The evolution of bipedality and loss of functional body hair in hominids

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(84)80079-2Get rights and content

The large relative brain size of hominids, and their lack of an effective carotid rete, means they are vulnerable to thermal damage during elevations of body temperature. This would account for the well developed whole-body cooling system of man, provided by a functionally naked skin and associated cutaneous sweat glands. It is argued that the lower direct solar radiation fluxes incident upon a bipedal mammal made possible the reduction of body hair, and explains the absence of this characteristic among savannah quadrupeds. The major thermoregulatory advantages conferred by bipedality, to an animal extremely sensitive to hyperthermia, could also account for the initial evolution of this unusual form of locomotion.

References (38)

  • IngramY. et al.

    Man and Animals in Hot Environments

    (1975)
  • JacquezJ.A. et al.

    Spectral reflectance of human skin in the region 235–700 nm

    Journal of Applied Physiology

    (1955)
  • JacquezJ.A. et al.

    Spectral reflectance of human skin in the region 0·7–2·6 μm

    Journal of Applied Physiology

    (1955)
  • JerisonH.J.

    Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence

    (1973)
  • JohansonD.C. et al.

    A systematic assessment of early African hominids

    Science

    (1979)
  • KerslakeD.

    The Stress of Hot Environments

    (1972)
  • KleiberM.

    The Fire of Life

    (1961)
  • LehningerA.L.

    Biochemistry

    (1975)
  • LovejoyC.O.

    The origin of man

    Science

    (1981)
  • Cited by (150)

    • The relative limb size of Homo naledi

      2022, Journal of Human Evolution
    • Comparative evidence for the independent evolution of hair and sweat gland traits in primates

      2018, Journal of Human Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the developmental origins of this striking appearance are unclear. Hypotheses to explain the human condition include overall reduction in hair density (Schultz, 1931; Newman, 1970; Schwartz and Rosenblum, 1981; Wheeler, 1984; Folk and Semken, 1991; Sandel, 2013), miniaturization of body hair (Montagna, 1963, 1985; Montagna et al., 1992), or both (Schwartz and Rosenblum, 1981; Sandel, 2013). To our knowledge, the only previously published study of comparative hair density in humans and other primates evaluated only hairs larger than 2 mm in length (Schultz, 1931).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text