Skip to main content
Log in

Dissecting “Gaydar”: Accuracy and the Role of Masculinity–Femininity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Gaydar” is the ability to distinguish homosexual and heterosexual people using indirect cues. We investigated the accuracy of gaydar and the nature of “gaydar signals” conveying information about sexual orientation. Homosexual people tend to be more sex atypical than heterosexual people in some behaviors, feelings, and interests. We hypothesized that indicators of sex atypicality might function as gaydar signals. In Study 1, raters judged targets’ sexual orientation from pictures, brief videos, and sound recordings. Sexual orientation was assessed with high, though imperfect, accuracy. In Study 2, different raters judged targets’ sex atypicality from the same stimuli. Ratings of sexual orientation from Study 1 corresponded highly with targets’ self-reports of sex atypicality and with observer ratings of sex atypicality from Study 2. Thus, brief samples of sex-atypical behavior may function as effective gaydar signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. (1999). Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 538–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aube, J., & Koestner, R. (1992). Gender characteristics and adjustment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 485–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. M. (2003). The man who would be queen: The science of gender-bending and transsexualism. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. M., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 524–536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. M., Finkel, E., Blackwelder, K., & Bailey, T. (1995). Masculinity, femininity, and sexual orientation. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Bailey, J. M., Kim, P. Y., Hills, A., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 960–973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation: A conceptual analysis and quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 31, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., Nelson, R. O., Steele, D. L., Meeler, M. E., & Mills, J. R. (1979). Sex role motor behavior: A behavioral checklist. Behavioral Assessment, 1, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, A., & Bakeman, R. (2000). Boyhood gender nonconformity: Reported parental behavior and the development of narcissistic issues. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy, 4, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981). Sexual preference: Its development in men and women. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, G., Hank, L., Rauzi, T., & Simkins, L. (1987). Detection of sexual orientation by heterosexuals and homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 13, 83–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D., & McCloskey, L. A. (1983). Peers and the maintenance of sex-typed behavior: The development of children’s conceptions of cross-gender behavior in their peers. Social Cognition, 2, 294–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity–femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagot, B. I. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagot, B. I. (1985). Beyond the reinforcement principle: Another step toward understanding sex role development. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1097–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., & Blanchard, R. (1983). Is the distant relationship of fathers and homosexual sons related to the sons’ erotic preference for male partners, or to the sons’ atypical gender identity, or to both? Journal of Homosexuality, 9, 7–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudio, R. (1994). Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech, 69, 30–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Osborne, R. E. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 940–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J. (1983a). Defeminization and adult psychological well-being among male homosexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12, 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J. (1983b). Parasuicide, gender, and gender deviance. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 24, 350–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. L., Gill, S., Reichman, V., & Tassinary, L. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 321–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landolt, M. A., Bartholomew, K., Saffrey, C., Oram, D., Perlman, D., & Bartholomew, K. (2004). Gender nonconformity, childhood rejection, and adult attachment: A study of gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 117–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laner, M. R. (1978). Media mating II: “Personals” advertisements of lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 4, 41–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laner, M. R., & Kamel, G. L. (1977). Media mating I: Newspaper “personals” ads of homosexual men. Journal of Homosexuality, 3, 149–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linville, S. E. (1998). Acoustic correlates of perceived versus actual sexual orientation in men’s speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 50, 35–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (1991). Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: Reliability, validity, consistency across domains, and relationship to the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1000–1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (1995a). Do sex differences define gender-related individual differences within the sexes? Evidence from three studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 349–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (1995b). Gender-related individual differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the big five and circumplex models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1184–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (1998). The nonverbal display and judgment of extraversion, masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: A lens model analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 80–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2000). Gender-related traits in gay men, lesbian women, and heterosexual men and women: The virtual identity of homosexual–heterosexual diagnosticity and gender diagnosticity. Journal of Personality, 68, 899–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2005a). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2005b). Sexual orientation and personality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 119–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2006, April). Childhood gender nonconformity and adult personality in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Paper presented at the Gender Development Conference, San Francisco, CA.

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. M. (1985). Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: Context and consequences. Ethology & Sociobiology, 6, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. M. (2002). Courtship communication and perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 97–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, C. L. (2004). Gaydar: Eye-gaze as identity recognition among gay men and lesbians. Sexuality & Culture, 8, 60–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J. B., Bent, T., Munson, B., Bradlow, A. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). The influence of sexual orientation on vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1905–1908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, Q., & Wilson, G. D. (2003). Born gay? The psychobiology of human sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1337–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remafedi, G., French, S., Story, M., Resnick, M. D., & Blum, R. (1998). The relationship between suicide risk and sexual orientation: Results of a population-based study. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 57–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., Gygax, L., & Bailey, J. M. (2008). Sexual orientation and childhood gender nonconformity: Evidence from home videos. Developmental Psychology, 44, 46–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saghir, M. T., & Robins, E. (1973). Male and female homosexuality: A comprehensive investigation. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, C. W., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., & Bailey, J. M. (2006). Gender nonconformity and psychological distress in lesbians and gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 685–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. E., & Leaper, C. (2006). Self-perceived gender typicality and the peer context during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, R., Jacobs, G., & Rogers, H. (2003). Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society, 32, 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. (1995). Masculinity and femininity: Defining the undefinable. In P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power, and communication in human relationships (pp. 105–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, D., Sell, L., & Bailey, J. M. (2007). An audible minority: Homosexuality and speech. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Tauber, M. A. (1979). Sex differences in parent–child interaction styles during a free-play session. Child Development, 50, 981–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinrich, J. D., Grant, I., Jacobson, D. L., Robinson, S. R., McCutchan, J. A., & HNRC. (1992). Effects of recalled childhood gender nonconformity on adult genitoerotic role and AIDS exposure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 559–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. D., & Rahman, Q. (2005). Born gay? The psychobiology of sex orientation. London: Peter Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, K. J., Wilson-Smith, D. N., Kurita, J. A., & Stern, A. (1995). Children’s appraisals of sex-typed behavior in their peers. Sex Roles, 33, 703–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerulf Rieger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J.A.W., Gygax, L. et al. Dissecting “Gaydar”: Accuracy and the Role of Masculinity–Femininity. Arch Sex Behav 39, 124–140 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9405-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9405-2

Keywords

Navigation