A model of the development of a periphyton community: resource and flow dynamics
Introduction
Studies of stream ecosystems have focused on periphyton communities, because benthic algae usually dominate planktonic communities. Many experimental studies have concentrated on the dynamics of the essential resources for periphyton growth. Although several studies have been made on the photosynthesis–irradiance relationship (Sand-Jensen and Revsbech, 1987, Boston and Hill, 1991, Dodds, 1991, Graham et al., 1995, Hill, 1996), only a few studies have evaluated the relation between light inside a matrix and the algal response.
The relation between periphyton and nutrients has been intensively studied. Borchardt (1994) found different optimum N:P ratios for Spirogyra fluviatilis at different velocities. Newbold et al., 1981, Newbold et al., 1983 examined the horizontal heterogeneities of nutrients due to a spiraling process using both models and experiments. In natural streams, the saturation concentration of nutrients on a periphyton community seems to depend strongly on the density of the community (Bothwell, 1985, Bothwell, 1988, Bothwell, 1989).
Several models have been devised to clarify the relations among the periphyton community, nutrient concentration in the overflowing water, and the nutrient availability for periphyton growth (Kim et al., 1992, Mulholland et al., 1994, DeAngelis et al., 1995). The vertical variation of oxygen produced in photosynthesis (Carlton and Wetzel, 1987, Sand-Jensen and Revsbech, 1987, Carlton and Wetzel, 1988, Bott et al., 1997) implies a vertically varying concentration of nutrient resources for periphyton growth, indicating the possibility of a nutrient-limited condition for periphyton communities (Horner et al., 1990, Dodds, 1991, Borchardt, 1996). However, the vertical variation of the resources for periphyton growth, such as light and nutrients, has not been quantitatively examined by either models or experiments.
As a number of problems have been pointed out in experiments, such as altering the community structure and producing higher uptake rates by removing the community from the surface in the experiment (Kim et al., 1992), in this study we used models to: (1) simulate the process of periphyton development under the effects of essential resources such as nutrients and light; and (2) in turn, model the resources and water flow in the development of the periphyton community.
Section snippets
Model description
All processes are given in the appendix to compute the thickness of the periphyton mat, light resource, growth, settlement and detachment of periphyton (Asaeda and Son, 2000). Table 1 lists the symbols.
An important concept underpinning algal resource kinetics is the single resource limitation (Hamilton and Schladow, 1997), or the growth of a species being limited by only one resource at a time, ‘Liebig's law of the minimum’. Thus, the resource index, which is defined as the indicator of the
Numerical procedure
A system of differential equations was solved numerically by coding in FORTRAN90, including 23 subroutines of ∼2300 command lines. Additional graphic subroutines authorized by Microsoft corporation permitted the main program to simultaneously show the results. The model was also programmed with highly flexible running options. For accuracy, the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method was initially used to solve a system of the first-order differential equations. To increase the computational stability
Verification and discussion
In the verification, the major nutrients of concern were nitrogen, and phosphorous because they are essential for aquatic organism. Other nutrients, such as carbon and silicon, were assumed to be sufficient for periphyton growth. Boundary values of the phosphorous and nitrogen concentrations (e.g. EN0 in Eq. (9)) were tentatively assigned at 2 and 15 μg l−1, respectively. The water depth, depth-average water velocity, and the light intensity at the water surface were assumed to be constant as 6
Application
Observations made at a stream facility at the University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA (Peterson and Stevenson, 1990, Peterson and Stevenson, 1992) were used to validate the model. To provide a water velocity of 0.29 and 0.12 m s−1, water depths of 2.5 and 6.0 cm, respectively, were used. Despite fluctuations were expected in the experiments, phosphorous and nitrogen concentrations were kept constant at the entrance of the channels throughout the simulation at 2.0 and 15.0 μg l−1, respectively,
Concluding remarks
This study numerically indicated the importance of the diffusion process in nutrient exchange between the periphyton community and overflowing water. The model showed reasonable behavior of periphyton communities, such as light reduction in the periphyton mat, variation of the internal nutrient concentration, and the transition process of a vertical velocity profile.
As several effects were minimized in this study, such as the respiration effect on the cell cytoplasm volume, nutrient releases
Acknowledgements
The study was made while the second author, Duong Hong Son, was receiving a scholarship from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports. This study was financially supported by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports, Foundation of River and Watershed Management, and the Maeda Engineering Foundation. These supports are gratefully acknowledged. We also acknowledge V.T. Ca for his valuable comments on the flow dynamics part of the study.
References (34)
- et al.
Modelling the effects of macrophytes on algal blooming in eutrophic shallow lakes
Ecol. Modelling
(1997) - et al.
Spatial structure and populations of a periphyton community: a model and verification
Ecol. Modelling
(2000) - et al.
Modelling nutrient-periphyton dynamics in streams: the importance of transient storage zones
Ecol. Modelling
(1995) - et al.
Prediction of water quality in lakes and reservoirs. Part I — Model description
Ecol. Modelling
(1997) Response of benthic algal communities to natural physical disturbance
Effects of flowing water on nitrogen- and phosphorus-limited photosynthesis and optimum N:P ratios by Spirogyra fluviatilis (Charophyceae)
J. Phycol.
(1994)- Borchardt, M.A., 1996. Nutrients. In: Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.L., Lowe, R.L. (Eds.), Algal Ecology–Freshwater...
- et al.
Phosphorous uptake kinetics of Spirogyra fluviatis (Charophyceae) in flowing water
J. Phycol.
(1994) - et al.
Photosynthesis-light relations of stream periphyton communities
Limnol. Oceanogr.
(1991) Phosphorus limitation of lotic periphyton growth rates: an intersite comparison using continuous-flow troughs (Thompson River system, British Columbia)
Limnol. Oceanogr.
(1985)
Growth rate responses of lotic periphytic diatoms to experimental phosphorus enrichment: the influence of temperature and light
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
Phosphorus-limited growth dynamics of lotic periphytic diatom communities: areal biomass and cellular growth rate responses
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
An evaluation of techniques for measuring periphyton metabolism in chambers
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
Distributions and fates of oxygen in periphyton communities
Can. J. Bot.
Phosphorous flux from lake sediments: Effect of epipelic algal oxygen production
Limnol. Oceanogr.
Micro-environmental characteristics of filamentous algal communities in flowing freshwaters
Freshwat. Biol.
The ecology of Cladophora
J. Phycol.
Cited by (24)
Periphyton removal flows determined by sediment entrainment thresholds
2020, Ecological ModellingCitation Excerpt :Periphyton detachment has also been mechanistically modelled as a function of flow and biomass (Uehlinger et al. 1996; Labiod et al. 2007). More complicated mechanistic models involve periphyton- and attachment-specific resistance to drag forces (Asaeda and Son 2001; Hondzo and Wang 2002; Tsujimoto and Tashiro 2004). The interaction between flow and sediment and the role of entrained sediment in mediating periphyton biomass has been recognized (Clausen and Biggs 1997; Biggs et al. 1999; Myers et al. 2007) and statistically modelled (Luce et al. 2010), but has not yet been fully elucidated.
Interaction between local hydrodynamics and algal community in epilithic biofilm
2013, Water ResearchCitation Excerpt :To some extent, this use of mean bulk velocities partially explains the poor knowledge about the dynamics, structure and species composition of benthic algal assemblages. Also, it is important to have more knowledge of what is happening in the near-bed flow for the improvement of biomass dynamics models for epilithic biofilms (e.g., McIntire, 1973; Horner and Welch, 1981; Horner et al., 1983; Momo, 1995; Uehlinger et al., 1996; Saravia et al., 1998; Asaeda and Hong Son, 2000, 2001; Flipo et al., 2004; Boulêtreau et al., 2006, 2008) that almost use global descriptors of the hydrodynamics such as integrated flow discharge or velocity. This study was conducted with two main objectives: i) to determine the specific requirements of various algal species with the near-substratum hydrodynamic regime in flows representative of the in situ conditions (growth on large substrates and hydraulically rough turbulent boundary layers), and ii) to test the detachment resistance of algal assemblages to drag and shear stress caused by sudden increases in water velocities.
Modelling periphyton in irrigation canals
2010, Ecological ModellingCitation Excerpt :Either all the biomass or a part of it is removed only when this critical value is reached. Asaeda and Son (2000, 2001) also identified thresholds on the hydrodynamic conditions studying the elementary processes at the local scale of several layers of algae. They consider each filamentous and non-filamentous algae species separately.
The relationship between stream periphyton dynamics and near-bed turbulence in rough open-channel flow
2007, Ecological ModellingCitation Excerpt :It is also important to underline that shear stress, directly linked to the hydraulic conditions, and mainly to the current velocity, has been identified as a key physical factor to explain colonization and periphyton biomass accumulation or loss: Uehlinger et al. (1996), Saravia et al. (1998) and Godillot et al. (2001). Yet, it is interesting to observe that simulation models of periphyton dynamics, in laboratory streams or natural rivers utilize water velocity or discharge to control main processes and particularly loss process (Horner et al., 1983; Rodriguez, 1987; Uehlinger et al., 1996; Saravia et al., 1998; Asaeda and Son, 2001). However, differences between model predictions and field or laboratory data are often very important and mainly during the final stage of accrual when we observe large fluctuations of biomass.
Integrating periphyton and surface water–groundwater methods to understand lake ecosystem processes
2022, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods