Skip to main content
Log in

The Relative and Perceived Impact of Irrelevant Speech, Vocal Music and Non-vocal Music on Working Memory

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to retain and manipulate information for brief periods of time is crucial for proficient cognitive functioning but working memory (WM) is susceptible to disruption by irrelevant speech. Music may also be detrimental, but its impact on WM is not clear. This study assessed the effects of vocal music, equivalent instrumental music, and irrelevant speech on WM in order to clarify what aspect of music affects performance and the degree of impairment. To study this, 60 college students completed WM tests (digit span) in the presence of irrelevant speech, vocal music, instrumental (karaoke) versions of the vocal music, and silence. As expected, both speech and vocal music degraded performance. WM performance with instrumental music was better than with vocal music but not significantly different from either silence or speech. Familiarity with song lyrics had little effect on performance. People were poor judges of the degree of memory impairment resulting from various irrelevant sounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austen, J. (1982). Northanger Abbey [book on CD; recorded by Flo Gibson]. Charlotte Hall, MD: Recorded Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of human memory. East Sussex. UK: Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 544–549.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56, 851–864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Salame, P. (1982). The unattended speech effect: Perception or memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 525–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocchini, G., Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., MacPherson, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: Evidence for domain-specific working memory systems. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1086–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colle, H. A. (1980). Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 722–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429–437.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D. R., & Jones, D. M. (1975). The effects of noise and incentive in short-term memory. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 61–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellermeier, W., & Hellbrück, J. (1998). Is level irrelevant in ‘irrelevant speech’? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1406–1414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellermeier, W., & Zimmer, K. (1997). Individual differences in susceptibility to the “irrelevant speech effect.”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2191–2199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilbault, R., Bryant, F., Brockway, J., & Posavac, E. (2004). A meta-analysis of research on hindsight bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, J. R. (1997). Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect? Memory, 5, 423–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hellbrück, J., Namba, S., & Kuwano, S. (1996). Irrelevant background speech and human performance: Is there long-term habituation? Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 17, 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwanaga, M., & Ito, T. (2002). Disturbance effect of music on processing of verbal and spatial memories. Perceptual Motor Skills, 94, 1251–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 550–558.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. D., Baddeley, A., & Andrade, J. (2000). Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: Implications for models of short-term verbal memory. Memory, 8, 145–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, D. C., Neely, C. B., & Wilson, J. R. (1997). Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: The relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 472–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I. (2000). Modelling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 403–423.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D., Baddeley, A. D., & Page, M. P. A. (2004). Retroactive effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall from short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1093–1105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearman, A., & Storandt, M. (2005). Self-discipline and self-consciousness predict subjective memory in older adults. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60B, 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pring, L., & Walker, J. (1994). The effects of unvocalized music on short-term memory. Current Psychology, 13, 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1968). Channel capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Psychology, 19, 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salame, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salame, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1983). Differential effects of noise and speech on short-term memory. In G. Rossi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th international congress on noise as a public health problem, Vol. 2 (pp. 751–758). Milan: Centro Ricerche e Studi Amplifon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salame, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, I. W., Berg, I. J., & Deelman, B. G. (2001). Relations between subjective evaluations of memory and objective memory performance. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 93, 761–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, J., Mohindra, N., & Breen-Lewis, K. (1982). Noise effects in free recall with different orienting tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 479–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas R. Alley.

Additional information

This study was reviewed and approved by the Clemson University Institutional Review Board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alley, T.R., Greene, M.E. The Relative and Perceived Impact of Irrelevant Speech, Vocal Music and Non-vocal Music on Working Memory. Curr Psychol 27, 277–289 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-008-9040-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-008-9040-z

Keywords

Navigation