations. After review of titles and abstracts 27 studies were excluded with reasons as documented in Fig. 1. Two studies were excluded after full text review, leaving a total of 4 included studies.

Discussion

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most difficult malignancies to manage and survival remains poor due to late presentation with either locally advanced or metastatic disease. Typical management currently consists of chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, in an attempt to reduce tumour growth and dissemination, and control symptoms such as pain from neural invasion.

A multi-modal approach to treatment offers the greatest promise for improved outcomes, and the use of localised targeted

Conclusion

Initial evidence suggests IRE has a role in the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer, with studies thus far suggesting a potential survival benefit, symptomatic improvement with limited morbidity, and a potential role as a bridge to surgery. Further studies are still required to determine if any significant survival benefit is achieved and to further define its place in the armamentarium of treatments against pancreatic cancer. Various questions are still to be answered, such as

Conflict of interest statement

All authors confirm there is no financial or personal conflict of interest with regards to this article.

References (39)

  • J.C. Weaver et al.

    Theory of skin electroporation: implications of straight-through aqueous pathway segments that connect adjacent corneocytes

    J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc

    (1998)
  • L.M. Mir

    Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilization

    Bioelectrochemistry

    (2001)
  • S. Orlowski et al.

    Cell electropermeabilization: a new tool for biochemical and pharmacological studies

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1993)
  • P.J. Kneuertz et al.

    Palliative surgical management of patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: trends and lessons learned from a large, single institution experience

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2011)
  • J.E. Tepper et al.

    Intraoperative radiation therapy of pancreatic carcinoma: a report of RTOG-8505. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1991)
  • R.G. Martin

    Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2013)
  • Cancer Research UK (CRUK)

    Pancreatic cancer statistics

    (2014)
  • M.P. Callery et al.

    Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2009)
  • A.L. Warshaw et al.

    Pancreatic carcinoma

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text