How to measure supersaturation?
Introduction
As the thermodynamic driving force, supersaturation is the most decisive parameter for crystallization processes. It has a tremendous influence on mechanisms occurring during a crystallization process like:
- •
crystal growth,
- •
agglomeration and aggregation, and
- •
primary and secondary nucleation.
Therefore, the product quality characterized by
- •
crystal morphology,
- •
crystal purity,
- •
specific surface area, and
- •
crystal size distribution
Nevertheless, in many batch cooling crystallization processes natural, linear or precalculated cooling rates are used to generate supersaturation. By applying one of these cooling methods, it is not possible to keep supersaturation throughout the crystallizer at an optimum level. Furthermore, no knowledge of the exact moment of seeding in batch crystallizers exists. Only the application of supersaturation sensors gives the possibility to add seed when supersaturation is obtained Kühberger 1997, Kühberger 1999.
Table 1 gives a short overview of the existing supersaturation measurement methods.
In Table 1 each described method has restrictions regarding its applicability, like certain ranges of temperature, turbidity, viscosity, or suspension density. As can be seen, a lot of different measurands for determining supersaturation are available, but all of them use physical properties (such as density, viscosity or electric conductivity) that show a dependence on concentration in order to obtain the actual level of supersaturation with the help of solubility data. Therefore, all existing measurement methods are more or less concentration measurements which are applicable in pure systems. The actual extent of the driving force of crystallization, the supersaturation, cannot be quantified. Additionally, these concentration-dependent measurement methods require a solubility diagram of the system valid for the actual composition including all impurities. In case of changing or alternating compositions of the mother liquor, this requirement is very hard to fulfil.
A schematic measuring procedure can be seen from Fig. 1. The crystallization process in itself is not considered in the various measurement principles. In case of alternating compositions or changing impurities of the mother liquor, solubility data for each possible composition or impurity would be required, if the right supersaturation should be determined by the way described above.
If impurities (e.g. foreign particles) or other process disturbances exist, the measuring of supersaturation using physical properties of the solution still results in the same value as before. However, it is well known that such impurities influence the metastable zone width and the kinetics of nucleation and crystal growth. As a consequence, the crystallization performance changes without any chance of reacting in adequate time to avoid a reduction of the product quality.
Section snippets
Measuring method
One possible way to gather the complete information of all parameters influencing crystallization processes, including the supersaturation, is to induce a crystallization on the surface of the sensor and to observe the development in time of the first deposition of solid matter which finally leads to incrustation. Therefore, the basic idea of the new measurement method is to conduct an accelerated crystallization according to the current process and to observe it. The main idea is illustrated
Sensors
In the first functional prototype, two different devices for the detection of the incrustation on the sensor surface, the interdigital transducer (IDT) and the surface acoustic wave sensor (SAW), were integrated.
Experiments
Intention of the first experiments was to prove the applicability of the sensor and to test the reproducibility of the measurements. Thus, it was necessary to provide constant conditions for these experiments. For this reason the experiments were performed in beakers (no fluid flow) containing KNO3 solutions of various degrees of undersaturation. Expressing the concentration in an undercooling with respect to the saturation temperature and keeping these solutions at a constant temperature of
Conclusions
The experiments with potassium nitrate showed the working of the measurement method and the ability of the new sensor to determine different degrees of saturation. The results of the monitored batch cooling crystallizations of adipic acid demonstrated the high potential and applicability of the system. The major advantage of this sensor lies in the direct measurement of the driving force (and not of a concentration) of crystallization including every influence caused by impurities or other
Notation
concentration, solubility, frequency, Hz time, s temperature, K saturation temperature, K cooling rate, K/s impedance, Greek letters specific inductive capacity electric conductivity, S/m dynamic viscosity, Pa s density, Superscripts and subscripts meas measurement proc process sensor sensor signal signal start start sol solution
References (8)
Acoustic sensors based on surface-localized HPSWs for measurements in liquids
Sensors and Actuators
(1993)Improved product quality at a cooling crystallization process by measurement and control of supersaturation
Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers
(1997)- et al.
How to predict metastable zone widths
Journal of Crystal Growth
(1998) - Kühberger, M. (1999). Neue Sensoren zur Messung und Regelung der Úbersättigung in Kristallisatoren. Ph.D. thesis,...
Cited by (41)
Simulation and experimental investigation of a novel supersaturation feedback control strategy for cooling crystallization in semi-batch implementation
2020, Chemical Engineering ScienceCitation Excerpt :Concentration feedback control (CFC), often also called supersaturation control (SSC), has been widely applied in cooling and antisolvent crystallization systems at laboratory as well as industrial scales, by which improved crystal attributes have been extensively demonstrated (Braatz, 2002; Nagy and Braatz, 2012; Nagy et al., 2013). Supersaturation is the driving force of the crystallization process and numerous researchers (Gutwald and Mersmann, 1990; Löffelmann and Mersmann, 2002) have showed that an optimal supersaturation exists for a crystallization process, and various methods for supersaturation measurement and implementation of constant supersaturation control strategy have been investigated. Generally, for a typical batch cooling crystallization process, the supersaturation is calculated by using real-time concentration measurement and the solubility equation, and then the temperature would be adjusted to maintain the designed supersaturation set point.
A statistical experimental design to remove sulfate by crystallization in a fluidized-bed reactor
2017, Sustainable Environment ResearchCitation Excerpt :The production of high quality crystals greatly depends on the nature and amount of seed material and the control of supersaturation [16]. Improved supersaturation can result from higher inlet sulfate concentrations and on the method of addition and concentration of the precipitating agent [17]. All chemicals used in the experiment were of reagent grade.
Impact of roughness, wettability and hydrodynamic conditions on the incrustation on stainless steel surfaces
2017, Applied Thermal EngineeringCitation Excerpt :The incrustation is a problem not only in the crystallization processes, but also in a number of other operations where e.g. process water is heated. Most of the experimental research were carried out using continuous systems where the formation of crystalline build-ups was observed on the heat transfer surfaces such as walls of plate heat exchangers [5,10,24], shell and tube heat exchangers [8,15] and cross-flow systems [16,17]. One can also find information on batch processes [4].
A succinct review of the treatment of Reverse Osmosis brines using Freeze Crystallization
2015, Journal of Water Process EngineeringComparison of dielectric constant meter with turbidity meter and focused beam reflectance measurement for metastable zone width determination
2012, Chemical Engineering Research and DesignCitation Excerpt :This parameter is known to be process dependent and can be influenced by numerous factors including cooling rate, solvent composition, mechanical agitation, impurities in the solution, etc. (Nyvlt et al., 1985). Many process analytical technologies (PATs) have been developed in the past decade for in situ determination of the MZW during solution crystallization processes (Kumar et al., 1996; Groen and Roberts, 2001; Lewiner et al., 2001; Fujiwara et al., 2002; Löffelmann and Mersmann, 2002; Marciniak, 2002; Gürbüz and Özdemir, 2003; Parsons et al., 2003; Genceli et al., 2005; Pöllänen et al., 2006; Schöll et al., 2006; O’Grady et al., 2007; Simon et al., 2009a). These techniques include, but are not limited to, direct visual observation using hot stage microscopy (HSM) (Kumar et al., 1996), in-process video microscopy (PVM) (Barrett and Glennon, 2002) and bulk video imaging (Simon et al., 2009b); detection of the presence of solid particles using focused beam reflectance measurement (FBRM) (Fujiwara et al., 2002; Schöll et al., 2006; O’Grady et al., 2007) and turbidity meter (Parsons et al., 2003); thermal method using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) (Myerson and Jang, 1999); and monitoring of the solute concentration change via bulk solution property measurements using attenuated reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) (Groen and Roberts, 2001; Lewiner et al., 2001; Fujiwara et al., 2002; Pöllänen et al., 2006; Schöll et al., 2006; O’Grady et al., 2007; Trifkovica et al., 2009), ultra-violet–visible (UV–vis) spectroscopy (Simon et al., 2009a), densitometer (Marciniak, 2002), ultrasonic velocity meter (Marciniak, 2002; Gürbüz and Özdemir, 2003), quartz crystal sensor (Löffelmann and Mersmann, 2002), conductivity and refractive index meter (Genceli et al., 2005), etc.
Calibration of dielectric constant measurements to improve the detection of cloud and clear points in solution crystallization
2011, Chemical Engineering Research and DesignCitation Excerpt :Various process analytical technologies (PATs) have been utilized for MSZW determination during solution crystallization processes. Commonly used PATs include turbidity meter (Parsons et al., 2003) and focused beam reflectance measurement (FBRM) (Barrett and Glennon, 2002; Fujiwara et al., 2002; Schöll et al., 2006; O’Grady et al., 2007), which rely on the detection of solid particles; attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) (Groen and Roberts, 2001; Lewiner et al., 2001; Fujiwara et al., 2002; Pöllänen et al., 2006; Schöll et al., 2006; O’Grady et al., 2007), densitometer (Marciniak, 2002), ultrasonic velocity meter (Marciniak, 2002; Gürbüz and Özdemir, 2003), quartz crystal sensor (Löffelmann and Mersmann, 2002), conductivity and refractive index meter (Genceli et al., 2005), which monitor the bulk solution properties. Other techniques include direct visual observation using hot stage microscopy (HSM) (Kumar et al., 1996), bulk video imaging (Simon et al., 2009) and in-process video microscopy (PVM) (Barrett and Glennon, 2002).