Abstract
The definition of the fundamental quantity, the chemical potential, is badly confused in the literature: there are at least three distinct definitions in various books and papers. While they all give the same result in the thermodynamic limit, major differences between them can occur for finite systems, in anomalous cases even for finite systems as large as a cm3. We resolve the situation by arguing that the chemical potential defined as the symbol μ conventionally appearing in the grand canonical density operator is the uniquely correct definition valid for all finite systems, the grand canonical ensemble being the only one of the various ensembles usually discussed (microcanonical, canonical, Gibbs, grand canonical) that is appropriate for statistical thermodynamics, whenever the chemical potential is physically relevant. The zero–temperature limit of this μ was derived by Perdew et al. for finite systems involving electrons, generally allowing for electron–electron interactions; we extend this derivation and, for semiconductors, we also consider the zero–T limit taken after the thermodynamic limit. The enormous finite size corrections (in macroscopic samples, e.g. 1 cm3) for one rather common definition of the c.p., found recently by Shegelski within the standard effective mass model of an ideal intrinsic semiconductor, are discussed. Also, two very–small–system examples are given, including a quantum dot.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. R. A. Shegelski, Solid State Commun. 58: 351 (1986).
M. R.A. Shegelski, Am. J. of Phys. 72: 676 (2004).
But later in his papers these quantities may be calculated either in the canonical or in the grand canonical ensemble.
C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1971).
N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics, Saunders College, Philadelphia (1976).
This was called an ideal intrinsic semiconductor [1]; it is the usual textbook model where noninteracting electrons move in a periodic potential, treated by periodic boundary conditions (there are neither impurities nor surface states).
J. L. Lebowitz and E. H. Lieb, Phys. Rev. Lett 22: 631 (1969).
The condition T > 0 must be understood: the TL of φ can have a discontinuity at T = 0, as in the semiconductor model just discussed. I.e., φ (and ψ of ((3))) can depend on the order in which the TL and the limit T→0 are taken.
H. B. Callen, Thermodynamics, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1960).
P. T. Landsberg and D. C.Browne, Solid State Commun. 62: 207 (1987).
C. Kittel and H. Kroemer, Thermal Physics, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York (1980).
Fetter, A. L. and Walecka, J. D. (1971) Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York-London.
T. L. Hill, Thermodynamics of Small Systems, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York (1964). Chap.15.
P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of condensed matter physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1995).
R. Baierlein, Am. J. Phys. 69: 423 (2001).
J. P. Perdew, R. G. Parr, M. Levy, J. L. Balduz, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49: 1691 (1982). Regarding Eq. (10) of this paper, one should understand that the cases N = Z±1 are outside the stated allowed range (and are therefore incorrect for general Z). The result for N = Z is correct, and corresponds to (5), (7), and the N = N 0 case of (32), present paper.
J. P. Perdew, in Density-functional methods in Physics, edited by R. M. Dreizler and J. da Providencia, Plenum Press, New York, 1985. p. 265.
Non-integral average values of the number of particles were also considered in [16, 17].
T. A. Kaplan, Phys. Rev. A 7: 812 (1973).
Erwin Schrödinger, Statistical Thermodynamics, Cambridge University Press (1952).
R. Parr, R. A. Donnelly, M. Levy and W. E. Palke, J. Chem. Phys. 68: 3801 (1978).
R. S. Mulliken, J. of Chem. Phys. 2: 782 (1934); ibid. 3, 573 (1935).
E. P. Gyftopoulos and G. N. Hatsopoulos, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 60: 786 (1968). This work states that (5) follows from (7), but doesn't mention a convexity requirement (the result does not follow if (24) is replaced by a concavity condition).
L. Pauling, The nature of the chemical bond, Cornell University Press, New York, (1960).
R. C. Tolman, The Principles of Statistical Mechanics, Oxford University Press, (1938), § 140 (b).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, Statistical Physics, Chap.XV, Pergamon Press, New York (1969).
Magnetic properties of systems of localized spins are examples where the chemical potential may not be physically relevant.
Shegelski [1] has argued that the canonical ensemble is most appropriate for a semiconductor, since it has a fixed number of electrons. I fault this argument by noting that, physically, fluctuations in the number of electrons will occur in semiconductors as well as in metals. This is particularly true for the situation where the semiconductor is put in contact with a piece of metal in order to consider electrical current. Furthermore, these (relative) fluctuations for the grand canonical ensemble within the noninteracting effective mass model can be seen to be negligible for a macroscopic semiconductor.
For discussion of the use of the canonical and grand canonical ensembles in an example even where the average number of particles is fixed, see D. Cabib and T. A. Kaplan, Phys. Rev. B 7: 2199 (1973). Erratum: the + in the line just below eq. (4) should be -.
The formal generalization of (19) and (18) to a multi-component system is straightforward. One has N i particles of type i, \(\mu \hat{N}\) in (13) is replaced by \(\sum \mu_i \hat{N}_i\), (18) is replaced by \(\partial\mathcal{F}/\partial\mathcal{N}_i=\mu_i, \mathcal{N}_i\) is the expectation value of N i , and the derivative is taken holding the other \(\mathcal{N}_j\) constant.
S. R. De Groot, Thermodynamics of irreversible processes, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1951).
F. J. Blatt, Physics of electronic conduction in solids, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1968).
D. K. Ferry, and R. O. Grondin, Physics of submicron devices, Plenum Press, New York and London (1991).
C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions, John Wiley and Sons., New York, Chapter IV (1992).
S. Tarucha, in Mesoscopic Physics and Electronics, T. Ando, Y. Arakawa, K. Furuya, S. Komiyama, and H. Nakashina (eds), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Chapter 2.4. (1998).
R. C. Ashoori, Nature 379: 413 (1996).
R. C. Ashoori, H.L. Stormer, J. S. Weiner, L. N. Pfeiffer, S.J. Pearton, K.W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68: 3088 (1992).
X. Hu and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. A 61: 062301 (2000).
J. Schliemann, D. Loss, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 63: 085311 (2001).
T. A. Kaplan and C. Piermarocchi, Phys. Rev. B 70: 161311(R) (2004).
M. A. Kastner, Physics Today 46: 24 (1993); Rev. Mod. Phys. 64: 849 (1992).
L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. G. Austing, S. Tarucha, Rep. Prog. Phys. 64: 701 (2001).
S. Tessmer, priv. comm.
There is another source of peak width in addition to the thermal effect considered here, namely that due to the hopping of electrons between the levels of the dot and the overlapping continuum of the leads. Under certain conditions the thermal broadening can be the dominant effect. See [41].
O. Steffens, U. Rössler, M. Suhrke, Europhys. Lett. 42: 529 (1998).
For a more realistic but still simple description of a quantum dot, see Kastner's Physics Today article [41].
E. H. Lieb, Phys. Rev. A 29: 3018 (1984).
E. H. Lieb, in (eds) R. M. Dreizler and J. da Providencia, Density-functional methods in Physics, Plenum Press, New York, 1985. p. 11.
J. F. Harrison, private communication.
M. E. Raikh, L. I. Glazman, L. E. Zhukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77: 1354 (1996).
This is equivalent to the theorem of reference [10] for NEM's.
This disagrees with the condition given in [16] for the dominance of these terms.
G. Zhislin, Trudy Moskov Mat. Obsc. 9: 81 (1960); T. A. Kaplan and W. H. Kleiner, Phys. Rev. 156:1 (1967).
N. B. Hannay, in Semiconductors, edited by N. B. Hannay, Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York (1959), p.31.
S. Wolfram (1991, reprinted in 1993 with corrections). Mathematica, Addison-Wesley, New York.
N. G. De Bruijn, Asymptotic Methods in Analysis, Section 2.4., Dover Publications, New York (1981).
These temperatures are high enough to justify the replacement of the sums by integrals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, T.A. The Chemical Potential. J Stat Phys 122, 1237–1260 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-8067-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-8067-x