Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Capsule enteroscopy of the small intestine

  • Review
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advent of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in 2000 has dramatically changed the diagnosis and management of many diseases of the small intestine. In this review we discuss the procedure, the various indications and contraindications, adverse effects, and future prospects of VCE. VCE has a significant role in the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal hemorrhage and Crohn’s disease and has the highest diagnostic yield in comparison to other diagnostic modalities. Furthermore, VCE has gained an important role in the management and surveillance of suspected small bowel tumors and in patients with polyposis syndromes. Capsule enteroscopy may have a role in the work-up of symptomatic celiac disease and in the assessment of drug therapeutic efficacy and adverse small bowel effects. Although VCE is relatively non-invasive, it is contraindicated in patients with swallowing disorders, known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, strictures, or fistulas, and in patients with implanted electromedical devices. Other contraindications include pregnancy and children under 10. Capsule retention is the most feared complication of VCE with a frequency of 1%–2%. Risk factors and management of capsule retention are also discussed. It is probable that new indications for VCE will evolve and technological improvements will refine VCE’s diagnostic accuracy and simplify video reviewing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P (2000) Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 455:417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eliakim AR (2006) Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel (PillCam SB). Curr Opin Gastroenterol 22:124–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mergener K, Ponchon T, Gralnek I et al (2007) Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts. Consensus statements for small-bowel capsule endoscopy, 2006/2007. Endoscopy 39:895–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Niv Y (2008) Efficiency of bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy examination: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 14:1313–1317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rockey DC (2006) Gastrointestinal bleeding. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ (eds) Sleisenger & Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management 8th edition. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp. 289–290

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gralnek IM (2005) Obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 128:1424–1430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI et al (2005) Meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 100:2407–2418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Rondonotti E et al (2007) Capsule enteroscopy vs. other diagnostic procedures in diagnosing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a cost-effectiveness study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:535–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang SJ, Haber GB (2004) Capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc Ciln N Am 14:87–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E et al (2004) Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 126:643–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson A, Brydon WG, Brian H et al (1996) Use of whole gut perfusion to investigate gastrointestinal blood loss in patients with iron deficiency anaemia. Gut 38:120–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Apostolopoulos P, Liatsos C, Gralnek IM et al (2006) The role of wireless capsule endoscopy in investigating unexplained iron deficiency anemia after negative endoscopic evaluation of the upper and lower gastro−intestinal tract. Endoscopy 38:1127–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Annibale B, Capurso G, Baccini F et al (2003) Role of small bowel investigation in iron deficiency anaemia after negative endoscopic/histologic evaluation of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Dig Liver Dis 35:784–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sands BE (2006) Crohn's disease. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ (eds) Sleisenger & Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management 8th edition. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp. 2467–2477

    Google Scholar 

  15. Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI et al (2006) A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 101:954–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Tuyl SA, van Noorden JT, Stolk MF et al (2007) Clinical consequences of videocapsule endoscopy in GI bleeding and Crohn's disease. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1164–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A, et al. (2008). Double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy have comparable diagnostic yield in small-bowel disease: A meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. [Mar 19, Epub ahead of print]

  18. Crohn's disease (2006) International conference on capsule endoscopy (ICCE)

  19. Bourreille A, Jarry M, D’Hallins PN et al (2006) Wireless capsule endoscopy versus ileocolonoscopy for the diagnosis of post operative recurrence of Crohn’s disease: a prospective study. Gut 55:978–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maunoury V, Savoye G, Bourreille A et al (2007) Value of capsule endoscopy in patients with indeterminate colitis (inflammatory bowel disease type unclassified). Inflam Bowel Dis 13:152–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hopper AD, Sidhu R, Hurlestone DP et al (2007) Capsule endoscopy: an alternative to duodenal biopsy for the recognition of villous atrophy in coeliac disease? Dig Liv Dis 39:145–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Daum S, Wahnschaffe U, Glasenapp R, et al. (2007) Capsule endoscopy in refractory celiac disease. Endoscopy 39:455–458. (Erratum in: Endoscopy 2007; 39:672)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krauss N, Schuppan D (2006) Monitoring nonresponsive patients who have celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 16:317–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwartz GD, Barkin JS (2007) Small bowel tumors detected by wireless capsule endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 52:1026–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carey EJ, Leighton JA, Heigh RI et al (2007) A single-center experience of 260 consecutive patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 102:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bailey AA, Debinski H, Appleyard M et al (2006) Diagnosis and outcome of small bowel tumors found by capsule endoscopy: a three-center Australian experience. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2237–2243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gay J, Delvaux M (2008) Small bowel endoscopy. Endoscopy 40:140–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Itzkowitz SH, Rochester J (2006) Colonic polyps and polyposis syndromes. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ (eds) Sleisenger & Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management 8th edition. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp. 2741–2743

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schulmann K, Hollerbach S, Kraus K et al (2005) Feasibility and diagnostic utility of video capsule endoscopy for the detection of small bowel polyps in patients with hereditary polyposis syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol 100:27–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong RF, Tuteja AK, Haslem DS et al (2006) Video capsule endoscopy compared with standard endoscopy for the evaluation of small−bowel polyps in persons with familial adenomatous polyposis [with video]. Gastrointest Endosc 64:530–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mata A, Llach J, Castells A et al (2005) A prospective trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy and barium contrast series for small−bowel surveillance in hereditary GI polyposis syndromes. Gastrointest Endosc 61:721–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goldstein JL, Eisen GM, Lewis B et al (2005) The use of capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess the incidence of small bowel lesions with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:133–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maiden L, Thjodleifsson B, Theodors A et al (2005) A quantitative analysis of NSAID-induced small bowel pathology by capsule enteroscopy. Gastroenterol 128:1172–11788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Graham DY, Opekun AR, Willingham FF et al (2005) Visible small intestinal mucosal injury in chronic NSAID users. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yakoub-Agha I, Maunoury V, Wacrenier A et al (2004) Impact of small bowel exploration using video-capsule endoscopy in the management of acute graft versus host disease. Transplantation 15:1697–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ho KK, Joyce AM (2007) Complications of capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 17:169–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cave D, Legnani P, de Franchis R et al (2005) ICCE consensus for capsule retention. Endoscopy 37:1065–1067

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lewis B (2005) How to prevent endoscopic capsule retention. Endoscopy 37:852–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Delvaux M, Soussan EB, Laurent V et al (2005) Clinical evaluation of the use of the M2A patency capsule system before a capsule endoscopy procedure, in patients with known or suspected intestinal stenosis. Endoscopy 37:801–807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Herrerias JM, Leighton JA, Costamagna G et al (2008) Agile patency system eliminates risk of capsule retention in patients with known intestinal strictures who undergo capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 67:902–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Selby W (2005) Complete small-bowel transit in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy: determining factors and improvement with metoclopramide. Gastrointest Endosc 61:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rondonotti E, Herrrerias J, Pennazio M et al (2005) Complications, limitations, and failures of capsule endoscopy: a review of 733 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 62:712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Leighton J, Sharma V, Srivathsan K et al (2004) Safety of capsule endoscopy in patients with pacemakers. Gastrointest Endosc 59:567–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Payeras G, Piqueras J, Moreno J et al (2005) Effects of capsule endoscopy on cardiac pacemakers. Endoscopy 37:1181–1189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Leighton J, Srivathsan K, Carey E et al (2005) Safety of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1728–1731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Eliakim R, Sharma VK, Yassin K et al (2005) A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of PillCam Eso esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:572–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sharma P, Wani S, Rastogi A, et al. (2007) The diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus: a blinded, prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol

  48. Eisen GM, Eliakim R, Zaman A et al (2006) The accuracy of PillCam Eso capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices: a prospective three-center pilot study. Endoscopy 38:31–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. de Franchis R, Eisen GM, Laine L et al (2008) Esophageal capsule endoscopy for screening and surveillance of esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension. Hepatology 47:1595–1603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM et al (2006) Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 38:963–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, 31096, Israel

    Matti Waterman & Rami Eliakim

  2. Bruce Rappaport, Faculty of Medicine, The Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    Rami Eliakim

Authors
  1. Matti Waterman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rami Eliakim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rami Eliakim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waterman, M., Eliakim, R. Capsule enteroscopy of the small intestine. Abdom Imaging 34, 452–458 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9431-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9431-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation