Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Patients’ knowledge of potential pelvic floor changes associated with pregnancy and delivery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physicians cite pelvic floor injury as a major reason for Cesarean section as their personal preferred delivery mode. This study was undertaken to determine whether patients receive information about possible pelvic floor complications of pregnancy/delivery. Day 1 post-partum women completed a 52-item questionnaire assessing information given during routine antenatal care. Pelvic floor and general questions were intermixed. Of the 232 patients, the mean age was 26.9 years, with 59.5% white, 32.8% African-American and 7.7% other. Most (84.5%) had at least grade 12 education. The following percentage of patients reported receiving no information about: Kegel exercises 46.1%; episiotomy 51.3%; urinary incontinence 46.6%; fecal incontinence 80.6%; change in vaginal caliber 72.8%; neuropathy 84.9%. Counseling on all of these issues occurred significantly less frequently than education on general pregnancy topics. Our results suggest that knowledge and instruction of pelvic floor risks is very much lacking and provide us with an impetus to develop educational tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM (1997) Survey of obstetricians’ personal preferences and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 73:1–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Land R, Parry E, Rane A, Wilson D (2001) Personal preferences of obstetricians towards childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:249–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nygaard I, Cruikshank DP (2003) Should all women be offered elective cesarean delivery? Obstet Gynecol 102:217–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer JH Jr (2003) Informed consent, informed refusal, and informed choices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:319–326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G (2002) Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. BMJ 324:639–643

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinlivan JA, Petersen RW, Nichols CN (1999) Patient preference the leading indication for elective caesarean section in public patients – results of a 2-year prospective audit in a teaching hospital. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol 39:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lau TK, Wong SH, Li CY (1996) A study of patients’ acceptance towards vaginal birth after caesarean section. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol 36:155–158

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saisto T, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE, Kononen T, Halmesmaki E (2001) A randomized controlled trial of intervention in fear of childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 98:820–826

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV (1998) Great expectations; a prospective study of women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth. Cheshire, England: Books for midwives Practice 114–115

  10. Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S (2003) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348:900–907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP (1996) Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. BJOG 103:154–161

    Google Scholar 

  12. Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF (2001) Anal incontinence in primiparas. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 23:321–326

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fynes M, Donnelly VS, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C (1998) Cesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury. Obstet Gynecol 92:496–500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M (1985) Fecal incontinence due to external anal sphincter division in childbirth is associated with damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor musculature; a double pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92:824–828

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M (2002) Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ 166:326–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Chir M, Thomas JM, Bartram CI (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329:1905–1911

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Need JA (1987) Is “the trial of forceps”over? Med J Aust 146:613

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Farrell SA (2002) Cesarean section versus forceps-assisted vaginal birth: It’s time to include pelvic injury in the risk-benefit equation. CMAJ 166:337–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Faden RR, Becker C, Lewis C, Freeman J, Faden AI (1981) Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Med Care 19:718–733

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Louis University Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, Division of Urogynecology, St. Mary’s Hospital, St. Louis University School of Medicine, 6420 Clayton Rd, Suite 290, St. Louis, MO, 63117, USA

    Mary T. McLennan, Clifford F. Melick, Beverly Alten, Jacqueline Young & Melanie R. Hoehn

Authors
  1. Mary T. McLennan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clifford F. Melick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beverly Alten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacqueline Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Melanie R. Hoehn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary T. McLennan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLennan, M.T., Melick, C.F., Alten, B. et al. Patients’ knowledge of potential pelvic floor changes associated with pregnancy and delivery. Int Urogynecol J 17, 22–26 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1325-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1325-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation