Elsevier

Behavior Therapy

Volume 43, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages 741-756
Behavior Therapy

The Impact of Treatment Components Suggested by the Psychological Flexibility Model: A Meta-Analysis of Laboratory-Based Component Studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2012.05.003Get rights and content

Abstract

An important aspect of psychotherapy research is the examination of the theoretical models underlying intervention approaches. Laboratory-based component research is one useful methodology for this endeavor as it provides an experimental means of testing questions related to intervention components and the change process they engage with a high level of control and precision. A meta-analysis was conducted of 66 laboratory-based component studies evaluating treatment elements and processes that are suggested by the psychological flexibility model that underlies Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (acceptance, defusion, self as context, committed action, values, and present moment), but also touches on a variety of contextual forms of cognitive behavior therapy. Significant positive effect sizes were observed for acceptance, defusion, present moment, values, mixed mindfulness components, and values plus mindfulness component conditions compared to inactive comparison conditions. Additional analyses provided further support for the psychological flexibility model, finding larger effect sizes for theoretically specified outcomes, expected differences between theoretically distinct interventions, and larger effect sizes for component conditions that included experiential methods (e.g., metaphors, exercises) than those with a rationale alone. Effect sizes did not differ between at-risk/distressed and convenience samples. Limitations with the meta-analysis and future directions for laboratory-based component research are discussed.

Highlights

► Meta-analysis of lab-based component studies related to psychological flexibility. ► Significant positive effect size for each component compared to inactive conditions. ► Larger effect size for theoretically specified outcomes. ► Significant positive effect sizes relative to theoretically distinct interventions. ► Larger effect size for conditions with experiential methods than rationale-alone.

Section snippets

Eligibility criteria

The current meta-analysis included English-language published, peer-reviewed laboratory-based studies testing single-session component conditions targeting a subset of psychological flexibility components (acceptance, defusion, present moment, self as context, values, committed action) as compared to alternative conditions to which participants were randomly assigned (e.g., distraction, attention control condition). Studies had to include at least one outcome of possible applied or theoretical

Are psychological flexibility components psychologically active?

At the most basic level, it seems important to determine whether psychological flexibility components generally affect outcome variables in laboratory-based component studies, whether or not these outcomes are targeted theoretically. In order to assess whether components were psychologically active (i.e., have any effect on psychological outcomes), their impact on all outcomes was examined relative to inactive comparison conditions. Effect sizes were calculated for each psychological

Discussion

In broad terms, the present meta-analysis of laboratory-based component studies provides support for the usefulness and theoretical coherence of components specified by the psychological flexibility model. Significant positive effect sizes were observed for acceptance, defusion, present moment, values, mixed mindfulness, and values plus mindfulness conditions compared to inactive conditions, suggesting these components of psychological flexibility are psychologically active. Larger effect sizes

References (0)

Cited by (313)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text