Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative inhibition by bilastine and cetirizine of histamine-induced wheal and flare responses in humans

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Inflammation Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective and design

Comparison of bilastine and cetirizine in inhibiting skin wheal and flare responses over 24 h.

Subjects

Twenty-one healthy male volunteers (aged 19–44 years).

Treatment and methods

Volunteers were randomised to receive single oral doses of 20 or 50 mg bilastine, 10 mg cetirizine or placebo before provocation of wheal and flare responses to 100 mg/ml histamine by skin prick 1.5, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h later.

Results

There were no significant differences between overall inhibitions of wheal or flare by 20 mg bilastine and 10 mg cetirizine. Bilastine was faster in onset than cetirizine, inhibitions of wheal and flare at 1.5 h being 89 ± 3 versus 44 ± 14% (P = 0.011) and 85 ± 4 versus 45 ± 14% (P = 0.016), respectively (Student’s t test). At 1.5 h, both wheals and flares were inhibited by >70% in 11/12 volunteers taking bilastine and 3/11 taking cetirizine (P = 0.003, Fisher’s exact test). There were no significant differences between the drugs at later times. Bilastine 50 mg had a longer duration of action than bilastine 20 mg.

Conclusions

Both 20 mg bilastine and 10 mg cetirizine are effective and of long duration in reducing histamine-induced wheal and flare responses, the major difference between the two drugs being the more rapid onset of action of bilastine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen). Allergy. 2008;63(Suppl 86):8–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clough GF, Boutsiouki P, Church MK. Comparison of the effects of levocetirizine and loratadine on histamine-induced wheal, flare, and itch in human skin. Allergy. 2001;56(10):985–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Denham KJ, Boutsiouki P, Clough GF, Church MK. Comparison of the effects of desloratadine and levocetirizine on histamine-induced wheal, flare and itch in human skin. Inflamm Res. 2003;52(10):424–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Purohit A, Melac M, Pauli G, Frossard N. Twenty-four-hour activity and consistency of activity of levocetirizine and desloratadine in the skin. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56(4):388–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Darsow U, Ring J, Scharein E, Bromm B. Correlations between histamine-induced wheal, flare and itch. Arch Dermatol Res. 1996;288(8):436–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar P, Shen Q, Pivetti CD, Lee ES, Wu MH, Yuan SY. Molecular mechanisms of endothelial hyperpermeability: implications in inflammation. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2009;11:e19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Entrican JH, Simpson JG, Stalker AL. The effects of histamine and bradykinin on the post-capillary venule. J Pathol. 1971;104(3):3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raud J. Intravital microscopic studies on acute mast cell-dependent inflammation. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1989;578:1–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glyn MC, Lawrenson JG, Ward BJ, Clark P. Rho kinase-mediated reduction in cardiac capillary endothelial cell dimensions, in situ, against flow. Microcirculation. 2008;28:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmelz M, Michael K, Weidner C, Schmidt R, Torebjork HE, Handwerker HO. Which nerve fibers mediate the axon reflex flare in human skin? Neuroreport. 2000;11(3):645–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmelz M. A neural pathway for itch. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4(1):9–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Corcostegui R, Labeaga L, Innerarity A, Berisa A, Orjales A. Preclinical pharmacology of bilastine, a new selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist: receptor selectivity and in vitro antihistaminic activity. Drugs R D. 2005;6(6):371–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Corcostegui R, Labeaga L, Innerarity A, Berisa A, Orjales A. In vivo pharmacological characterisation of bilastine, a potent and selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist. Drugs R D. 2006;7(4):219–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zuberbier T, Oanta A, Bogacka E, Medina I, Wesel F, Uhl P, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs levocetirizine 5 mg for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Allergy. 2010;65(4):516–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Horak F, Zieglmayer P, Zieglmayer R, Lemell P. The effects of bilastine compared with cetirizine, fexofenadine, and placebo on allergen-induced nasal and ocular symptoms in patients exposed to aeroallergen in the Vienna Challenge Chamber. Inflamm Res. 2010;59(5):391–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuna P, Bachert C, Nowacki Z, van Cauwenberge P, Agache I, Fouquert L, et al. Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39(9):1338–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bachert C, Kuna P, Sanquer F, Ivan P, Dimitrov V, Gorina MM, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients. Allergy. 2009;64(1):158–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jauregizar N, de la Fuente L, Lucero ML, Sologuren A, Leal N, Rodriguez M. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the antihistaminic H1-effect of bilastine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(8):543–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Staevska M, Popov TA, Kralimarkova T, Lazarova C, Kraeva S, Popova D, et al. The effectiveness of levocetirizine and desloratadine in up to four-times conventional doses in difficult-to-treat urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:676–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zuberbier T, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Walter CG, Church MK, Gimenez-Arnau AM, et al. EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: management of urticaria. Allergy. 2009;64(10):1427–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gillard M, Van Der Perren PC, Moguilevsky N, Massingham R, Chatelain P. Binding characteristics of cetirizine and levocetirizine to human H1 histamine receptors: contribution of Lys191 and Thr194. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;61(2):391–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Church MK. Safety and efficacy of bilastine: a new H1-antihistamine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria. Expert Opin Drug Safety. 2011;10:779–93.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schinkel AH. P-Glycoprotein, a gatekeeper in the blood-brain barrier. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1999;36(2–3):179–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen C, Hanson E, Watson JW, Lee JS. P-glycoprotein limits the brain penetration of nonsedating but not sedating H1-antagonists. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003;31(3):312–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Drs. D. McLaverty, A.J. Stewart and B. Colgan of MDS Pharma Services (Belfast, Northern Ireland), and Román Valiente (Faes Farma SA, Department of Research and Development, Department of Clinical Research, Leioa, Spain) for their valuable comments and advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin K. Church.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Andras Falus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Church, M.K. Comparative inhibition by bilastine and cetirizine of histamine-induced wheal and flare responses in humans. Inflamm. Res. 60, 1107–1112 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-011-0373-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-011-0373-y

Keywords

Navigation