Abstract
The family Hydrocharitaceae, with 15 genera and ca. 80 species, shows a remarkable morphological diversity which presumably developed as an adaptation to their aquatic habitat. This is particularly true in the case of the many different kinds of pollination mechanisms. To gather more basic information regarding the adaptive evolution of Hydrocharitaceae, we have carried out a phylogenetic analysis based on the sequences of therbcL andmatK. Our resulting neighbor-joining distance tree provides the following insights: (1) none of the previous classification systems were supported by molecular phylogenetic tree; (2) Najas (Najadaceae), which has never been included in Hydrocharitaceae except in Shaffer-Fehre's (1991) system based on seed coat structures, is an ingroup of Hydrocharitaceae; (3) Limnocharitaceae and Alismataceae are sister groups of Hydrocharitaceae; (4) the three marine genera,Halophila, Enhalus andThalassia, are monophyletic; and (5) a peculiar pollination mechanism specific to Hydrocharitaceae (Hydrocharitaceae-epihydrophily), underwent a parallel evolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adachi, J. andHasegawa, M. 1996. MOLPHY: Programs for Molecular Phylogenetics, ver. 2.3. Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo.
Ancibor, E. 1979. Systematic anatomy of vegetative organs of Hydrocharitaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.78: 237–266.
Ascherson, P. andGurke, M. 1889. Hydrocharitaceae.In A. Engler and K. Prantl, eds., Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 1. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 238–258.
Cao, Y., Adachi, J., Janke, A., Paabo, S. andHasegawa, M. 1994a. Phylogenetic relationships among Eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: instability of s tree based on a single gene. J. Mol. Evol.39: 519–527.
Cao, Y., Adachi, J., Yano, T. andHasegawa, M. 1994b. Phylogenetic place of guinea pigs: no support of the Rodent-polyphyly hypothesis from Maximum-Likelihood analyses of multiple protein sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol.11: 593–604.
Chase, M.W., Soltis, D.E., Olmstead, R.G., Morgan, D., Les, D.H., Mishler, B.D., Duvall, M.R., Price, R.A., Hills, H.G., Qiu, Y.-L., Kron, K.A., Rettigg, J.H., Michaels, H.J., Kress, W.J., Karol, K.G., Clark, W.D., Hedren, M., Gaut, B.S., Jansen, R.K., Kim, K.-J., Wimpee, C.F., Smith, J.F., Furnier, G.R., Strauss, S.H., Xiang, Q.-Y., Plunkett, G.M., Soltis, P.S., Swensen, S.M., Williams, S.E., Gadek, P.A., Quinn, C.J., Eguiarte, L.E., Golenberg, E., Learn, G.H., Graham, S.W., Barrett, S.C.H., Dayanandan, S. andAlbert, V.A. 1993 Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–580.
Cook, C.D.K. 1982. Pollination mechanisms in the Hydrocharitaceae.In J.J. Symoens, S.S. Hooper and P. Compere, eds. Studies on Aquatic Vascular Plants, Royal Botanical Society of Belgium, Brussels, pp. 1–15.
Cook, C.D.K. andLuond, R. 1982. A revision of the genusNechamandra (Hydrocharitaceae). Aquat. Bot.13: 505–513.
Cox, P.A. 1983. Search theory, random motion, and the convergent evolution of pollen and spore morphology in aquatic plans. Am. Nat.121: 9–31.
Cox, P.A. 1988. Hydrophilous pollination. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.19: 261–280.
Cox, P.A. 1991. Abiotic pollination: an evolutionary escape for animal-pollinated angiosperms. Phill. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B333:217–224.
Cox, P.A. andTomlinson, P.B. 1988. Pollination ecology of a seagrass,Thalassia testudinum (Hydrocharitaceae). in St. Croix. Amer. J. Bot.75: 958–965.
Dahlgren, R.M.T. 1985. The Families of the Monocytyledons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Eckhardt, T. 1964. Monocotyledonae 1. Reihe Helobiae.In H. Melchior, ed., A. Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 12th edn, Borntraeger, Berlin, pp. 499–512.
Engler, A. 1904. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Edn. IV. Wihelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Ernst-schwarzenbach, M. 1945. Zur Blutenbiologie einiger Hydrocharitaceen. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.55: 33–69.
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution39: 783–791.
Felsenstein, J. 1993. Phylogeny inference Package (PHYLIP) version 3.5c. University of Washington, Seattle.
Felsentein, J. andKishino, H. 1993. Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? A reply to Hills and Bull. Syst. Biol.42: 193–200.
Hasebe, M., Omori, T., Nakazawa, M., Sano, T., Kato, M. andIwatsuki, K. 1994.rbcL gene sequences provide evidence for the evolutionary lineages of leptosporangiate ferns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91: 5730–5734.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H. andYano, T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol.22: 160–174.
Hutchinson, J. 1959. The Families of Flowering Plants. 2: Monocotyledons. 2nd edn. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Johnson, L.A., Schultz, J.L., Soltis, D.E. andSoltis, P.A. 1996. Monophyly and generic relationships of Polemoniaceae based onmatK sequences. Amer. J. Bot.83: 1207–1224.
Johnson, L.A. andSoltis, D.E. 1994.matK sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragacae s. s.. Syst. Bot.19: 143–156.
Johnson, L.A. andSoltis, D.E. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto andGilia (Polemoniaceae) usingmatK sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 149–175.
Kadono, Y. 1994. Aquatic Plants of Japan. Buń-ichi Sogo Shuppan, Co., Ltd, Tokyo.
Kaul, R.B. 1968. Floral morphology and phylogeny in the Hydrocharitaceae. Phytomorphology18: 13–35.
Kaul, R.B. 1969. Morphology and development of the flowers ofBootia cordata, Ottelia alismoides, and their synthetic hybrid (Hydrocharitaceae). Amer. J. Bot.56: 951–959.
Kaul, R.B. 1970. Evolution and adaptation of inflorescences in the Hydrocharitaceae. Amer. J. Bot.57: 708–715.
Kimura, M. 1980. A simple for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol.16: 111–120.
Kishino, H., Miyata, T. andHasegawa, M. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny, and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol.31: 151–160.
Les, D.H., Garvin, D.K. andWimpee, C.F. 1993. Phylogenetic studies in the monocot subclass Alismatidae: evidence for a reappraisal of the aquatic order Najadales. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.2: 304–314.
Les, D.H. andHaynes, R.R. 1995. Systematics of subclass Alismatidae: a systhesis of approaches.In P.J. Rudall, P.J. Cribb, D.F. Culter and C.J. Humphries, eds., Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 353–377.
Maddison, W.P. andMaddison, D.R. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
Maier, R.M., Neckermann, K., Igloi, G.L. andKossel, H. 1995. Complete sequence of the maize chroloplast genome: gene content, hotspots of divergence and fine tuning of genetic information by transcript editing. J. Mol. Biol.251: 614–628.
McConchie, C.A. 1983. Floral development ofMaidenia rubra Rendle (Hydrocharitaceae). Aust. J. Bot.31: 585–603.
Miki, S. 1937. The origin ofNajas andPotamogeton. Bot. Mag. Tokyo51: 472–480.
Palmer, J.D. 1986. Isolation and structural analysis of chroloplast DNA. Methods in Enzymology118: 167–186.
Pettitt, J.M. 1980. Reproduction in seagrasses: Nature of the pollen and receptive surface of the stigma in the Hydrocharitaceae. Ann. Bot.45: 257–272.
Saitou, N. andNei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol.4: 406–425.
Sculthorpe, C.D. 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold, London.
Shaffer-Fehre, M. 1991a The endotegmen tuberculae: an account of little-known structures from the seed coat of the Hydrocharitoideae (Hydrocharitaceae) andNajas (Najadaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc.107: 169–188.
Shaffer-Fehre, M. 1991b The position ofNajas within the subclass Alismatidae (Monocotyledones) in the light of new evidence from seed coat structures in the Hydrocharitoideae (Hydrocharitaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc.107: 189–209.
Shinozaki, K., Ohme, M., Tanaka, M., Wakasugi, T., Hayashida, N., Matsubayashi, T., Zaita, N., Chunwongse, J., Obokata, J., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Ohto, C., Torazawa, K., Meng, B, Y., Sugita, M., Deno, H., Kamogashira, T., Yamada, K., Kusuda, J., Takaiwa, F., Kato, A., Tohdoh, N., Shimada, H. andSugiura, M. 1986. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: Its gene organization and expression. EMBO J.5: 2043–2049.
Singh, V. 1965. Morphological and anatomical studies in Helobiae. III. Vascular anatomy of the node and flower of Najadaceae. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B.61: 98–108.
Soltis, D.E., Kuzoff, R.E., Conti, E., Gornall, R. andFerguson, K. 1996.matK andrbcL gene sequence data indicate thatSaxifraga (saxifragaceae) is polyphyletic. Amer. J. Bot.83: 371–382.
Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Clegg, M.T. andDurbin, M. 1990.rbcL sequence and chroloplast divergence and phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.87: 4640–4644.
Takhtajan, A. 1966. Systema et Phylogenia Magnoliophytorum. Nauka, Moscow.
Tomlinson, P. B. 1982. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons VII. Helobiae (Alismatidae). Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tanaka, N., Setoguchi, H. & Murata, J. Phylogeny of the family hydrocharitaceae inferred fromrbcL andmatK gene sequence data. J. Plant Res. 110, 329–337 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02524931
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02524931