Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

WHO disability assessment schedule 2.0 is related to upper and lower extremity disease-specific quality of life

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated whether two disease-specific quality of life instruments (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, DASH and Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, WOMAC) reflect a patient’s perception of general disability using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and determined whether disability components are explained by upper and lower extremity HRQOL.

Methods

We recruited 421 participants, 50 years or older without stroke, cancer, or history of surgery for musculoskeletal disease, who participated in the NAMGARAM Cohort. Upper extremity HRQOL was determined with the DASH score and lower extremity HRQOL with the WOMAC; as a measure of disability, we obtained WHODAS 2.0 component. Multiple regression modeling was used to assess the relative contributions made by upper and lower extremity HRQOL to disability.

Results

When adjusted for covariates, the DASH total score was correlated with getting around (β = 0.217, p < 0.001) and social participation (β = 0.226, p < 0.001), and the WOMAC total score was correlated with getting around (β = 0.363, p < 0.001), life activation (β = 0.363, p < 0.001), and social participation (β = 0.301, p < 0.001). QOL significantly correlated with upper extremity disorders (β = 0.081, p = 0.018) or lower extremity disorders (β = 0.095 p = 0.004).

Conclusion

We found that in a community-based population, perceived activity limitation and social participation were associated with upper and lower extremity HRQOL. Since the WHODAS 2.0 does not target a specific disease (as opposed to DASH and WOMAC), it can be used to compare disabilities caused by different diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bingefors, K., & Isacson, D. (2004). Epidemiology, co-morbidity, and impact on health-related quality of life of self-reported headache and musculoskeletal pain: A gender perspective. European Journal of Pain, 8(5), 435–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lawrence, R. C., Helmick, C. G., Arnett, F. C., Deyo, R. A., Felson, D. T., Giannini, E. H., et al. (1998). Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 41(5), 778–799.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States (BMUS) 3rd Edition (Dated 12.31.16).pdf. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.boneandjointburden.org/docs/The%20Burden%20of%20Musculoskeletal%20Diseases%20in%20the%20United%20States%20%28BMUS%29%203rd%20Edition%20%28Dated%2012.31.16%29.pdf.

  4. Dieppe, P. A. (2005). Relationship between symptoms and structural change in osteoarthritis: What are the important targets for therapy? The Journal of Rheumatology, 32(6), 1147–1149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Furner, S. E., Hootman, J. M., Helmick, C. G., Bolen, J., & Zack, M. M. (2011). Health-related quality of life of US adults with arthritis: Analysis of data from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2003, 2005, and 2007. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(6), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber, G., Zacherl, M., Giessauf, C., Glehr, M., Fuerst, F., Liebmann, W., et al. (2010). Quality of life after volar plate fixation of articular fractures of the distal part of the radius. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 92(5), 1170–1178. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Menz, H. B., Roddy, E., Thomas, E., & Croft, P. R. (2011). Impact of hallux valgus severity on general and foot-specific health-related quality of life. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(3), 396–404.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ostendorf, M., van Stel, H. F., Buskens, E., Schrijvers, A. J. P., Marting, L. N., Verbout, A. J., et al. (2004). Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 86(6), 801–808.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. SooHoo, N. F., McDonald, A. P., Seiler, J. G., & McGillivary, G. R. (2002). Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 27(3), 537–541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bae, S. C., Lee, H. S., Yun, H. R., Kim, T.-H., Yoo, D.-H., & Kim, S. Y. (2001). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) and Lequesne Osteoarthritis Indices for Clinical Research. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 9(8), 746–750. https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.2001.0471.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim, J. Y., Lee, H. Y., Song, J. H., Kang, J. W., & Lee, J. Y. (2005). Evaluation of the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the Korean version of the DASH. The Journal of the Korean Society for Surgery of the Hand, 10(4), 192–198.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kutlay, Ş, Küçükdeveci, A. A., Elhan, A. H., Öztuna, D., Koç, N., & Tennant, A. (2011). Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis. Rheumatology International, 31(3), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1306-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, J. M., Stewart, R., Glozier, N., Prince, M., Kim, S. W., Yang, S. J., et al. (2005). Physical health, depression and cognitive function as correlates of disability in an older Korean population. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 160–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Silva, C., Coleta, I., Silva, A. G., Amaro, A., Alvarelhao, J., Queiros, A., et al. (2013). Adaptacao e validacao do WHODAS 2.0 em utentes com dor musculoesqueletica. Revista de Saúde Pública, 47(4), 752–758. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng, Q. L., Tian, Q., Hao, C., Gu, J., Lucas-Carrasco, R., Tao, J. T., et al. (2014). The role of quality of care and attitude towards disability in the relationship between severity of disability and quality of life: Findings from a cross-sectional survey among people with physical disability in China. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Roux, C. H., Guillemin, F., Boini, S., Longuetaud, F., Arnault, N., Hercberg, S., et al. (2005). Impact of musculoskeletal disorders on quality of life: An inception cohort study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 64(4), 606–611. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.020784.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuperus, N., Vlieland, T. P., Mahler, E. A., Kersten, C. C., Hoogeboom, T. J., & van den Ende, C. H. (2015). The clinical burden of generalized osteoarthritis represented by self-reported health-related quality of life and activity limitations: A cross-sectional study. Rheumatology International, 35(5), 871–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-3149-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwok, W. Y., Vlieland, V., Rosendaal, F. R., Huizinga, T. W., & Kloppenburg, M. (2011). Limitations in daily activities are the major determinant of reduced health-related quality of life in patients with hand osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 70(2), 334–336. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.133603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a grant of the Center for Farmer’s Safety and Health, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ki Soo Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoo, JI., Park, JS., Kim, RB. et al. WHO disability assessment schedule 2.0 is related to upper and lower extremity disease-specific quality of life. Qual Life Res 27, 2243–2250 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1869-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1869-5

Keywords

Navigation