Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison Between Sodium Alginate and Magaldrate Anhydrous in the Treatment of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to compare effects of sodium alginate and the antacid magaldrate anhydrous in adults with gastroesophageal reflux (GOR) symptoms.

Patients with heartburn and/or acid regurgitation for at least 3 days in the week before the study started (n=203) were randomized to receive a single dose of sodium alginate or magaldrate anhydrous at the onset of symptoms during a 3-day run-in period. Patients with symptoms during the run-in (n=191) were rerandomized to receive a 14-day treatment with either drug given as four daily doses. A speed of action ≤30 min was significantly more frequent among patients in the alginate group (49.4% vs. 40.4%; P=0.0074). A trend toward a more prolonged duration of action (median: 16.5 vs. 12.7 hr) and a greater sum of the symptom intensity difference (median: 40.0 vs. 31.0) was observed in the sodium alginate group. Total disappearance of symptoms was reported in 81.6% and 73.9% of patients in the sodium alginate group and magaldrate group, respectively. We conclude that sodium alginate was faster than magaldrate in relieving GRO symptoms and showed a tendency toward a more prolonged duration of action and a higher level of efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dean BB, Crawley JA, Schmitt CM, Wong J, Ofman JJ (2003) The burden of illness of gastroesophageal reflux disease: impact on work productivity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:1309–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Joish VN, Donaldson G, Stockdale W, Oderda GM, Crawley J, Sasane R, Joshua-Gotlib S, Brixner DI (2005) The economic impact of GERD and PUD: examination of direct and indirect costs using a large integrated employer claims database. Curr Med Res Opin 21:535–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Valle C, Broglia F, Pistorio A, Tinelli C, Perego M (1999) Prevalence and impact of symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 44:1848–1852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Niemcryk SJ, Joshua-Gotlib S, Levine DS (2005) Outpatient experience of patients with GERD in the United States: analysis of the 1998–2001 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Dig Dis Sci 50:1904–1908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okamoto K, Iwakiri R, Mori M, Hara M, Oda K, Danjo A, Ootani A, Sakata H, Fujimoto K (2003) Clinical symptoms in endoscopic reflux esophagitis: evaluation in 8031 adult subjects. Dig Dis Sci 48:2237–2241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatfield S (1999) A comparison of the efficacy of the alginate preparation, Gaviscon Advance, with placebo in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Med Res Opin 15:152–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zentilin P, Dulbecco P, Savarino E, Parodi A, Iiritano E, Bilardi C, Reglioni S, Vigneri S, Savarino V (2001) An evaluation of the antireflux properties of sodium alginate by means of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-metry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21:29–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Washington N, Steele RJ, Jackson SJ, Washington C, Bush D (1998) Patterns of food and acid reflux in patients with low-grade oesophagitis—the role of an anti-reflux agent. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 12:53–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mandel KG, Daggy BP, Brodie DA, Jacoby HI (2000) Review article: alginate-raft formulations in the treatment of heartburn and acid reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14:669–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Korman MG, Nicholson L, Chan JG (1990) In-vivo anti-reflux and raft properties of alginates. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 4:615–622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marciani L, Little SL, Snee J, Coleman NS, Tyler DJ, Sykes J, Jolliffe IG, Dettmar PW, Spiller RC, Gowland PA (2002) Echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging of Gaviscon alginate rafts in-vivo. J Pharm Pharmacol 54:1351–1356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampson FC, Farndale A, Strugala V, Sykes J, Jolliffe IG, Dettmar PW (2005) Alginate rafts and their characterisation. Int J Pharm 294:137–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor G, Warren SJ, Kelleway IW, Patel B, Little SL (1997) Gastric residence of Gaviscon Advance and Liquid Gaviscon in healthy volunteers. J Pharm Pharmacol 49(Suppl 4):73 (131)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chevrel B (1980) A comparative crossover study on the treatment of heartburn and epigastric pain: Liquid Gaviscon and a magnesium-aluminium antacid gel. J Int Med Res 8:300–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Juul-Hansen P, Rydning A (2003) Endoscopy-negative reflux disease: What is the value of a proton-pump inhibitor test in everyday clinical practice? Scand J Gastroenterol 38:1200–1203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Numans ME, Lau J, de Wit NJ, Bonis PA (2004) Short-term treatment with proton-pump inhibitors as a test for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test characteristics. Ann Intern Med 140:518–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Orr WC (2004) Sleep and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a wake-up call. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 4(Suppl 4):S25–S32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gislason T, Janson C, Vermeire P, Plaschke P, Bjornsson E, Gislason D, Boman G (2002) Respiratory symptoms and nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study of young adults in three European countries. Chest 121:158–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Farup C, Kleinman L, Sloan S, Ganoczy D, Chee E, Lee C, Revicki D (2001) The impact of nocturnal symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life. Arch Intern Med 161:45–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Novartis Consumer Health SpA, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Savarino.

Appendix

Appendix

Study coordinator V. Savarino (Genova).

Investigators G. Bernasconi (Gallarate, VA), E. Corazziari E (Roma), R. Cuomo (Napoli), R. De Franchis (Milano), M. Del Piano (Novara), A. D’Odorico (Padova), O. Ferraù (Messina), A. Franzè (Parma), G. Gasbarrini (Roma), S. Marchi (Pisa), A. Pera (Torino), M. Perego (Pavia), P. Ravelli (Seriate, BG), A. Russo (Catania), V. Stanghellini (Bologna), V. Stoppino (Foggia), C. Surrenti (Firenze), F. Tosato (Roma), P. Usai (Cagliari), F. Valente (Taormina, ME), S. Vigneri (Palermo), M. Zilli (Udine), and G. Zoli (Cento, FE).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giannini, E.G., Zentilin, P., Dulbecco, P. et al. A Comparison Between Sodium Alginate and Magaldrate Anhydrous in the Treatment of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms. Dig Dis Sci 51, 1904–1909 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9284-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9284-0

Keywords

Navigation