Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 34, Issue 3, June 1986, Pages 663-684
Animal Behaviour

The functions of stotting in Thomson's gazelles: some tests of the predictions

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80052-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Stotting in Thomson's gazelles (Gazella thomsoni) was found to have a negligible time cost in slow flights and it was normally shown in safe situations when prey were unlikely to be captured. Despite its probable energy cost and time cost during fast flights there was no evidence to show that, once a chase occurred, stotting gazelles were caught more or less often than gazelles that did not stott.

Eleven hypotheses concerning the benefits of stotting were tested using a number of predictions about the stotting individual, its conspecifics and the predator (usually cheetahs), some of which were pertinent to several hypotheses. Although a number of hypotheses were supported by some of the predictions, most were refuted by one or more pieces of evidence. Only two were satisfactorily supported by all of them: stotting appears to inform the predator that it has been detected, but it does not invite or deter the predator from pursuing the gazelle. In neonate Thomson's gazelles, stotting probably has a different function, it informs the mother that the neonate has been disturbed and is in need of defence. In addition, mothers whose neonates escaped capture by cheetahs stotted significantly more during the attempt than mothers whose neonates were caught. Hypotheses concerning the prey signalling its health, startling or confusing the predator; group cohesion; anti-ambush behaviour; play in young animals; warning of conspecifics; and pursuit invitation or deterrence were dismissed by data presented here.

References (41)

  • CoblentzB.E.

    On the improbability of pursuit invitation signals in mammals

    Am. Nat.

    (1980)
  • CraigJ.L.

    On the evidence for a ‘pursuit deterrent’ function of alarm signals of swamphens

    Am. Nat.

    (1982)
  • DawkinsR.
  • EstesR.D.

    The comparative behavior of Grant's and Thomson's gazelles

    J. Mammal.

    (1967)
  • EstesR.D. et al.

    Prey selection and hunting behaviour of the African wild dog

    J. Wildl. Mgmt

    (1967)
  • GuthrieR.D.

    A new theory of mammalian rump patch evolution

    Behaviour

    (1971)
  • HedigerH.

    Zur Biologie und Psychologie der Flucht bei Tieren

    Biol. Zbl.

    (1934)
  • HirthD.H. et al.

    Evolution of alarm signals in ungulates with special reference to white-tailed deer

    Am. Nat.

    (1977)
  • Hvidberg-HansenH. et al.

    Reproduction and herd structure of two Thomson's gazelle populations

    Mammalia

    (1971)
  • KruukH.
  • Cited by (116)

    • Animal Behavior

      2021, Animal Behavior
    • Biomimicry: New insights for entrepreneurship scholarship

      2019, Journal of Business Venturing Insights
    • Bovid mortality patterns from Kanjera South, Homa Peninsula, Kenya and FLK-Zinj, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania: Evidence for habitat mediated variability in Oldowan hominin hunting and scavenging behavior

      2019, Journal of Human Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is therefore useful to examine some aspects of extant carnivore predation behavior and prey vulnerabilities to reconstruct possible Oldowan hominin foraging strategies in different habitats. A factor in determining hunting success for modern carnivores is the predetection predator-to-prey distance: the closer a predator can get to its prey before detection, the greater the likelihood of hunting success (Elliott et al., 1977; Orsdol, 1984; Caro, 1986; FitzGibbon and Fanshawe, 1988). Predetection predator-to-prey distance is influenced by factors such as the presence of effective vegetation cover and the habits of prey species.

    • Alarm signals in goitered gazelle with special reference to stotting, hissing and alarm urination-defecation

      2018, Zoology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Stotting may be a part of assessment behavior, when a gazelle started to run and stot, but the jumps were performed in almost the same place (Walther, 1984), followed by the animal stopping to see if its short movement and stotting display provoked the predator to attack (Blank D, personal observation). Caro (1986a), though, disclaimed this interpretation, since stotting is a slower gait than galloping and reduces flight speed (Caro, 1994; Lingle and Pellis, 2002). Therefore stotting in Thomson’s gazelles (Walther, 1984; Caro, 1986a) and springbok (Bigalke, 1972), as well as bounding in white-tailed deer (Hirth and McCullough, 1977) were normally shown in safe situations, when the prey animals were unlikely to be captured.

    • Social cichlid fish change behaviour in response to a visual predator stimulus, but not the odour of damaged conspecifics

      2015, Behavioural Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is possible that behaviours, such as spending more time in the centre of the aquarium or swimming higher in the water column, represented attempts by the focal fish to dissuade the predator from making an attack. L. lemairii are ambush predators, and clearly signalling to the predator that the predator has been detected might in itself be an anti-predator strategy (Caro, 1986; Fischer et al., 2014). A study that simultaneously assesses defensive behaviours, as well as the predator avoidance behaviours examined in the current study, would be valuable in disentangling responses of N. pulcher to predator threats, and would help determine if an increase in defensive behaviours could explain the pattern of results we found.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text