Abstract
Economic Botany 47(2)202-205. 1993. The contention that objects in the hands of male and female deities sculpted on the exterior of the Kesav Temple at Somnathpur near the city of Mysore, Karnataka State, India, represent maize ears is rejected on linguistic, religious, sculptural, archaeological, agricultural, and botanical grounds. The stone inscriptions associated with the temple list items or commodities used in worship, maize is not included. We find no evidence for maize figuring in any kind of religious ritual or worship. The word for maize used currently in the Kannada language is “Musukin Jola” which refers to a kind of millet resembling sorghum (“jola”). This appellation is of recent origin and does not appear in any literary work contemporary with the period of construction of Somnathpur temple. The wall images do not fully simulate in form and proportion the actual human figures. The beaded ornamentation, likewise, of the hand-held object shows considerable variation and its comparison whether on qualitative or quantitative basis with actual maize kernels of both primitive and modern maize is inappropriate. The variation inform and proportion and stylistic features of these objects is ascribed to their being the work of different sculptors. Maize now grown near the temple comprises modern cultivars, especially hybrids released during the early 1960’s. It is inconceivable that none of the primitive and advanced types of maize purported to be represented in the temple sculpture would have been considered worthy of cultivation from the thirteenth century to the present time. We hold that these temple sculptures do not represent maize or its ear but an imaginary fruit bearing pearls known in Sanskrit as “Muktaphala.”
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Annual Report. 1932. Archaeological Survey of Mysore, Somnathpur, pp. 16–39. Department of Archaeology, Government of Mysore.
Birdwood, G. C. M. 1880. The arts of India, reprinted by Rupa and Co., New Delhi, in 1988.
Johannessen, C. I. 1988. Indian maize in the twelfth century B.C. Nature 332:587.
Johannessen, C. L., and A. Z. Parker. 1989. Maize ears sculptured in 12th and 13th Century A.D. India as indicators of Pre-Columbian diffusion. Economic Botany 43:164–180.
Mangelsdorf, P. C. 1974. Corn: Its origin, evolution and improvement. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
—,and C. E. Smith. 1949. New archaeological evidence on evolution in maize. Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University 13:213–247.
Payak, M. M. 1975. Epidemiology of maize downy mildews with special reference to those occurring in Asia. Tropical Agriculture Research Center Series 8:81–91.
—,and J. K. S. Sachan. 1988. Maize in Somnathpur, an Indian mediaeval temple. Nature 335: 773–774.
Sachan, J. K. S., K. R. Sarkar, and M. M. Payak. 1982. Studies on distribution of constitutive heterochromatin in relation to origin, evolution and diffusion of maize. Pages 41–48in R. B. Singh, R. M. Singh, and B. D. Singh, eds., Advances in cytogenetics and crop improvement. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
Singh, B. 1977. Races of maize in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Veena, T., and N. Sigamani. 1991. Do objects in friezes of Somnathpur temple (1268 AD) in South India represent maize ears. Current Science 61:395–396.
Wellhausen, E. J., L. M. Roberts, and E. Hernandez. 1951. Races of maize in Mexico. Bussey Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Payak, M.M., Sachan, J.K.S. Maize ears not sculpted in 13th century Somnathpur temple in India. Econ Bot 47, 202–205 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862023
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862023