Skip to main content
Log in

Duration of cats' (Felis catus) working memory for disappearing objects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored the duration of cats' working memory for hidden objects. Twenty-four cats were equally divided into four groups, which differed according to the type of visual cues displayed on and/or around the hiding boxes. During eight sessions, the four groups of cats were trained to locate a desirable object hidden behind one of the four boxes placed in front of them. Then, the cats were tested with retention intervals of 0, 10, 30 and 60 s. Results revealed no significant differences between the groups during training or testing. In testing, the cats' accuracy to locate the hidden object rapidly declined between 0 and 30 s but remained higher than chance with delays of up to 60 s. The analysis of errors also indicated that the cats searched as a function of the proximity of the target box and were not subjected to intertrial proactive interference. This experiment reveals that the duration of cats' working memory for disappearing objects is limited and the visual cues displayed on and/or around the boxes do not help the cats to memorize a hiding position. In discussion, we explore why the duration of cats' working memory for disappearing objects rapidly declined and compare these finding with those from domestic dogs. The irrelevance of visual cues displayed on and around the hiding boxes on cats' retention capacity is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bjork EL, Cummings EM (1984) Infant search errors: stage of concept development or stage of memory development. Mem Cognit 12:1–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss WD (1960) The role of perceptual cues in the delayed reaction. J Comp Physiol Psychol 53:176–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck D (1994) Memory for spatial and local cues: a comparison of a storing and a nonstoring species. Anim Learn Behav 22:119–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Call J (2001) Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 115:159–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Gallistel R (1984) Testing the geometric power of an animal's spatial representation. In: Roitblat HL, Bever TG, Terrace HS (eds) Animal cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 409–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier-Baker E, Davis JM, Suddendorf T (2004) Do dogs (Canis familiaris) understand invisible displacement? J Comp Psychol 118:421–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan EA (1923) An experiment testing the ability of a cat to make delayed response and to maintain a given response toward a varying stimulus. J Comp Physiol Psychol 53:524–531

    Google Scholar 

  • De Blois ST, Novak MA (1994) Object permanence in Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) J Comp Psychol 108:318–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Blois ST, Novak MA, Bond M (1998) Object permanence in Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciurus). J Comp Psychol 112:137–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodwell PD, Wilkinson FE, Grünau MWV (1983) Pattern recognition in kittens: Performance on lie patterns. Perception 12:393–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doré FY (1986) Object permanence in adult cats (Felis catus). J Comp Psychol 100:340–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doré FY, Fiset S, Goulet S, Dumas M-C, Gagnon S (1996) Search behavior in cats and dogs: interspecific differences in working memory and spatial cognition. Anim Learn Behav 24: 142–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas C, Doré FY (1989) Cognitive development of kittens: a cross-sectional study of object permanence. J Comp Psychol 103:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas C, Doré FY (1991) Cognitive development in kittens (Felis catus): an observational study of object permanence and sensorimotor intelligence. J Comp Psychol 105:357–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edhouse WV, White KG (1988) Sources of proactive interference in animal memory. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:56–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiset S, Doré FY (1996) Spatial encoding in domestic cats (Felis catus). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22:420–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fiset S, Gagnon S, Beaulieu C (2000) Spatial encoding of hidden objects in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 114:315–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fiset S, Beaulieu C, Landry F (2003) Duration of dogs' (Canis familiaris) working memory in search for disappearing objects. Anim Cogn 6:1–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher HJ (1965) The delayed response problem. In: Schrier AM, Harlow HF, Stollnitz F (eds) Behavior of nonhuman primates, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 129–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon S, Doré FY (1992) Search Behavior in various breeds of adult dogs (Canis familiaris): object permanence and olfactory cues. J Comp Psychol 106:58–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon S, Doré FY (1993) Search behavior of dogs (Canis familiaris) in invisible displacement problems. Anim Learn Behav 21:246–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon S, Doré FY (1994) Cross-sectional study of object permanence in domestic puppies (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol, 108:220–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet S, Doré FY, Rousseau R (1989) Permanence de l'objet et interférence proactive de la durée de l'intervalle de rétention chez le chat domestique (Felis catus) [object permanence and proactive interference of the duration of the retention interval in domestic cats (Felis catus)]. In: 12th Annual Meeting of the Société Québécoise pour la Recherche en Psychologie, Ottawa

  • Goulet S, Doré FY, Rousseau R (1994) Object permanence and working memory in cats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 20:347–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouteux S, Vauclair J, Thinus-Blanc C (1999) Reaction to spatial novelty and exploratory strategies in baboons. Anim Learn Behav 27:323–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant DS (1981) Intertrial interference in rat short-term memory. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 7:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber HE, Girgus JS, Banuazizi A (1971) The development of object permanence in the cat. Dev Psychol 4:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton RR, Shettleworth SJ, Westwood RP (1998) Proactive interference, recency, and associative strength: comparisons of black-capped chickadees and dark-eyes juncos. Anim Learn Behav 26:475–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Head E, Mehta R, Hartley J, Kameka M, Cummings BJ, Cotman CW, Ruehl WW, Milgram NW (1995) Spatial learning and memory as a function of age in the dog. Behav Neurosci 109:851–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermer L, Spelke E (1996) Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation. Cognition 61:195–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu M, Bergeron G (1981) Piagetian assessment of cognitive development in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). In: Chiarelli AB, Corrucine RS (eds) Primate behavior and sociobiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 142–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu M, Bouchard MA, Granger L, Herscovitch J (1976) Piagetian object permanence in Cebus capucinus, Lagothrica flavicauda and Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 24:585–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCord F (1939) The delayed reaction and memory in rats: I. Length of delay. J Comp Psychol. 27:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DR, Harlow H (1952) Effects of multiple variables on delayed response performance by monkeys. J Gen Psychol 81:53–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers WJ, McQuiston MD, Miles RC (1962) Delayed-response and learning-set performance of cats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 55:515–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michels RM, Brown DR (1959) The delayed-response performance of racoons. J Comp Physiol Psychol 52:737–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram NW, Head E, Weiner E, Thomas E (1994) Cognitive functions and aging in the dog: acquisition of nonspatial visual tasks. Behav Neurosci 108:57–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Natale F, Antinucci F, Spinozzi G, Poti P (1986) Stage 6 object concept in nonhuman primate cognition: a comparison between gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata). J Comp Psychol 100:335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neiworth JJ, Steinmark E, Basile BM, Wonders R, Steely F, DeHart C (2003) A test of object permanence in a new-world monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Anim Cogn 6:27–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen HW, Harrison R (1941) Visual and positional cues in the delayed responses of chimpanzees. J Comp Psychol 31:437– 445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker ST (1977) Piaget's sensorimotor series in an infant macaque: a model for comparative unstereotyped behavior and intelligence in human and nonhuman primates. In: Chevalier-Skolnikoff S, Poirier FE (eds) Primate bio-social development: biological, social, and ecological determinants. Garland, New York, pp 43–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2002) The value of the Piagetian framework for comparative cognitive studies. Anim Cogn 5:177–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1937) La construction du réel chez l'enfant. Delachaux and Niestlé, Neuchâtel

  • Redshaw M (1978) Cognitive development in human and gorilla infants. J Hum Evol 7:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Roberts WA (1980) Distribution of trials and intertrial retention in delayed matching to sample with pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 6:217–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thinus-Blanc C, Poucet B, Chapuis N (1982) Object permanence in cat: analysis in locomotor space. Behav Process 7:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triana E, Pasnak R (1981) Object permanence in cats and dogs. Anim Learn Behav 9:135–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough JU (1917) The delayed reaction with sound and light in cats. J Anim Behav 7:87–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G, Regolin L, Rigoli M, Zanforlin M (1998) Delayed search for a concealed imprinted object in the domestic chick. Anim Cogn 1:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Pasti G (1990) Geometric modules in animals' spatial representation: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). J Comp Psychol 104:248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood S, Moriarty KM, Gardner BT, Gardner RA (1980) Object permanence in child and chimpanzee. Anim Learn Behav 8:3–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an operating research grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The experiments received approval from the Comité de protection des animaux de laboratoire de l'Université Laval, which is responsible for the application and enforcement of rules of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvain Fiset.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiset, S., Doré, F.Y. Duration of cats' (Felis catus) working memory for disappearing objects. Anim Cogn 9, 62–70 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-005-0005-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-005-0005-4

Keywords

Navigation