Cognitive risk-taking after frontal or temporal lobectomy—II. The synthesis of phonemic and semantic information
References (30)
- et al.
Comprehension and semantic flexibility
J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav.
(1974) Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease
Neuropsychologia
(1968)Stylus-maze performance in patients with frontal-lobe lesions: Effects of signal valency and relationship to verbal and spatial abilities
Neuropsychologia
(1983)Réactions “catastrophiques” et manifestations d'indifférence au cours des atteintes cérébrales
Neuropsychologia
(1969)- et al.
Design fluency: The invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions
Neuropsychologia
(1977) Cognitive risk-taking after frontal or temporal lobectomy—T
Visually-guided maze learning in man: Effects of bilateral hippocampal, bilateral frontal, and unilateral cerebral lesions
Neuropsychologia
(1965)The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour
Neuropsychologia
(1974)Solving deductive-reasoning problems after unilateral temporal lobectomy
Brain Lang.
(1981)- et al.
The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation
Cortex
(1978)
Disturbances of voluntary saccadic eye movement mechanisms following discrete unilateral frontal lobe removals
Risk taking as a function of the situation, the person, and the group
Higher Cortical Functions in Man
Intellectual changes following temporal lobectomy for psychomotor epilepsy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat.
Intellectual effects of temporal-lobe damage in man
Cited by (49)
Executive function in psychopathy: The Tower of London, Brixton Spatial Anticipation and the Hayling Sentence Completion Tests
2014, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :It contains both the components of acquiring the new rule each time the rule changes (and hence not perseverating on the old rule), and also maintaining the rule once acquired (rule adherence). It has been suggested that impulsivity leading to excessively rapid responding could be responsible, in some patients, for the higher number of rule adherence errors (Burgess and Shallice, 1996; Miller and Milner, 1985). Such rule adherence errors had been observed in a small scale, unpublished service evaluation by one of the authors that showed that individuals with impulse control disorders commonly produced rule adherence errors and often verbalised a strategy of trying to ‘beat the system’ by changing their response before the rule changes.
The cognition and neuroscience of relational reasoning
2012, Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :Anatomically, the PFC is in an advantageous position to contribute to reasoning through integrating relational information, as PFC subregions are densely interconnected and it has reciprocal connections with multiple other brain areas (Petrides and Pandya, 1999). Historically, the importance of the PFC has been emphasized in higher cognitive functions such as avoiding impulsivity (Miller, 1985; Miller and Milner, 1985; and Miller, 1992), supervising and scheduling ongoing activities (Shallice and Burgess, 1991; Sirigu et al., 1995), and making decisions (Damasio, 1994; Krawczyk, 2002). Initial studies testing the association between relational reasoning and PFC predominantly employed matrix reasoning problems as experimental stimuli.
The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review
2006, Developmental Review