Skip to main content
Log in

Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonpublic participation within an online community, often called lurking, occurs when an individual joins a community, but does not post. This study examines the nature of lurking, why people lurk and the differences in attitudes between lurkers and posters. The results indicate significant differences between people who lurk and those who post in an online community.

We conclude that when people lurk they are observing, which in no way is a negative behavior. This introverted or passive behavior affects lurkers' attitudes about the benefits of the community, their expectations, and opinions of themselves and others who lurk. In general lurkers are less optimistic and less positive than those who post.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nonnecke, B. (2000). Lurking in email-based discussion lists. Unpublished Ph.D., South Bank University, London.

  2. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2000). Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Paper presented at the ACM CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague.

  3. Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mason, B., & Dicks, B. (1999). The digital ethnographer. Retrieved March 15, 2004, from http://www.socio.demon.co.uk/magazine/6/dicksmason.html

  5. Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2004). Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2).

  6. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2000). Persistence and lurkers: A pilot study. Paper presented at the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii.

  7. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurk. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston.

  8. Rafaeli, S., Ravid, G., & Soroka, V. (2004). De-lurking in virtual communities: A social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Science–2004, Big Island, Hawai‘i.

  9. Millen, D.R. (2000). Audience maps: Visualizing listeners (lurkers) in a shared conversation space. Paper presented at the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii.

  10. Takahashi, M., Fujimoto, M., & Yamasaki, N. (2003). The active lurker: Influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment. Paper presented at the Group 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, Florida.

  11. Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability and community dynamics in an online health community. Accepted by Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction (TOCHI).

  13. Abras, C. (2003). Determining success in online education and health communities. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Baltimore County Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21250.

  14. Preece, J., Abras, C., & Maloney-Krichmar, D. (2004). Designing and evaluating online communities: Research speaks to emerging practice. International Journal of Web-based Communities, 1(1), 2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Katz, J. (1998). Luring the Lurkers. Retrieved March 15, 2004, from http://slashdot.org/features/98/12/28/1745252.shtml

  16. Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and web-based survey: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pew. (2002). PewTrack2000Codebook.doc. Retrieved March 14, 2004, from http://www.pewinternet.org/datasets/dataset.asp?id=10

  18. Parks, R.M., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4).

  19. Turner, J.W., Grube, J.A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communications, 231–251.

  20. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (1999). Shedding light on lurkers in online communities. Paper presented at the Ethnographic Studies in Real and Virtual Environments: Inhabited Information Spaces and Connected Communities, Edinburgh.

  21. Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top 5 reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Special Issue of Computers in Human Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 20(2).

  22. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pew. (2003). The ever-shifting internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. Retrieved October 8, 2004 from http://207.21.232.103/pdfs/PIP_Shifting_Net_Pop_Report.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blair Nonnecke.

Additional information

Blair Nonnecke is a usability professional and academic with a particular interest in user-centred design and online communities. Blair is an Associate Professor at the University of Guelph where he studies participation in online communities and the usability of in-vehicle navigation devices. His recent research focuses on three areas: survey methods for hard to reach participants, the role participation plays in online learning environments, and factors leading to participation in communities of practice.

Dorine Andrews D.C.D. As a specialist in communications design, Dr. Andrews' research and publications focus on both online communities and the implementation of major technology change in organizations. She has taught at Georgetown University's Communications, Culture and Technology program and at the University of Baltimore's School for Interaction Design and Information Architecture. She is now a principal change consultant for RWD Technologies, Inc. headquartered in Baltimore, MD. She can be reached via e-mail at dandrews@rwd.com

Jennifer Preece is Professor and Dean of the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland, USA. Her research and teaching interests focus on human-computer interaction, online communities and social computing. She has authored many papers and books on these topics. Her two most recent books are: Online Communites: “Designing usability, supporting sociability”, and a coauthroed book with Helen Sharp and Yvonne Rogers entiled “Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction”. Both books are published by John Wiley & Sons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D. & Preece, J. Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electron Commerce Res 6, 7–20 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5985-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5985-x

Keywords

Navigation