Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 97, Issue 3, February 2001, Pages 271-282
Biological Conservation

Population trends of resident wildebeest [Connochaetes taurinus hecki (Neumann)] and factors influencing them in the Masai Mara ecosystem, Kenya

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00090-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Population trends of resident wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus hecki (Neumann)) and factors influencing them in Masai Mara ecosystem between 1977 and 1997 were investigated. Population trends were analyzed using aerial census data collected through systematic reconnaissance flights. Aerial censuses pertaining to resident wildebeest populations (non-migratory) were identified from migratory populations through spatial analysis. Regression analysis was used for population trend analysis. The impact of land use changes on wildebeest population was analyzed by comparing changes in wildebeest densities in cropped and non-cropped areas. Relationship between population size and rainfall fluctuations was used to assess the influence of rainfall on trends. Comparison of cattle densities in cropped and non-cropped areas was used to get an insight into possible competition between cattle and wildebeest for food. The results show that resident wildebeest population in the Masai Mara ecosystem has declined from about 119,000 in 1977 to about 22,000 in 1997, an 81% decline. The decline is mainly attributed to loss of former resident wildebeest wet season grazing, calving and breeding ranges to agriculture. Rainfall fluctuations and possible competition between wildebeest and cattle during periods of limited food resources may have further contributed to the decline.

Introduction

The Masai Mara National Reserve (MMNR) and adjoining group ranches (hereafter referred to as Masai Mara Ecosystem) in Kenya, form the northern portion of the Serengeti–Mara ecosystem to which wild animals (especially wildebeest and zebra) migrate annually. The ecosystem has the richest wildlife resources and offers the most spectacular wildlife watching in Kenya (Stelfox et al., 1986). These rich wildlife resources to a certain extent depend on the facilitation process maintained by annual migration of wildebeest and zebra. The wildebeest and zebra from Serengeti National Park migrate and stay in the Masai Mara ecosystem between June and November (Maddock, 1979). They occupy mainly the reserve and the adjoining group ranches. The resident wildebeest population also migrate between the reserve and the adjoining dispersal areas (Fig. 1) within the ecosystem. These migrations clearly show that the protected area (the reserve) is not adequate for the protection and viability of migratory wildlife species in the ecosystem. Rarely can wildlife parks be established so as to encompass an entire ecosystem. For this reason the viability of wildlife inside most protected areas is frequently influenced by outside factors (Jansen, 1986).

Habitat fragmentation or complete habitat loss is thought to be responsible for many wildlife species becoming endemic or extinct (Prins and Olff, 1998, Caughley and Sinclair, 1994). Prins and Olff (1998) note that an ecosystem that becomes smaller due to areas being put under cultivation (where wild grazers cannot occur any more) will show a decrease in species packing. This is the result of increased competition, although local extinctions may play a role too. Norton-Griffiths (1995) also notes that wildlife managers are most concerned about the conversion of privately owned rangelands to agriculture and ranching. Lado (1996) observes that the most serious long-term threat to the future of wildlife populations in Kenya is the indirect effects on habitat resource destruction or alteration. In Africa, the increasing conversion of natural lands to agriculture and human settlements is mainly attributed to increasing human population and is thought to be responsible for the increasing decline in wildlife resources (Johan, 1995).

The wildebeest is a flagship or keystone species in the Masai Mara ecosystem because of its occurrence in large numbers and its annual migrations within and outside the ecosystem (Talbot and Talbot, 1963, Sinclair, 1995). Their migration generate, through their grazing activities, optimal conditions for other large mammals, a process generally referred to as facilitation (Bell, 1970, Bell, 1971, Prins and Olff, 1998). This facilitation can only be sustained through regular migrations between protected and dispersal areas. However, the dispersal areas are increasingly being converted from pastoral grazing areas to agricultural and human settlement areas (Sinclair, 1995, Norton-Griffiths, 1995). For example, between 1975 and 1995, the area under wheat in the Masai Mara ecosystem has increased from 4875 ha in 1975 (Karime, 1990) to 11,000 ha in 1985 to 50,000 ha in 1995 (Serneels et al., in press). The long-term impact of these land use changes on the population of the wildlife species (especially the migrants) has not been studied. However, a number of studies undertaken in the ecosystem indicate that populations of most wildlife species are on the decline (Ottichilo et al., in press, Grunblatt, Said and Warugute, 1996, Broten and Said, 1995, Sitati, 1997).

In this study we analyze the trends of the resident wildebeest population in Masai Mara ecosystem over the past 20 years (1977–1997). We further analyze the relationship between crop (wheat) expansion, rainfall fluctuations and cattle density and wildebeest population trends.

Section snippets

Study area

The current study was carried out in c. 6000 km2 of the Masai Mara ecosystem, in the southern part of Narok district, Kenya. Following Stelfox et al. (1986) we distinguished four range management units in the study area (Fig. 1). The Masai Mara National Reserve (MMNR) and the Mara group ranches are mainly composed of Themeda grassland. Dwarf-shrubland and Acacia drepanolobium grassland characterize the Loita plains while Siana consists mainly of hills and plains supporting Croton shrubland and

Data collection

In the current study we used animal counts from 42 censuses conducted in the ecosystem between 1977 and 1997. The data was collected by the Department of Resource Surveys and Remote Sensing (DRSRS) using a systematic reconnaissance flight (Norton-Griffiths, 1978). The data and method appear reliable (De Leeuw et al., 1998, Ottichilo and Khaemba in press). The ecosystem was surveyed along transects oriented in east-west direction and spaced at 5 km intervals. Flying heights were c. 90 m

Populations trends

We first regressed the 21 wildebeest population estimates against time in order to determine whether there was evidence of trend in the resident wildebeest population. The factor time was expressed as year of observation, with decimals indicating the day number within the year. The dependent variable (wildebeest population estimate) was log transformed prior to analysis because exploratory data analysis revealed non-linearity in its relationship with time. The null hypothesis was: Ho:β=0, the

Spatial distribution

Fig. 2, which shows the weighted mean centre of the distribution of wildebeest for the 42 censuses, reveals two distinct clusters. The southwesterly cluster, situated within and around the MMNR, is located at distances of <40 km from the Tanzanian border. A second cluster in the Loita plains is located at distances of >60 km from the Tanzanian border. Two censuses are located somewhat in the middle of these two clusters.

Fig. 3A shows a relationship between the distance from the Tanzanian border

Wildebeest population trends

In this study we have shown a significant decline in the size of the resident wildebeest population from about 119,000 in 1977 to an estimated 22,000 in 1997, about 81%. The decline has occurred mainly in Loita plains which are the main calving and breeding grounds of wildebeest in southwestern Kenya (Talbot and Talbot, 1963, Lamprey, 1984). Population estimates from earlier counts indicate that in 1961 the resident wildebeest population in the Masai Mara ecosystem was c. 18,000 (Stewart and

Conclusions

Overall, we have shown in this study that the resident wildebeest population in the Masai Mara ecosystem has drastically declined in the past 20 years. We have further shown that this decline is mainly related to habitat loss, due to agricultural encroachment. Therefore, it is extremely urgent that concerned authorities and stakeholders take necessary measures that will strike a balance between wildlife conservation and agricultural development if the current downward wildebeest population

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our thanks and gratitude to Mr. Hesbon M. Alugula, the Director of Department of Resource Surveys and Remote Sensing (DRSRS) for providing to us the data used in this analysis. Second, we are thankful to Messrs. Mohammed Said, Evanson C. Njuguna and Gordon Ojwang for their help in data screening and extraction. Third, we are thankful to World Bank and Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) for funding DRSRS to collect the data. Lastly, we wish to express our

References (49)

  • Amuyunzu, C.L., 1984. Land resources inventory as a basis of land evaluation and rural development: the role of remote...
  • Amting, E., 1997. Temporal and spatial variation in grassland biomass in Masai Mara game reserve and adjoining areas,...
  • Azumi, E., MacDonald, M., 1993. Wildebeest and Wheat: Crafting a Land Policy in Kenya's Maasailand. Ministry of...
  • R.H.V Bell

    The use of herb layer by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti

  • R.H.V Bell

    A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti

    Scientific American

    (1971)
  • Broten, M.D., Said, M., 1995. Population trends of ungulates in and around Kenya's Masai Mara Reserve. In: Sinclair,...
  • G Caughley et al.

    Wildlife Ecology and Management

    (1994)
  • J De Leeuw et al.

    Interpretation of DRSRS Animal Counts (1977–1997) in the Rangeland Districts of Kenya

    (1998)
  • Dirschl, H.J., Norton-Griffiths, M., Wetmore, S.P., 1981. Training observers for aerial surveys of herbivores. The...
  • Douglas-Hamilton, I., 1988. Identification Study for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Natural Resources in...
  • R.H Drent et al.

    The herbivore as prisoner of its food supply

  • H.T Dublin et al.

    Elephants and fire as causes of multiple stable states in the Serengeti-Mara woodlands

    Journal of Animal Ecology

    (1990)
  • Grunblatt, J., Said, M., Warugute, P., 1996. National Rangeland Report. Summary of Population Estimates of Wildlife and...
  • R.M Hansen et al.

    Diets and trophic ranking of ungulates on northern Serengeti

    Journal of Wildlife Management

    (1985)
  • D.H Jansen

    The eternal external threat

  • Johan, T.T., 1995. Determinants of the composition and distribution of wildlife communities in Southern Africa. Ambio...
  • Jolly, G.M., 1969. Sampling methods for aerial censuses of wildlife populations. East African Agricultural and Forestry...
  • Karime, N.I., 1990. The Changing Land Use Patterns on the Ngorengore Loita Plains. Department of Resource Surveys and...
  • Khaemba, W.M., Stein, A., in press. Spatial statistics for modelling of abundance and distribution of wildlife species...
  • L Lado

    Problems of wildlife management and land use in Kenya

    Land Use Policy

    (1996)
  • Lamprey, R.H., 1984. Maasai Impact on the Kenya Savanna Vegetation: A Remote Sensing Approach. PhD thesis, University...
  • L Maddock

    The “migration” and grazing succession

  • Mduma, S., Hilborn, R., Sinclair, A.R.E., 1998. Limits to exploitation of Serengeti wildebeest and the implications for...
  • Mwichabe, E.S., 1988. The Grassland of the Loita-Aitong-Mara plains (Narok District, Kenya): Their Composition,...
  • Cited by (69)

    • Long-term ecological changes influence herbivore diversity and abundance inside a protected area in the Mara-Serengeti ecosystem

      2019, Global Ecology and Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      These changes in habitat might be contributing to declining numbers of resident herbivores within and around the Reserve (Lamprey and Reid, 2004; Ogutu et al., 2009, 2005; 2011; Ottichilo et al., 2000; Serneels and Lambin, 2001). Since 1960, monitoring efforts have documented declines in observed resident herbivores at levels exceeding 50% for some species, both inside and outside Reserve boundaries (Homewood et al., 2001; Ogutu et al., 2011, 2016; Ottichilo et al., 2000, 2001; Serneels and Lambin, 2001; Veldhuis et al., 2019). Migrant herbivores visiting the Reserve have also declined by 35% since 1984 (Norton-Griffiths et al., 2008).

    • An assessment of the value of an African landscape. The case of the Mara Basin, Kenya

      2018, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth
      Citation Excerpt :

      The wildlife value (from tourism) was related to the biomass production varied using the ranking of wildlife habitats as shown in Fig. 8. The wildlife valuation corresponds with the spatial distribution of wildlife herds and the migration pattern in the landscape of the Maasai Mara National Park (Ottichilo et al., 2001; Heritage Hotels Ltd, 2013). Wildlife benefits to the conservancies were assessed using the rental payments to land owners for use of their land for wildlife tourism and conservation.

    • Ecological bridges and barriers in pelagic ecosystems

      2017, Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography
    • Population density of elephants and other key large herbivores in the Amboseli ecosystem of Kenya in relation to droughts

      2016, Journal of Arid Environments
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although numerous strategies and financial resources have been used to enhance wildlife conservation, there is rampant population decline of numerous species throughout the country such as the African elephant (Loxodonta africana), black rhino (Diceros bicornis), gravy zebra (Equus grevyi), and large carnivores especially lion (Panthera leo) and cheetah (Acynonix jubatus), various species of monkeys, hilora antelope among others (Western et al., 2009a). Numerous studies have examined the causes of decline of wildlife populations in different parts of Kenya (e.g. Ottichilo et al., 2000, 2001; Okello and Kiringe, 2004; Western et al., 2009a; b; Primack, 1998). Collectively, these studies reveal that a myriad of anthropogenic factors such as; human-wildlife conflicts, illegal wildlife poaching, bush meat activities, increase in human population, alienation or inadequate involvement of locals in conservation initiatives and programs, proliferation of inappropriate land uses like agriculture which compromise wildlife survival and its conservation are responsible for the decline of wildlife.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text