Summary
All operationalized diagnostic systems contain a diagnostic category, which corresponds to the concept of major depression. Yet, these corresponding definitions are not identical. Up to now, no comprehensive comparisons of the competing diagnoses have been published. We will therefore present a series of studies, describing six different operational definitions of major depression according to their content and construction and empirically comparing them in large inpatient and outpatient samples. This first paper presents a descriptive comparison of the definitions given in the Feighner Diagnostic Criteria, the Research Diagnostic Criteria, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition and third edition, revised, and in two developmental drafts of the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for research (draft April 1987–187; draft April 1989–189). The descriptive comparison will demonstrate that there are many similarities, especially concerning the symptom-criteria of major depression. Classificatory relevance could only be assumed for those differences found for cut-offs, for time criteria and especially for exclusion criteria. Whether these differences are negligible and whether patients classified by different diagnostic systems are really comparable will be examined in subsequent publications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn (DSM-III). APA, Washington, D.C.
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and Mental Disorders, 3rd edn, revised (DSM-III-R). APA, Washington, D.C.
Berner P, Gabriel E, Katschnig H, Kieffer W, Koehler K, Lenz G, Simhandl C (1983) Diagnostic criteria for schizophrenic and affective psychoses. World Psychiatric Association, Vienna
Cassidy WL, Flanagan N, Spellman M, Cohen M (1957) Clinical observation in manic depressive disease: a quantitative study of 100 manic depressive patients and 50 medically sick controls. J Am Med Ass 164:1535–1546
Feighner JP (1981) Nosology of primary affective disorders and application to clinical research. Acta Psychiatr Scand 63 [Suppl 190]:29–41
Feighner JP, Robins E, Guze SB, Woodruff RA, Winokur G, Munoz R (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 26:57–63
Maier W, Philipp M (1986) Construct validity of the DSM-III and RDC classification of melancholia (endogeneous depression). J Psychiatr Res 20:289–299
Philipp M, Delmo CD (1988) Outpatient-version of the Polydiagnostic Interview. Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz
Philipp M, Frommberger U (1985) The Polydiagnostic Follow-Up Interview: a structured interview for conducting polydiagnostic orientated prospective follow-up studies. Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz
Philipp M, Maier W (1985) Operational diagnosis of endogenous depression. I. Comparison with clinical diagnosis. Pharmacopsychiatry 18:114–115
Philipp M, Maier W (1986) The Polydiagnostic Interview: a structured interview for polydiagnostic classification of psychiatric patients. Psychopathology 19:175–185
Philipp M, Maier W (1987) Diagnosensysteme endogene Depressionen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Philipp M, Maier W, Benkert O (1985) Operational diagnosis of endogenous depression. II. Comparison of 8 different operational diagnoses. Psychopathology 18:218–225
Spitzer R, Endicott J, Robins E (1978) Research Diagnostic Criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35: 773–782
World Health Organisation (1987) April 1987 draft of the ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research, chapt V: mental and behavioral disorders (F00-F99). WHO, Geneva
World Health Organisation (1989) April 1989 draft of the ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research, chapt V: mental and behavioral disorders (F00-F99). WHO, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Philipp, M., Maier, W. & Delmo, C.D. The concept of major depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Nuerosci 240, 258–265 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189537
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189537