Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 361, Issue 9357, 15 February 2003, Pages 545-552
The Lancet

Articles
Interferons in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12512-3Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Recombinant interferons have been approved by many national regulatory agencies for treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, but widespread discussion continues about their true effectiveness, benefits, side-effects, and costs.

Methods

With the Cochrane Collaboration methodology, we reviewed all published, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of recombinant interferons undertaken in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis between 1993 and 2002. Our primary aim was to find out whether recombinant interferons reduced the number of patients who had clinical exacerbations and disease progression, compared with placebo.

Findings

The seven trials that met our criteria included 1215 randomised patients: data from 667 (55%) were available for analysis at 1 year's and from 919 (76%) at 2 years' follow-up. Interferon seemed to reduce the number of patients who had exacerbations during the first year of treatment (relative risk 0·73, 95% CI 0·54–0·99), but results at 2 years' follow-up were not robust and were difficult to interpret because of the many dropouts. Although the number of patients who had exacerbations (0·81, 0·74–0·89) or progressed (0·70, 0·55–0·88) during the first 2 years fell significantly in the protocol analysis, results were inconclusive after sensitivity analyses for exacerbations (1·11, 0·73–1·68) and disease progression (1·31, 0·60–2·89). Data were insufficient to establish whether steroid use and admissions to hospital were reduced in the interferon group. Similarly, MRI outcome data could not be analysed quantitatively. Side-effects were common, and acute toxic effects adversely affected quality of life.

Interpretation

Recombinant interferons slightly reduce the number of patients who have exacerbations during first year of treatment. Their clinical effect beyond 1 year is uncertain and new trials are needed to assess their long-term effectiveness and side-effects.

Introduction

Use of interferons in multiple sclerosis has been studied for more than 20 years. Interferons exert effects of potential relevance to multiple sclerosis: their antiviral action, and their pleiotropic effects on the immune system and blood-brain barrier, could benefit patients with multiple sclerosis.1

Results of some early pilot trials showed fewer exacerbations in multiple sclerosis patients given human interferon than in those on placebo.2, 3 Recombinant interferons were approved by many national regulatory agencies for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, after clinical trials established that interferon beta preparations reduced disease activity.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Interferon beta-1b is now also licensed for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis9 and interferon beta-1a for the treatment of patients who have had a sole demyelinating event.10 Interferons have been used for the treatment of multiple sclerosis for almost a decade, and are available for this use free of charge from many national health services. However, doubts remain as to their effectiveness, in particular whether they can really prevent progression of the disease and whether the effect is sustained over time.11 Furthermore, the beneficial effects might be small or non-existent in relation to untoward side-effects and high cost.12

We therefore undertook an assessment of the methodological quality of interferon trials, and did a meta-analysis of the results. Our primary question was: are recombinant interferons more effective than placebo in reduction of the number of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis who have clinical exacerbations and disease progression? Our secondary objectives were to assess the effectiveness of recombinant interferons in reduction of the need for treatment with corticosteroids and hospital admission, the incidence and severity of side-effects, and the effect of interferons on cerebral lesions as measured by serial MRI.

Section snippets

Methods

For our systematic review we applied the Cochrane Collaboration methodology (www.cochrane.org) and followed our predefined protocol.13 We assessed only randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that compared alfa or beta recombinant interferons with placebo in patients diagnosed with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis according to accepted criteria.14 Trials in which the comparisons of interest were confounded by other treatments, such as immunosuppressive drugs, were excluded.

We

Results

We identified 227 abstracts (144 in MEDLINE, 23 in EMBASE, 46 by hand-searching, and 14 in the Cochrane controlled trials register). 24 studies were identified as potentially fulfilling inclusion criteria. We excluded 17 studies after reading the full published papers: a randomised controlled trial of ingested interferon alfa-2a;19 two controlled clinical trials;20, 21 two open-label trials;22, 23 four studies of natural interferon alfa;24, 25, 26, 27 two in which only immunological, not

Discussion

Our results show a modest protective effect of interferon against recurrence of exacerbations during the first year of treatment. This effect could not be confirmed during the second year since the results were highly dependent on what happened to the dropouts. We analysed all the randomised controlled trials undertaken so far on the use of interferon in patients with the relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis. Most trials had major weaknesses. The commonest flaws were high dropout

References (46)

  • DerSimonianR et al.

    Meta-analysis in clinical trials

    Control Clin Trials

    (1986)
  • RudgeP et al.

    Does interferon beta cause initial exacerbation of multiple sclerosis?

    Lancet

    (1995)
  • HohlfeldR

    Biotechnological agents for the immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis: principles, problems and perspectives

    Brain

    (1997)
  • JacobsL et al.

    Intrathecal interferon reduces exacerbations of multiple sclerosis

    Science

    (1981)
  • KnoblerRL et al.

    Systemic alpha-interferon therapy of multiple sclerosis

    Neurology

    (1984)
  • Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: I Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Neurology

    (1993)
  • Interferon beta-1b in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: final outcome of the randomized controlled trial

    Neurology

    (1995)
  • PatyDW et al.

    Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: II MRI analysis results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Neurology

    (1993)
  • JacobsLD et al.

    A phase III trial of intramuscular recombinant interferon beta as treatment for exacerbating-remitting multiple sclerosis: design and conduct of study and baseline characteristics of patients

    Mult Scler

    (1995)
  • JacobsLD et al.

    Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis

    Ann Neurol

    (1996)
  • Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): Betaferon

    (2002)
  • Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): Avonex

    (2002)
  • NoseworthyJH et al.

    Multiple Sclerosis

    N Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • ForbesRB et al.

    Population based cost utility study of interferon beta-1b in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

    BMJ

    (1999)
  • Interferon in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (Cochrane protocol)

  • PoserCM et al.

    New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols

    Ann Neurol

    (1983)
  • KurtzkeJF

    Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS)

    Neurology

    (1983)
  • JüniP et al.

    Assessing the quality of randomised controlled trials

  • EbrahimS

    Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses: pitfalls and cautions

  • BrodSA et al.

    Ingested IFN-alpha: results of a pilot study in relapsing-remitting MS

    Neurology

    (2001)
  • TilberyCP et al.

    Interferon beta 1-a in multiple sclerosis: 1-year experience in 62 patients

    Arq Neuropsiquiatr

    (2000)
  • NarayananS et al.

    Axonal metabolic recovery in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta-1b

    J Neurol

    (2001)
  • HerndonRM et al.

    Results of an ongoing, open-label, safety-extension study of interferon beta-1a (Avonex) treatment in multiple sclerosis

    Int J MS Care

    (1999)
  • Cited by (290)

    • The combined treatment of NAD<sup>+</sup> and atorvastatin ameliorates the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in C57BL/6 mice

      2021, Journal of Neuroimmunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, not all MS patients have perfect responses to these drugs (Guo et al., 2008; Kala et al., 2010; Van Kaer, 2011; Podbielska et al., 2012). Additionally, these drugs may be associated with inevitable side effects and undesirable toxicities (Filippini et al., 2003; Munari and Filippini, 2004; Yousry et al., 2006). Therefore, it is of importance to explore existing or novel agents that can complement one another in combination to exhibit synergistic effect on MS patients for a better treatment.

    • Physical Activity and the Mosaic of Autoimmunity

      2019, Mosaic of Autoimmunity: The Novel Factors of Autoimmune Diseases
    • Headache characteristics in multiple sclerosis

      2019, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text