Skip to main content
Log in

Responses of Emperor Penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) to encounters with ecotourists while commuting to and from their breeding colony

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) were studied at the Snow Hill breeding colony in November 2006 to determine the effect of people on penguins traveling between the colony and the sea to forage. We tested the null hypothesis that the presence and number of people had no effect on the trajectory of movement or the number and duration of pauses. The distances at which penguins noticed people (mean 35.6 m), changed direction (mean 22.8 m), and the number and duration of pauses increased significantly with increases in the number of tourists in their path, which explained more than 50% of the variance. Undisturbed penguins usually tobogganed on their ventral surface over the ice. When penguins noticed people, they usually stood up and often called. In 10 min observation periods, penguins traveling more than 200 m from people paused an average of <1 min vs. 3.8 min for those passing near people, increasing the energetic cost of commuting. After passing people, penguins rarely stopped. Penguins response to people varied by time of day; later in the day they responded less quickly, changed directions when closer to people, stopped for less time, and passed by people closer than they did earlier in the day. We suggest that the effect of ecotourists on traveling penguins can be partly mitigated by having people walk in small, tight-knit groups, by having people stop moving whenever traveling penguins are within about 25 m to allow the penguins to choose the direction of their passage, and by keeping the visitor pathway separate from the penguin paths insofar as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGAD (2003) Antarctic specialty protection areas: Taylor Rookery ASPA No. 101 management plan. Australian Government Antarctic Division, Canberra. http://www.aad.gov.au/default.asp?casid=3365 [accessed 25 Apr 2007]

  • Agardy MT (1993) Accommdating ecotourism in multiple use planning of coastal and marine protected areas. Ocean Coast Manage 20:219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beale CM, Monaghan P (2004) Human disturbance: people as predation-free predators? J Appl Ecol 41:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma FD, Clark JA, Hilgarth N (2001) Seabird conservation. In: Schreiber EA, Burger J (eds) Biology of marine birds. CRC, New York, pp 559–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (2002) Tourism and ecosystems. In: Douglas I (ed) Encyclopedia of global environmental change. Wiley, Lde, Chichester, UK, pp 587–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M (1981) Discrimination of the threat of direct versus tangential approach to the nest by incubating herring and great black-backed gulls. J Comp Physiol Psychol 95:676–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M (1991) Human distance and birds: tolerance and response distances of resident and migrant species in India. Environ Conserv 18:158–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M (1993) Tourism and short-term behavioral responses of nesting masked, red-footed, and blue-footed boobies in the Galapagos. Environ Conserv 20:255–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M (1994) Predation and effects of humans on island nesting seabirds. In: Nettleship DN, Burger J, Gochfeld M (eds) Seabirds on islands: threats, case studies and action plans. BirdLife International Conservation Series No. 1, Cambridge, UK

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M (1998) Effects of ecotourists on bird behaviour at Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Florida. Environ Conserv 25:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M (1999) Role of human disturbance in response behavior of Laysan albatrosses (Diomedea immutabilis). Bird Behav 13:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M (2001) Effect of human presence on foraging behavior of sandhill cranes (Grus Canadensis) in Nebraska. Bird Behav 14:81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M, Niles LJ (1995) Ecotourism and birds in coastal NewJersey: contrasting responses of birds, tourists, and managers. Environ Conserv 22:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns JM, Kooyman GL (2001) Habitat use by Weddell seals and emperor penguins foraging in the Ross Sea. Antarctica Am Zool 41:90–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobley ND, Shears JR (1999) Breeding performance of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) at a colony exposed to high levels of human disturbance. Polar Biol 21:355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J, Oehle EW, Elbin RLE (2000) Guest editorial selecting Antarctic specially protected areas: important bird areas can help. Antarctic Sci 12:129

    Google Scholar 

  • Croxall JP, Prince PA, Hunter I, McInnes SJ, Copestake PG (1984) The seabirds of the Antarctic peninsula, islands of the Scotia Sea, and Antarctic continent between 80oW and 20oW. In: Croxall JP, Evans PGH, Schreiber RW (eds) Status and conservation of the world’s seabirds. Internatl. Council Bird Preservation. Tech. Publ. No. 2, Cambridge, UK

  • Croxall JP, Trathan PN, Murphy EJ (2002) Environmental change and Antarctic seabird populations. Science 297:1510–1514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg U, Mattern T, Seddon PJ, Gorquera GL (2006) Physiological and reproductive consequences of human disturbance in Humboldt penguins: the need for species-specific visitor management. Biol Conserv 133:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SG (1999) Behavioral and hormonal responses of Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) to tourism and nest site visitation. Biol Conserv 90:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giese M (1996) Effects of human activity on Adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success. Biol Conserv 75:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giese M, Riddle M (1999) Disturbance of emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri chicks by helicopters. Polar Biol 22:366–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez LM, Arroyo BE, Margalida A, Sanchez R, Oria J (2006) Effect of human activities on the behavior of breeding Spanish imperial eagles (Aquila adalberti): management implications for the conservation of a threatened species. Anim Conserv 9:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin TM, Kram R (2000) Biomechanics: penguin waddling is not wasteful. Nature 408:929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ, Marcum HA, Harvey HB, Roth JD, Anderson SH (1998) Bird tolerance to human intrusion in Wyoming montane forests. Condor 100:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CM (ed) (2006) Wildlife awareness manual: Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetland Islands, South Orkney Islands. Wildlife Information Publ 1. UK Foreign and Common Wealth Office, Cambridge UK. http://www.era.gs/resources/wam/WAMv3-FINAL-web.pdf [accessed 25 Apr 2007]

  • Hockey PAR, Hallinan J (1981) Effect of human disturbance on the breeding behavior of jackass penguins Spheniscus demersus. S Afr J Wildl Res 11:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes N, Giese M, Kriwoken LK (2005) Testing the minimum approach distance guidelines for incubating Royal penguins Eudyptes schlegeli. Biol Conserv 126:339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes ND, Giese M, Achurch H, Robinson S, Kriwoken LK (2006) Behaviour and breeding success of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua in areas of low and high human activity. Polar Biol 29:399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators) (2004) IAATO overview of Antarctic tourism. Basalt, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • IAATO (2006a) Marine wildlife watching guidelines (whales & dolphins, seals and seabirds). Basalt, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • IAATO (2006b) 1992–2007 Antarctic tourist trends–landed. http://www.polartravel.de/downloads/antarctictouristtrends19922007.pdf [accessed 25 Apr 2007]

  • Klages N (1989) Food and feeding ecology of emperor penguins in the eastern Weddell Sea. Polar Biol 9:385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, DeNeve L, Fargallo JA, Polo V, Manuel S (2004) Factors affecting the escape behaviour of juvenile chinstrap penguins, Pygoscelis antarctica, in response to human disturbance. Polar Biol 27:775–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez I (1992) Family spheniscidae (penguins). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (eds) Handbook of birds of the world. Lynx Ediciones, Barcelona, pp 140–161

  • McClung MR, Seddon PJ, Setiawan AN (2004) Nature-based tourism impacts on yellow-eyed penguins Megadyptes antipodes: does unregulated visitor access affect fledging weight and juvenile survival? Biol Conserv 119:279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller ML (1993) The rise of coastal and marine tourism. Ocean Coast Manage 20:181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser D (2002) Tourism trends: larger ships, more air transport. Australian Antarctic Mag 3:40–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy RC (1936) Emperor penguin. In: Murphy RC (ed) Oceanic birds of South America. American Museum of Natural History, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Otley HM (2005) Nature-0based tourism: experiences at the volunteer point penguin colony in the Falkland Islands. Mar Ornithol 33:181–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinshow B, Fedak MA, Battles DR, Schmidt-Nielsen K (1976) Energy expenditure for thermoregulation and locomotion in emperor penguins. Am J Physiol 231:903–912

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinshow B, Fedak MA, Schmidt-Nielsen K (1977) Terrestrial locomotion in penguins: it costs more to waddle. Science 195:592–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regel J, Putz K (2004) Effect of human disturbance on body temperature and energy expenditure in penguins. Polar Res 40:345–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson G, Williams R, Green K, Robertson L (1994) Diet composition of Emperor penguin chicks Aptenodytes forsteri at two Mawson Coast colonies, Antarctica. Ibis 136:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers JA Jr, Smith HT (2005) Set-back distances to protect nesting bird colonies from human disturbance in Florida. Conserv Biol 9:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1995) SAS manual: statistics. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Carey, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekercioglu CH (2002) Impacts of birdwatching on human and avian communities. Environ Conserv 29:282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber EA, Burger J (2001) Data on life-history characteristics, breeding range, size, and survival of seabird species. In: Schreiber EA, Burger J (eds) Biology of Marine Birds. CRC, New York, pp 665–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Non-parametric statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd FS, Adie S, Splettstoesser JR (2004) First ground visit to the emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri colony at Snow Hill Island, Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Mar Ornithol 32:193–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Villiers Mde, Bause M, Giese M, Fourie A (2006) Hardly hard-hearted: heart rate responses of incubating northern giant petrels (Macronectes halli) to human disturbance on sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Polar Biol 29:717–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BG, Boersma PD, Wingfield JC (2005) Physiological and behavioral differences in Magellanic penguin chicks in undisturbed and tourist-visited locations at a colony. Conserv Biol 19:1571–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BG, Boersma D, Wingfield JC (2006) Habituation of adult Magellanic penguins to human visitation as expressed through behavior and corticosterone secretion. Conserv Biol 20:146–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wienecke BC, Robertson G (1997) Foraging space of emperor penguins Aptenodytes forsteri in Antarctic shelf waters in winter. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 159:249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Woehler EJ (ed) (1993) The distribution and abundance of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic penguins. Scientific Committee Antarctic Research, Cambridge, UK

  • Yorio P, Boersma PD (1992) The effects of human disturbance on Magellanic penguins Spheniscus magellanicus behavior and breeding success. Bird Conserv Int 2:161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorio P, Frere E, Gandini P, Schiavini A (2001) Tourism and recreation at seabird breeding sites in Patagonia, Argentina: current concerns and future prospects. Bird Conserv Int 11:231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer I, Plőtz J, Bornemann H, Ancel A, Hagen W (2006) Foraging ecology of enmperor penguins. Polar Systems POL 4. Alfred-Wegener-Institut fur Polar und Meeresforshung, Bremerhaven, Germany, http://web.awi-bremerhaven.de/Publications/Zim2006a.pdf [accessed 25 Apr 2007]

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Patti and Bert Murray, and the entire staff of the Kapitan Khlebnikov for logistical help during the expedition. Tour ornithologist, Akos Hivekovics and photographer Wayne Lynch provided information about the emperor penguin behavior at other colonies they had visited, and Marc Slattery provided information on emperor penguin responses to visitors at the Cape Crozier and Cape Washington colonies. Tim Griffin and G. Kooyman provided information on penguin locomotion. Our overall protocol for conducting behavioral observations with birds was approved by the Rutgers University Animal Review Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Burger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burger, J., Gochfeld, M. Responses of Emperor Penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) to encounters with ecotourists while commuting to and from their breeding colony. Polar Biol 30, 1303–1313 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-007-0291-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-007-0291-1

Keywords

Navigation