Elsevier

The Lancet Neurology

Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2008, Pages 939-950
The Lancet Neurology

Review
Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70215-1Get rights and content

Summary

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an important cause of acute neuromuscular paralysis. Molecular mimicry and a cross-reactive immune response play a crucial part in its pathogenesis, at least in those cases with a preceding Campylobacter jejuni infection and with antibodies to gangliosides. The type of preceding infection and patient-related host factors seem to determine the form and severity of the disease. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange are effective treatments in GBS; mainly for practical reasons, IVIg is the preferred treatment. Whether mildly affected patients or patients with Miller Fisher syndrome also benefit from IVIg is unclear. Despite medical treatment, GBS often remains a severe disease; 3–10% of patients die and 20% are still unable to walk after 6 months. In addition, many patients have pain and fatigue that can persist for months or years. Advances in prognostic modelling have resulted in the development of a new and simple prognostic outcome scale that might also help to guide new treatment options, particularly in patients with GBS who have a poor prognosis.

Introduction

Almost a century ago, the French neurologists Guillain, Barré, and Strohl described two soldiers who developed acute paralysis with areflexia that spontaneously recovered.1 They reported the combination of increased protein concentration with a normal cell count in the CSF, or albuminocytological dissociation, which differentiated the condition from poliomyelitis.1 Despite the fact that Landry had already reported similar cases in 1859,2 the combination of these clinical and laboratory features became known as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Until now, GBS has remained a descriptive diagnosis of a disorder for which there are no specific diagnostic tests. The combination of rapidly progressive symmetrical weakness in the arms and legs with or without sensory disturbances, hypoflexia or areflexia, in the absence of a CSF cellular reaction, remains the hallmark for the clinical diagnosis of GBS. Over the past 20 years, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the efficacy of plasma exchange (PE) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), and some factors—in particular, Campylobacter jejuni, but also other preceding infections that induce antiganglioside antibodies—have been found to be important in the pathogenesis of GBS. We focus on the diagnosis and the expanding clinical spectrum of GBS, the frequent occurrence of pain and autonomic dysfunction, and recent insights into the pathogenesis of the syndrome. In addition, we discuss prognostic modelling and the current treatment options available during the course of GBS. The Review aims to integrate the latest laboratory and clinical developments that could lead to better therapeutic options for patients with GBS.

Section snippets

Epidemiology

GBS is a common cause of neuromuscular paralysis, and has been reported worldwide. The annual incidence of GBS is reported to be 1·2–2·3 per 100 000.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Most studies have found that the incidence increases linearly with age and that men are about 1·5 times more likely to be affected than women.4, 5, 7 A recent epidemiological report from the USA indicated that the incidence of GBS among patients aged 18 years or older did not change over the period from 2000 to 2004.6 Reports on

Diagnosis

GBS is most commonly a post-infectious disorder that usually occurs in otherwise healthy people, and is not typically associated with an autoimmune or other systemic disorder. In typical cases, among the first symptoms are pain, numbness, paraesthesia, or weakness in the limbs. The main features of GBS are rapidly progressive bilateral and relatively symmetric weakness of the limbs with or without involvement of respiratory muscles or cranial-nerve-innervated muscles.12, 13 Diagnostic criteria

Antecedent infections

About two-thirds of patients have symptoms of an infection in the 3 weeks before the onset of weakness. One Japanese study found that the most frequent antecedent symptoms in GBS and related disorders were fever (52%), cough (48%), sore throat (39%), nasal discharge (30%), and diarrhoea (27%).19 In most GBS studies, symptoms of a preceding infection in the upper respiratory tract or gastrointestinal tract predominate, although many other types of infections have been reported. Furthermore, an

Immunobiology

Studies in patients and animals have provided convincing evidence that GBS, at least in some cases, is caused by an infection-induced aberrant immune response that damages peripheral nerves.31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 Four key factors have been identified that control this process (figure 2).

Clinical spectrum

The extent and distribution of weakness, sensory involvement, and the neurophysiological characteristics vary tremendously between individuals with GBS. The most common subtype of GBS in Europe and North America is the sensory-motor form, AIDP.4 In Europe and North America, fewer than 5–10% of patients have one of the axonal subtypes—AMAN or acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy.4, 17, 85, 86 Facial nerve palsy is the most common form of cranial nerve involvement in GBS, occurring in at

Natural history

Rapidly progressive weakness is the core clinical feature of GBS. By definition, maximum weakness is reached within 4 weeks, but most patients have already reached their maximum weakness within 2 weeks.12, 13 Patients then have a plateau phase of varying duration, which ranges from days to several weeks or months. This phase is followed by a usually much slower recovery phase of varying duration. In Europe, about a third of patients with GBS remain able to walk (mildly affected patients).5, 89,

General care

Patients with GBS are in particular need of excellent multidisciplinary care to prevent and manage potentially fatal complications (panel 3).98 Thus, patients need careful and regular monitoring of pulmonary function (at least vital capacity and respiration frequency) and possible autonomic dysfunction (heart beat frequency, blood pressure), and infections need to be prevented.99 Among other issues that need attention early in the course of disease are prophylaxis for deep-vein thrombosis,

Beneficial effects of immunotherapy

The first large trial to show a positive effect of immunotherapy on GBS was the North American PE study.100 This positive effect was confirmed by a large French PE trial.101, 102 PE was beneficial when applied within the first 4 weeks of onset, but the largest effect was seen when started early (within the first 2 weeks).100, 103 The usual regimen is PE five times during 2 weeks, with a total exchange of about five plasma volumes. The first RCT on the use of IVIg was published in 1992, and

Pain in the acute and chronic phases

Pain is a common and severe symptom in patients with GBS. Recognition of pain is important, especially in patients who are unable to communicate due to intubation. Pain as a presenting symptom before the onset of weakness might be confusing and can cause a delay in making a diagnosis of GBS. Pain has been described in up to 89% of patients with GBS.134, 135, 136 Different symptoms of pain associated with GBS have been distinguished during different phases of disease: paraesthesia or

Prognosis

The prognosis of GBS is difficult to predict in individual patients because of the substantial variation in outcome. Advanced age, however, is generally reported to be indicative of a worse prognosis. The severity of GBS seems to be determined in the early phase of the disease.122 RCTs that have investigated the effect of IVIg or PE in patients who were unable to walk have concluded that about 20% of patients remained unable to walk unaided after 6 months.91 Neurophysiological testing is

Future directions

New treatment options in GBS are necessary because the prognosis in a large proportion of patients with GBS is still far from good. One option in the acute phase could be a second course of IVIg treatment in patients with a bad prognosis. Recent studies indicate that agents that interfere with complement activation are potentially attractive candidates to be tested in the very early phase of GBS.74, 75 When it is possible to predict outcome in individual patients more accurately, new drugs or

Search strategy and selection criteria

References for this Review were identified by searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January, 1985, to June, 2008, by use of the terms “Guillain-Barré syndrome”, “acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy”, “AMAN”, “Miller Fisher syndrome”, and “Fisher syndrome”. Articles resulting from that search and relevant references cited in those articles were considered. The articles were chosen if they focused on the latest advances in the field. Articles were also

References (158)

  • N Yuki

    Infectious origins of, and molecular mimicry in, Guillain-Barré and Fisher syndromes

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2001)
  • N Yuki et al.

    Acute motor axonal neuropathy and acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy share a common immunological profile

    J Neurol Sci

    (1999)
  • M Gilbert et al.

    Biosynthesis of ganglioside mimics in Campylobacter jejuni OH4384. Identification of the glycosyltransferase genes, enzymatic synthesis of model compounds, and characterization of nanomole amounts by 600-MHz 1H and 13C NMR analysis

    J Biol Chem

    (2000)
  • BC Jacobs et al.

    Subclass IgG to motor gangliosides related to infection and clinical course in Guillain-Barré syndrome

    J Neuroimmunol

    (2008)
  • CW Ang et al.

    A case of Guillain-Barré syndrome following a family outbreak of Campylobacter jejuni enteritis

    J Neuroimmunol

    (2000)
  • K Geleijns et al.

    Functional polymorphisms in LPS receptors CD14 and TLR4 are not associated with disease susceptibility or Campylobacter jejuni infection in Guillain-Barré patients

    J Neuroimmunol

    (2004)
  • K Geleijns et al.

    Fas polymorphisms are associated with the presence of anti-ganglioside antibodies in Guillain-Barre syndrome

    J Neuroimmunol

    (2005)
  • K Geleijns et al.

    Genetic polymorphisms of macrophage-mediators in Guillain-Barré syndrome

    J Neuroimmunol

    (2007)
  • NM van Sorge et al.

    Severity of Guillain-Barré syndrome is associated with Fc gamma receptor III polymorphisms

    J Neuroimmunol

    (2005)
  • HJ Willison et al.

    The immunopathogenesis of Miller Fisher syndrome

    J Neuroimmunol

    (1999)
  • RA Bernsen et al.

    Long-term impact on work and private life after Guillain-Barré syndrome

    J Neurol Sci

    (2002)
  • RA Hughes et al.

    Controlled trial prednisolone in acute polyneuropathy

    Lancet

    (1978)
  • G Guillain et al.

    Sur un syndrome de radiculo-nevrite avec hyperalbuminose du liquide cephalorachidien sans reaction cellulaire. Remarques sur les caracteres cliniques et graphiques des reflexes tendineux

    Bull Soc Med Hop Paris

    (1916)
  • O Landry

    Note sur la paralysie ascendante aigue

    Gazette Hebdomadaire Méd Chir

    (1859)
  • R van Koningsveld et al.

    Mild forms of Guillain-Barré syndrome in an epidemiologic survey in The Netherlands

    Neurology

    (2000)
  • A Alshekhlee et al.

    Guillain-Barré syndrome: incidence and mortality rates in US hospitals

    Neurology

    (2008)
  • G Bogliun et al.

    Incidence and clinical features of acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy in Lombardy, Italy, 1996

    Acta Neurol Scand

    (2004)
  • LJ Hauck et al.

    Incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome in Alberta, Canada: an administrative data study

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • HC Lehmann et al.

    Incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome in Germany

    J Peripher Nerv Syst

    (2007)
  • TW Ho et al.

    Guillain-Barré syndrome in northern China. Relationship to Campylobacter jejuni infection and anti-glycolipid antibodies

    Brain

    (1995)
  • R van Koningsveld et al.

    Gastroenteritis-associated Guillain-Barré syndrome on the Caribbean island Curacao

    Neurology

    (2001)
  • AK Asbury et al.

    Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barré syndrome

    Ann Neurol

    (1990)
  • FG van der Meché et al.

    Diagnostic and classification criteria for the Guillain-Barré syndrome

    Eur Neurol

    (2001)
  • FG van der Meché et al.

    Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: immune mechanisms and update on current therapies

    Ann Neurol

    (1995)
  • YR Yang et al.

    Comparative proteomics analysis of cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome

    Cell Mol Neurobiol

    (2008)
  • TW Ho et al.

    Patterns of recovery in the Guillain-Barré syndromes

    Neurology

    (1997)
  • T Nowe et al.

    Paralytic ileus as a presenting symptom of Guillain-Barré syndrome

    J Neurol

    (2008)
  • M Koga et al.

    Antecedent symptoms in Guillain-Barré syndrome: an important indicator for clinical and serological subgroups

    Acta Neurol Scand

    (2001)
  • RD Hadden et al.

    Preceding infections, immune factors, and outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome

    Neurology

    (2001)
  • BC Jacobs et al.

    The spectrum of antecedent infections in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a case-control study

    Neurology

    (1998)
  • Guillain-Barré syndrome: an Italian multicentre case-control study

    Neurol Sci

    (2000)
  • P Haber et al.

    Guillain-Barré syndrome following influenza vaccination

    JAMA

    (2004)
  • R Hughes et al.

    Vaccines and Guillain-Barré syndrome

    BMJ

    (1996)
  • T Lasky et al.

    The Guillain-Barré syndrome and the 1992–1993 and 1993–1994 influenza vaccines

    N Engl J Med

    (1998)
  • J Tuttle et al.

    The risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome after tetanus-toxoid-containing vaccines in adults and children in the United States

    Am J Public Health

    (1997)
  • LB Schonberger et al.

    Guillain-Barré syndrome following vaccination in the National Influenza Immunization Program, United States, 1976–1977

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1979)
  • J Pritchard et al.

    Risk of relapse of Guillain-Barré syndrome or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy following immunisation

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • CW Ang et al.

    Guillain-Barré syndrome- and Miller Fisher syndrome-associated Campylobacter jejuni lipopolysaccharides induce anti-GM1 and anti-GQ1b antibodies in rabbits

    Infect Immun

    (2001)
  • JW Griffin et al.

    Pathology of the motor-sensory axonal Guillain-Barré syndrome

    Ann Neurol

    (1996)
  • SK Halstead et al.

    Anti-disialoside antibodies kill perisynaptic Schwann cells and damage motor nerve terminals via membrane attack complex in a murine model of neuropathy

    Brain

    (2004)
  • Cited by (627)

    • High risk and low prevalence diseases: Guillain-Barré syndrome

      2024, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text