Elsevier

Tribology International

Volume 36, Issue 11, November 2003, Pages 781-789
Tribology International

The Stribeck memorial lecture

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(03)00094-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Stribeck’s publications ‘Kugellager für beliebige Belastungen’ and ‘Die wesentlichen Eigenschaften der Gleit- und Rollenlager’ were remarkable for their time. Many of the findings were revolutionary and are still considered quite modern.

The method used by Stribeck to calculate load distribution between the balls within a ball bearing is still used today, otherwise, a full finite element analysis would be required.

His measurements and analysis of bearing friction is also astonishingly accurate. Most of the ball-bearing types studied by Stribeck are not in use any more, but the deep-groove ball bearings he investigated were similar enough to be compared with modern deep-groove ball bearings. Stribeck measured the friction coefficient 0.0015 and SKF gives the friction coefficient 0.0015 for deep-groove ball bearings in the catalogue from 1989. For the first time, in the SKF catalogue from 1989, the life calculation method took into account contamination also. Stribeck had stated already 100 years ago that cleanliness was very important for bearing life and function.

Stribeck’s investigation of journal bearing friction, as a function of load and speed, was also extremely important, as he showed the possibility of finding a point of minimum friction for lubricated applications. He also showed that the friction for sliding bearings started at high friction at low speeds, decreased to a minimum friction when metal to metal contact stopped, and then increased again at higher speeds, which is the well known ‘Stribeck curve’.

Introduction

It is now 101 and 100 years, respectively, since Richard Stribeck published his famous papers, ‘Kugellager für beliebige Belastungen’ (1901), and ‘Die wesentlichen Eigenshaften der Gleit- und Rollenlager’ (1902) in Zeitschrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure [[2], [3]]. The first paper treated the load-carrying capacity of ball bearings brilliantly and the second paper resolved the longstanding dispute over bearing friction characteristics as a function of load, speed and lubrication.

Stribeck [1] was born in Stuttgart in Germany on 7 July 1861. He received his basic education in his hometown where he finished his studies at the Technische Hochschule in Stuttgart. Later, he gained practical experience in various places, including Königsberg. At the age of 27, in 1888, he was back in his hometown, Stuttgart, and was appointed as Professor of Machine Construction at the Building School. Two years later, in 1890, he moved to the Technische Hochschule in Darmstadt. After three years, on 1 April 1893, he moved to the Technische Hochschule in Dresden. As Professor für Maschineningenieurswesen, he gave his inaugural address in Dresden on 6 May 1893 on the subject ‘Progress in the production of steam and in the exploitation of its energy in steam engines during the last 20 years’. Seven weeks later, on 1 July 1893, he went on a sabbatical leave to the United States of America.

Later, when he was back in Dresden, in the academic year 1896–1897, he was appointed to the governing body of the newly founded Machines Laboratory I (Strengths). He did not stay there long and moved to Berlin in March 1898. There, he became head of the metallurgical division of the Centralstelle für wissenschaftlich-technische Untersuchungen in Neubabelsberg, Berlin.

During the years 1889–1893, when Stribeck worked in Stuttgart and in Darmstadt, he published some 10 scientific papers. This large early output was mainly on giving solutions to the problems of boilers and steam turbines for marine applications. Only in the last paper in this group, Stribeck dealt with dynamic loading on the main and cross-head bearings of steam engines. That was thus the first time he became involved with tribology and tribological problems. When he was in Dresden, Stribeck studied gears, with particular emphasis on experimental studies of worm gear drives. He experimentally determined the limiting loading for correctly working worm gear drives as a function of load (F) and speed (n). He found that a hyperbola described the function well and that F·n=constant described the combination of load and speed, which could be allowed for any specific drive lubricated with a certain specific oil. In 1897, he published a paper on the consequences of wear of gears.

As mentioned above, Stribeck moved in 1898 to Berlin to work as one of the directors of the newly created Centralstelle für wissenschaftlich-technische Untersuchungen in Neubabelsberg, and to head the metallurgical division. There, he undertook and published the findings from his most basic tribological studies between 1898 and 1902. They were in two different areas: the load-carrying capacity of ball bearings and the friction characteristics of plain bearings and radial rolling element bearings. Stribeck applied sound physical principles to his experimental investigations, and used the theoretical background information available at that time.

In his very well known study on the load-carrying capacity of ball bearings Stribeck [2] gave scientific basis for the development of a large industry. He used the Hertzian contact theory, which by then had been known for 20 years, to connect the loads on the different balls to the external load. He then compared the loads on single ball contacts of different geometry, which were needed to give visible plastic deformations. He used three balls in contact, see Fig. 1, a steel plate sandwiched between two balls, and more conforming contacts of the type found in deep-groove ball bearings. Stribeck’s studies, which were commissioned by the Deutsche Waffen-und Munionsfabriken, Berlin, were epoch-making in their effect on the ball-bearing industry. Its major impact arose from the analysis of the carefully conducted experiments, see Fig. 2, and the sound appreciation of Hertzian contact theory, together with the presentation of practical formulae in a form suitable for the bearing designer. Stribeck’s approach to the question of load-carrying capacity of ball bearings was about seven years in advance of similar considerations in gear design.

Section snippets

Load-carrying capacity for ball bearings

Stribeck’s paper on ball bearings ‘Kugellager für beliebige Belastungen’ was published in Zeitschrift des Vereines deutcher Ingenieure on Saturday 19 January 1901, as a ‘Mitteilung aus der Zentralstelle für wissenschaftlich- techniche Untersuchungen’. Stribeck stated there that his results were applicable not only to ball bearings, but also to all other types of concentrated contacts of Hertzian type.

He used Hertz’ equations for deformation, contact dimension and contact pressure, and applied

Friction for ball bearings

One week later, on 26 January 1901, Stribeck published the second half of the paper ‘Ball bearings for varying loads’ (Kugellager für beliebige Belastungen), and there the friction in ball bearings was analysed. He elegantly split the power loss in each contact point into one rolling resistance component and one spinning resistance component, see Fig. 3. By summing up the power loss components, it was obvious that the power loss was proportional to the ratio of ring diameter to ball diameters,

Experiments with ball bearings

Stribeck designed and manufactured a friction torque measurement rig, which automatically compensated for the weight of the different moving parts, see Fig. 4. He was thereby able to measure the small friction with high accuracy. He found that for small amounts of lubricant in the bearings, the friction was independent of the temperature. His experiments were run at 65, 100, 130, 190, 380, 580, 780 and 1150 rpm, starting with the lowest speed. When decreasing the speed from 1150 rpm, Stribeck

Bearing lubrication

One and a half year later, Stribeck published his paper on friction and lubrication for journal bearings and rolling bearings, ‘Die wesentlichen Eigenshaften der Gleit- und Rollenlager’, starting on Saturday 6 September 1902, No. 36, of Zeitschrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure.

He wrote the paper in order to show which bearing type was the best performer under different running conditions, as no hard data were available for journal bearings. No information was available earlier on the

Journal bearings

Stribeck had found that not only roughly manufactured bearing surfaces needed to run-in for some time. How fast the running in process could be, was mainly a function of the bearing material. Fastest were some white metals, slightly slower were bearing bronzes and very slow was cast iron. Steel was practically impossible to run-in. The load possible to use during the running in process was also a strong function of the material. White metals could stand the highest running in load, and steel

The lubricant

Stribeck saw that the lubricant had a very strong influence on the friction, but also on the allowable load and the safety of the bearing function. If a bearing was run-in with one oil, another oil could start the running in anew or fail the bearing. The best oil found, and used for the tests, was ‘Gasmotorenöl’ delivered from ‘Gasmotorenfabrik Deutz’. The same oil had also been used in the earlier ball-bearing tests. The viscosity at 20 °C was 0.28 Ns/m2, at 40 °C, it was 0.075 Ns/m2, and at

Cast iron Sellers-bearing with ring-lubrication

Stribeck’s test bearings were different from most modern journal bearings, in that the bearing width (230 mm) was much larger than the diameter (70 mm), see Fig. 7. This made the bearing sensitive for shaft bending and misalignment. To avoid temperature transients, causing temperatures at different points in the bearing to differ by a few degrees, measurements were made slowly. Steady state temperatures were reached after 2–3 h of running. That also showed Stribeck that most machines in

White-metal bearings

The Sellers-bearings were unable to run-in by themselves, but the white-metal bearings were expected to easily run-in without any specific run-in procedure. Different low hardness alloys containing lead, tin and antimony were tested. Their yield points were low, hardly above 20 MPa. The bearing diameter was 70 mm and the bearing length was here 137 mm. The mean pressure for such long bearings was normally below 2.5 MPa and reached only exceptionally 5 MPa pressure. To reach such high pressures

The running-in

To get a smooth surface fast for the white-metal surface, running in was started at a low load (1.15 MPa) and a low speed (64 rpm). The friction decreased quickly from 0.020 and stabilised at 0.0028 after 18 h. The load was then increased and the running in restarted at 1.9 MPa pressure. The friction stabilised at 0.0022 after 16 h. When the load was increased later to 2.6 MPa, the coefficient of friction was strongly increased, and still after 6 h, it was 0.0044, double the value for lower

The run-in bearing lubricated with gas motor oil (gasmotorenöl)

When the bearing was so well run-in that no metallic contact occurred for the running conditions tested, Stribeck measured the coefficient of friction as a function of temperature for loads from 0.07 to 7.5 MPa and speeds from 190 to 1100 rpm. The minimum friction was around 0.005 for the highest load and temperature. Stribeck compared the change in viscosity and temperature with the change in friction. He then saw that the friction was not proportional to the viscosity, but the oil film

Roller bearings

Stribeck also investigated a number of roller bearings with different types of long cylindrical rollers to compare their friction and load-carrying capacity with ball bearings and hydrodynamic journal bearings. The five bearing types he studied were Laschenrollenlager, bearings with loose tube-formed rollers mounted on small shafts, Kynoch’s roller bearings, Hyatt bearings, and bearings from Mossberg & Granville Mfg. Co.

The Laschenrollenlager had loose rollers coupled together 4 by 4 using

Conclusions

Stribeck’s publications ‘Kugellager für beliebige Belastungen’ and ‘Die wesentlichen Eigenschaften der Gleit- und Rollenlager’ were remarkable for their time. Many of the findings were revolutionary and are still considered quite modern.

The method used by Stribeck to calculate load distribution between the balls within a ball bearing is still used today, otherwise, a full finite element analysis would be required.

His measurements and analysis of bearing friction is also astonishingly accurate.

References (3)

  • D. Dowson

    History of tribology

    (1979)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (105)

  • Enhancement of hydrodynamic friction by periodic variation of contact stiffness

    2022, Extreme Mechanics Letters
    Citation Excerpt :

    For more compliant materials the effect of deformations on the contact geometry and pressure profile, as well as hysteretic friction forces need be considered [8–12]. Depending on the sliding velocity and the normal load, lubrication can be divided into elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication (EHL), mixed, and boundary lubrication regimes [13,14]. Our interest in this work is confined to the EHL regime, where there is no solid–solid contact between the lubricated surfaces.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text