Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The extreme arrogance of anti-aging medicine

  • Opinion
  • Published:
Biogerontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The anti-aging medicine movement proposes to alter the human body in order to achieve extreme longevity. To do this it has to reverse or by-pass the multiple causes of human aging. These include a large number of age-associated pathologies, each of which is being studied in great detail in research laboratories around the world. The protagonists of anti-aging medicine claim that it will be far more successful than the combined efforts of the innumerable scientists carrying out this research. Aging has an extremely long evolutionary history, and the anatomical structure and physiology of animals is directly related to their finite lifespan. The anti-aging movement proposes in a few decades to reverse what has been the result of millions of years of evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austad SN (1997) Why we age. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Grey ADNJ (2004) Interview with C. Deavans. BBC News Online Specials

  • de Grey ADNJ (2006) Extrapoholics anonymous: why demographers’ rejections of a huge rise in cohort life expectancy in this century are overconfident. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1067:83–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finch CE (1990) Longevity, senescence and the genome. University Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayflick L (1994, 1996) How and why we age. Ballantine Books, New York

  • Holliday R (1995) Understanding aging. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood TBL, Holliday R (1979) The evolution of aging and longevity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 205:532–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood TBL, Austad SN (2000) Why do we age? Nature 408:233–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klatz RM (1996) Advances in anti-aging medicine. Larchmont, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshansky SJ, Hayflick L, Carnes BA et al (2002) No truth to the fountain of youth. Position statement on human aging. Sci Am 286:78–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olshansky SJ, Hayflick L, Perls TT (eds) (2004) Anti-aging medicine: the hype and the reality. J Gerontol Biol Sci 59A:515–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner H et al (2005) Science fact and the SENS agenda. EMBO Rep 6:1006–1008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, Australia

    Robin Holliday

  2. 12 Roma Court, West Pennant Hills, NSW, 2125, Australia

    Robin Holliday

Authors
  1. Robin Holliday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Holliday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holliday, R. The extreme arrogance of anti-aging medicine. Biogerontology 10, 223–228 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-008-9170-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-008-9170-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation