Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of oxygen heterocyclic compounds in citrus essential oils by capillary electrochromatography and comparison with HPLC

  • Originals
  • Electrochromatography
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A new method for the analysis of oxygen heterocyclic compounds in bergamot, mandarin and sweet organge oils by capillary electrochromatography (CEC) is reported. The fused silica capillaries employed were slurry-packed in house with 3 μm ODS1 stationary phase. The repeatability of the technique has been investigated with two neutral standard mixtures. Conditions for the analysis have been optimised by varying several parameters such as applied voltage, temperature, composition of the buffer and percentage of organic solvent. The best separations were obtained using the buffer acetonitrile/TRIS 10 mM at pH 7.8 in the ratio 80∶20. The results were compared with those obtained by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in terms of time of analysis, resolution and efficiency. A study on the behaviour of oxygen heterocyclic compounds analysed with a “non-aqueous” mobile phase has also been carried out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dugo, P.; Mondello, L.; Stagno d'Alcontres, I.; Cavazza, A.; Dugo, G.Perfum Flavor. 1997,22, 25–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dugo, P.; Mondello, L.; Cogliandro, E.; Stagno d' Alcontres, I.; Cotroneo, A.Flav. Fragr. J. 1994,9, 105–111.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benavente-Garcia, O.; Castillo, J.; Marin, F.R.; Ortuno, A.; Del Rio, J.A.J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997,45, 4505–4515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Manthey, J.A.; Grohmann, K.; Montanari, A.; Ash, K.; Manthey, C.L.J. Nat. Prod. 1999,62, 441–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bianchini, J.P.; Gaydou, E.M.J. Charatogr. 1980,190, 233–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bianchini, J.P.; Gaydou, E.M.J. Chromatogr. 1981,211, 61–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ziegler, H.; Spiteller, G.Flav. Fragr. J. 1992,7, 129–139.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ting, S.V.; Rouseff, R.L.; Dougherty, M.H.; Attaway, J.A.J. Food. Sci. 1979,44, 69–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bianchini, J.P.; Gaydou, E.M.; Siouffi, A.M.; Mazerolles, G.; Mathieu, D.; Phan Tan Luu, R.Chromatographia 1987,23, 15–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rouseff, R.L.; Ting, S.V.J. Chromatogr. 1979,176, 75–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dugo, P.; Mondello, L.; Sebastiani, E.; Ottana', R., Errante, G.; Dugo, G.J. Liq. Chrom. and Rel. Technol. 1999,22, 2991–3005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dugo, P.; Mondello, L.; Dugo, G.; Heaton, D.M.; Bartle, K.D.; Clifford, A.; Myers, P.J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996,44, 3900–3905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dermaux, A.; Sandra, P.Electrophoresis 1999,20, 3027–3065.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cikalo, M.G.; Bartle, K.D.; Robson, M.M.; Myers, P.; Euerby, M.R.Analyst 1998,123, 87R-102R.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartle, K.D.; Myers, P.Chem. Br. 1998,34, 42–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dittmann, M.M.; Wienand, K.; Bek, F.; Rozing, G.P.LC-GC 1995,13, 800–808.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Euerby, M.R.; Gilligan, D.; Johnson, C.M.; Roulin, S.C.P.; Myers, P.; Bartle, K.D. J. Microcol. Sep.1997,9, 373–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roulin, S.; Myers, P.; Bartle, K.D.; Euerby, M.R.; Johnson, C.J. Chromatogr., in press.

  19. Robson, M.M.; Cikalo, M.G.; Myers, P.; Euerby, M.R.; Bartle, K.D.J. Microcol. Sep. 1997,9, 357–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boughtflower, R.J.; Underwood, T.; Paterson, C.J.Chromatographia 1995,40, 329–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dugo, P.; Mondello, L.; Dugo, L.; Stancanelli, R.; Dugo, G.J. Pharm. and Biom. Anal. 2000,24, 147–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuhn, R.; Hoffstetter-Kuhn, S.Capillary electrophoresis: principles and practice, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany,1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dittmann, M.M.; Rozing, G.P.J. Microcol. Sep. 1997,9, 399–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cikalo, M.G.; Bartle, K.D.; Myers, P.J. Chromatogr. 1999,836, 35–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Banholczer, A.; Pyell, U.J. Chromatogr. 2000,869, 363–374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonaccorsi, I.; Dugo, G.; McNair, H.M.; Dugo, P.Ital. J. Food Sci. 2000,12, in press.

  27. Wen, E.; Asiaie, R.; Horváth, Cs.J. Chromatogr. A 1999,855, 349–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, D.; Remcho, V.T.J. Microcol. Sep. 1997,9, 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sandra, P.; Dermaux, A.; Ferraz, V.; Dittmann, M.M.; Rozing, G.J. Microcol. Sep. 1997,9, 409–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cavazza, A., Bartle, K.D., Dugo, P. et al. Analysis of oxygen heterocyclic compounds in citrus essential oils by capillary electrochromatography and comparison with HPLC. Chromatographia 53, 57–62 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492428

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492428

Key Words

Navigation