Regular articleThe classifier problem in Chinese aphasia☆
References (40)
- et al.
The noun-verb problem in Chinese aphasia
Brain and Language
(1991) - et al.
Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study
Brain and Language
(1987) - et al.
Grammatical morphology in aphasia: Evidence from three languages
Cortex
(1987) - et al.
Grammatical morphology in aphasia: A reply to Niemi et al
Cortex
(1988) - et al.
On the preservation of word order in aphasia: Cross-linguistic evidence
Brain & Language
(1988) - et al.
A multicomponent view of agrammatic Broca's aphasia
On grammatical deficits in Chinese aphasia
- et al.
Patterns of dissociation in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs
Aphasiology
(1988) - et al.
The structuring of language: Clue from the acquisition of signed and spoken language
Production of grammatical morphology in Serbo-Croatian-speaking patients
Crosslinguistic studies of aphasia
Comparative aphasiology: A cross-linguistic approach to language breakdown
Aphasiology
Comparative aphasiology: A cross-linguistic approach to language breakdown
Aphasiology
Semantic processing in aphasia: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task
Brain and Language
Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia
Brain and Language
The acquisition of numeral classifiers in Thai
Linguistics
Narrative strategies of aphasic and normal speaking subjects
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
Studies on the grammar of aphasics
Agrammatism
Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination
Cited by (36)
Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence regarding their representation and processing
2021, Brain and LanguageCitation Excerpt :The choice of classifiers therefore has a lexico-syntactic nature defined by ambiguous patterns that are flexible to cater for various factors. The major influence of semantic category on classifier assignment has already been attested, with implications that classifiers and nouns undergo similar semantic constraints (Bi et al., 2010; Chen & Wang, 2003), even though the relationship is in many cases opaque (Tzeng, Chen, & Hung, 1991). Nevertheless, even though the use of a classifier preceding a noun depends to a great extent on semantic properties, it is the noun itself in the context that has a dominant effect on the choice of classifiers (Shao, 1993).
Classifiers in non-European languages and semantic impairments in western neurological patients have a common cognitive structure
2020, LinguaCitation Excerpt :Another limitation we face is that all of the neuropsychological studies have taken place within the academic and medical systems of Western societies (Europe and North America), while neuropsychological data from classifier language speaking populations that could have provided complementary information on the distribution of categories in semantic deficits are still lacking. Nevertheless, a few studies on language impairments like aphasia (Thai: Gandour et al., 1984, 1985; Chinese: Tzeng et al., 1991) constitute an exception from the general situation that studies on neuropsychological data from linguistic societies where the target classifiers are present (e.g., for animate things) is lacking. We are aware of but did not include these aphasia studies since they followed testing procedures different from the main stock of category-specific impaired patients.
Lesion-aphasia discordance in acute stroke among Bengali-speaking patients: Frequency, pattern, and effect on aphasia recovery
2019, Journal of NeurolinguisticsCitation Excerpt :The study of possible lesion localization for a given aphasic phenotype may also provide clues about the cerebral language representation in the study population. It has already been established that language representation in the brain may be variable across different languages (e.g., Tzeng, Chen, & Hung, 1991). In a recent article by Bohra et al. (2015), it was observed that the majority (65%) of the patients did not show any conformity between the location of the brain lesion and the type of aphasia according to ‘traditional localizationist model’.
An elephant needs a head but a horse does not: An ERP study of classifier-noun agreement in Mandarin
2019, Journal of NeurolinguisticsCitation Excerpt :Thus, the purpose of the current study was to examine whether Mandarin classifiers can play a grammatical role in relation to their accompanying nouns. To this end, our study took a different approach in designing classifier-noun pairing: instead of adopting apparent semantic clash, we used two frequently found mistakes in young children and aphasic patients (e.g. Tzeng, Chen, & Hung, 1991; Uchida & Imai, 1999): the omission of classifiers and the inappropriate use of the general classifier “GE” (個). The omission mistake ignores the required presence of a classifier and thus is a clear grammatical violation, while the incongruity in the inappropriate use of GE is not as apparent.
- ☆
This research was supported in part by a grant to Daisy L. Hung and Ovid Tzeng from the CCK Cultural Foundation and the National Science Council of the Republic of China and in part by a grant from PHS-NIDCD No. R01-DC00216-07 to Elizabeth Bates.