Suitability of arable weeds as indicator organisms to evaluate species conservation effects of management in agricultural ecosystems
Introduction
More than 38% of the total area of Germany are arable fields and about 16% is grassland (Statistisches Bundesamt, 1998). The majority of the remainder is used for commercial production forest, settlement, and traffic. Thus, agriculture is the most important type of land use in Germany and the importance of agricultural land for recreation, wellbeing, and species diversity is evident. In the course of intensive farming over the last decades this diversity has suffered a severe decline (Meisel, 1984, Blab et al., 1989, Plachter, 1991, Albrecht, 1995). To counteract this development, most of the German federal states took measures to conserve the organism diversity in agro-ecosystems. Well known examples for these activities were the field margin strip program (Schumacher, 1980) and the program for birds breeding in meadows (Hutterer et al., 1993). On a global scale, governments as well as non-governmental organizations began to develop concepts to conserve and increase biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems, following the environmental summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 (Nellinger, 2000). Corresponding indicators proposed by OECD (1999) are the diversity of “domesticated” plants and livestock, as well as “wildlife” biodiversity. For particular agro-ecosystems, however, it was considered that further research is needed to find out representative “key indicator” wildlife species.
The aim of the present study is to examine the use of arable weeds as indicator organisms of biodiversity in agro-ecosystems to evaluate species conservation effects of management practices. The ecosystematic relevance, the relation to the management, the influence of temporal and spatial variation on the measurability and the time needed for inventory are examination criteria. In addition, the selection of appropriate methods to evaluate species diversity and socioeconomic effects of different conservation strategies are discussed.
Section snippets
Ecosystematic relevance
“Key species” are defined as those species, the loss of which leads to serious changes in the remaining biocoenosis (Calow, 1998). Arable weeds belong to the carbon autotrophic producers which provide food for the consumers in agro-ecosystems. The importance of this relation was impressively demonstrated by Heydemann (1983) who found 1200 phytophageous animal species feeding on the 100 most frequent arable weeds.
In search of suitable indicator groups for biodiversity in cultivated ecosystems
Relation to management practice
As a high density of arable weeds can cause severe problems by reducing the yield and the quality of cultivated crops, weed control is an essential element of arable farming. This obvious impact on farm management may rise the question if such species should be considered at all in nature conservation activities. One reason for such efforts is that only a small percentage of the arable weed species cause remarkable infestation damage. Of 306 plant species listed by Hofmeister and Garve (1998)
Criteria to evaluate weed species diversity
The total number of species includes species characteristic for the living conditions in a certain habitat and ubiquitous generalists. As the characteristic species are greatly affected by changes in land use and intensification than the generalists, they should be considered with more importance in nature conservation issues. Another argument to select only the characteristic species for the evaluation of plant species diversity in arable fields is that highly noxious perennials like Cirsium
Temporal variation
Great temporal variation in the apparent part of populations is a factor which makes it generally difficult to record organisms occurring in agricultural ecosystems.
One important reason for the differences between the number of weed species found in different arable crops under central European climate conditions is the seasonal variation of temperature. This is caused by cold spells in autumn and early spring favoring weeds with a strong adaptation to germination at low temperatures (Otte, 1996
Spatial variation
Spatial variation is another factor which may aggravate an accurate evaluation of the species diversity in arable weed communities. At a field scale, this variation can be caused by differences in natural site conditions and former management. To overcome this problem using a sophisticated sampling method, Frieben (1998) recommended to record the species observed when crossing the field until no more new species can be found. Doubtlessly, this method is precise but also very time intensive.
To
Economic implications
For the realization of nature conservation issues the costs and time expense for corresponding measures are of importance.
Programs which pay for the results of management like a high number of species or the presence of rare weeds necessitate control measures. To estimate the costs of such a control, an approximate calculation was drawn up for the Federal Republic of Germany. This country has an arable area of 11.8 million ha and an estimated average field size of 4 ha. Given a participation of
Conclusions
Both a high sensitivity to cultivation measures and a strong relation to other organism groups make weeds suitable indicators to evaluate management effects on wildlife diversity in arable fields. Considerations presented in Chapter 8 show that recording weed assemblages could feasibly be carried out even in a high number of fields. It remains however uncertain, whether nature conservation authorities are willing to pay several million Euros each year for a system to control the maintenance of
References (45)
- et al.
The effect of organic and integrated farming on rare arable weeds on the Forschungsverbund Agrarökosysteme München (FAM) research station in southern Bavaria
Biol. Conserv.
(1998) - Albrecht, H., 1995. Changes in the arable weed flora of Germany during the last five decades. In: Proceedings of the...
- et al.
The weed seed bank in a landscape segment in southern Bavaria. II. Relation to environmental factors and to the soil surface vegetation
Plant Ecol.
(1997) - et al.
Veronica triphyllos L. in the Tertiärhügelland landscape in southern Bavaria—an example for habitat isolation of a stenoeceous plant species in agroecosystems
Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz
(1999) - et al.
Site effects on plant and animal distribution at the Scheyern experimental farm
Ecol. Stud.
(2001) - et al.
Etude de la dynamique d’une communauté adventice. I. Evolution de la flore adventice au cours du cycle végétatif d’une culture
Weed Res.
(1980) - et al.
Unkrautflora auf Feldern mit unterschiedlich langer ökologischer Bewirtschaftung
Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, Sonderheft
(1998) - et al.
Veränderungen und neue Entwicklungen im Gefährdungs- und Schutzstatus der Wirbeltiere in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz
(1989) - Boatman, N.D., 2002. Relationship between weeds, herbicides and birds. In: Marshall, E.J.P., Brown, V.K., Boatman,...
- et al.
The agronomic consequences and costs of managing field margins for game and wildlife conservation
Aspects Appl. Biol.
(1988)