Skip to main content
Log in

Louis Sullivan, architectural modernism, and the creation of democratic space

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the architectural thought of Louis Sullivan, commonly regarded as the prophet of architectural modernism and the inspiration for the stark Chicago-style skyscraper. Sullivan regarded sociology to he the most urgent of the disciplines as America sought to realize its democratic promise. Animated by certain understandings of self and community that would later define the Chicago School of Sociology, Sullivan saw himself as a kind of social engineer whose architecture would generate democratic space and encourage authentic interaction. Chicago was his laboratory where he fervently called for the escape from the fetters of tradition in order to give form to a democratic present. While the movement he helped inspire reshaped the landscapes where humans labored and lived, few today would confuse the architectural space of a skyscraper, or architectural modernism in general, with the cultivation of authenticity; even fewer would confuse modernism and the sky-scraper with the fulfillment of democracy. Sullivan’s unbridled hopes lor the future have been quelled by postmodern criticisms of the spatial dynamics he espoused. It is argued that this dramatic sea change was a function of a fundamental Haw in Sullivan’s social theory. Following Leo Strauss, it is argued that implicit in Sullivan’s famous dictum“form follows function” was the collapse of the distinction between the real and the ideal. This undermined Sullivan’s voice while framing his sense ol democracy in strictly processional terms. In the end, Sullivan sought an architecture according to which control over circumstance served no higher purpose save control, an architecture whose escape from the past concealed from view the kind of direction that could lend meaning to the control Sullivan was desperate to secure. It is suggested that sociologists are not unlike Sullivan, and that their calls for autonomy and empowerment speak to process and movement rather than ends or destinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Henry. 1961 [11918]. The Education of Henry Adams. Boston: Houghlon, Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Craig (ed.) 1992. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggins, John Patrick. 1994. The Promise of Pragmatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Hugh Dalziel, 1989 [11965]. Culture and Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, Mario Manieri. 1996. Louis Henry Sullivan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlstein, Rochelle Herger. 1986.“Fnigma of Modern Architecture: An Introduction to the Critics.” In Wim de Wit (ed.), Louis Sullivan: The Functkm of Ornament. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1988.“Modern and Postmodern Architecture.” (Pp. 317–329) In John Forester (ed.). Critical Theory and Public Life. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 1985. Consciousness and the Urban Experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxtable, Ada Louise. 1982. The 'Tall Building Artistically Reconsidered. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imber, Jonathan B. 1990.“Introduction,” in Jonathan B. Imber (ed.), The Peeling Intellect, by Philip Rieff. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The Life and Death of Creai American Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, Heinrich. 1987.“The Chicago Multistory as a Design Problem.” In John Zukowsky (ed.), Chicago Architecture: 1872-1922. Munich: Prestel-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C.B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbas to Locke. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Harold and Richard Wade. 1969. Chicago: Growth of a Metropolis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George Herbert. 1934. On Social Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Ross. 1990. American Apocalypse: The Great Fire and the Myth of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Harriet. 1896. fohn Wellborn Root: A study of His Life and Work. New York: Houghton, Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Hugh. 1935. Louis Sullivan: Prophet of Modern Architecture. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, Lewis. 1933. The Brown Decades: A Study of the Arts in America 1865-1895. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M.W. 1982.“Northwestern's Condit Looks Back in Sadness.” Chicago Sun-Times (April 25): 3–4.

  • Rorty, Richard. 1982. “Pragmatism, Relativism, Irrationalism.” In Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972-1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybczynski, Witold. 1995. City Life: Urban Expectations in a New World. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkever, Stephen G. 1990. Finding the Mean. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarfatti-Larson, Magali. 1993. Behind the Postmodern FaÇade. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleier, Merrill. 1983. The Skyscraper in American Art. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carl S. 1984. Chicago and the American Literary Imagination: 1880-1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, George. 1963. The Death of Tragedy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Leo. 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. What Is Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Louis. 1979 [1896].“The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered.” In Isabella Athey (ed.), Louis Sullivan, Kindergarten Chats and Other Writings. New York: George Wittenborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1979 [1918]. Kindergarten Chats and Other Writings. Edited by Isabella Athey. New York: George Wittenborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1956 [1924]. The Autobiography of an Idea. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1945. Democracy in America, Vol. II. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twombly, Robert. 1986. Louis Sullivan: LLis Life and Work. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Thorstein. 1918. The Higher Learning in America. New York: Huebsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Sam Bass, Jr. 1984.“Slums and Skyscrapers: Urban Images, Symbols and Ideology.” In L. Rodwin and R.M. Hollister (eds.), Cities of the Mind. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1946.“Science as a Vocation.” In Hans Gerth and C. Wright Mills (eds.), From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Charles Scribners Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, William H. 1988. City: Rediscovering the Center. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, Carol. 1995. Form Follows Finance. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James R. Abbott.

Additional information

He is currently working on a critique of value-driven and value-neutral sociologies from the perspective of Leo Strauss.

I am indebted to Harold Bershady, Natalie Slavens Abbott, Mark Hutter, Hui Huang, and Tony Sommo for their critical comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbott, J.R. Louis Sullivan, architectural modernism, and the creation of democratic space. Am Soc 31, 62–85 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-000-1005-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-000-1005-0

Keywords

Navigation