Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding the means and objects of addiction: Technology, the internet, and gambling

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes how using new computer technology and the Internet for gambling can represent both the means and object of addiction. However, these technological factors do not represent the cause of addictive behavior. Given the widespread availability of computer technology and the remarkable expansion of the Internet, it is not surprising, however, that these technological advances have become associated with intemperate gambling activities. By discussing the concept of addiction and its associated social setting, neurochemistry, and gaming characteristics, this article suggests that addiction is the result of shifts in subjective experience and that new technology and the Internet can provide relatively reliable and potent contemporary vehicles for changing emotional states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benjamin, J., Lin, L., Patterson, C., Greenberg, B. D., Murphy, D. L., & Hammer, D. H. (1996). Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty seeking.Nature Genetics, 12(January), 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, W. M. (1995, August 16). Feeling Luck? Electronics is bringing gambling into homes, restaurants and planes.Wall Street Journal, pp. 1, A7.

  • Chapman, G. (1996). The Internet: Promise and peril in cyberspace. InMicrosoft Encarta96 Encyclopedia. Redmond, CA: Microsoft Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtwright, D. T. (1982).Dark paradise. Opiate addiction in America before 1940. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebstein, R. P., Novick, O., Umansky, R., Priel, B., Osher, Y., Blaine, D., Bennett, E. R., Nemanov, L., Katz, M., & Belmaker, R. H. (1996). Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of novelty seeking.Nature Genetics, 12(January), 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. (1989). Confession of a low roller. In R. Atwan (Ed.),The best American essays 1989 (pp. 98–113). New York: Ticknor & Fields.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, S.E. (1994). Why does the brain prefer opium to broccoli?Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 2, 43–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, S.E., & Nestler, E.J. (1993).The molecular foundations of psychiatry. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabs, C. (1996, May 21). Fatal distraction?HOMEPC, 3, 66–70, 76, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. (1989). A general theory of addictions: rationale for and evidence supporting a new approach for understanding and treating addictive behaviors. In Shaffer, H.J., Stein, S., Gambino, B., & Cummings, T. N. (Eds.).Compulsive gambling: theory, research & practice, (pp. 36–64). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt, G.A. (1988). Matching clients to treatment: treatment models and stages of change. In Donovan, D.M. & Marlatt, G.A. (Eds.)Assessment of addictive behaviors, (pp. 474–484). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt, G.A., Baer, J.S., Dovovan, D.M., & Kivlahan, D.R. (1988). Addictive behaviors: Etiology and treatment.Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 223–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, H.B., & Sunderwirth, S.G. (1987).Craving for ecstasy: the consciousness & chemistry of escape. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B. (1996). Computer addictions entangle students.The APA Monitor, 27(6), 3839.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Attorneys General. (1996, May/June). Executive summary of Internet gambling report.NAAG Gaming Developments Bulletin, 12.

  • O'neill, M. (1995, March 8). The lure and addiction of life on line.The New York Times, pp. C1, C6.

  • Reuters News Service. (1992, November 25). Cigarette shortage in Italy draws tobacconist protest.Boston Globe.

  • Shaffer, H.J. (1996). Conceptual crises and the addictions: a philosophy of science perspective.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 3, 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J. (1987). The assessment and diagnosis of addictive disorders: The use of clinical reflection and hypotheses testing.Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 4, 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J. (1992). The psychology of stage change: the transition from addiction to recovery, in J.H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R.B. Millman (Eds.),Comprehensive Textbook of Substance Abuse-2nd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J. (1993). Denial, ambivalence and countertransference hate, in J.D. Levin & R. Weiss (Eds.),Alcoholism: Dynamics and Treatment. Northdale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc., 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J. (in press). The most important unresolved issue in the addictions: conceptual chaos.International Journal of the Addictions.

  • Shaffer, H.J. & Burglass, M.E. (Eds.) (1981).Classic contributions in the addictions. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J., & Gambino, B. (1983). Addiction Paradigms III: From Theory-Research to Practice and Back.Advance in Alcohol and Substance Abuse, 3, 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J., & Robbins, M. (1991). Manufacturing multiple meanings of addiction: time-limited realities,Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 13(5), 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J., & Robbins, M. (1995). Psychotherapy for Addictive Behaviors: A Stage Change Approach to Meaning Making, in A. M. Washton (Ed.),Psychotherapy and Substance Abuse: A Practitioner's Handbook. New York: Guilford Publications, 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J., Hall, M.N., Walsh, J.S., & Vander Bilt, J. (1995). The psychosocial consequences of gambling. In R. Tannenwald (Ed.),Casino development: How would casinos affect New England's economy. Special Report No. 2. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, I., & Dickerson, M. (1981). Cessation of high frequency gambling and “withdrawal” symptoms.British Journal of Addiction, 76, 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinberg, N.E. (1984).Drug, set, and setting: the basis for controlled intoxicant use. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinberg, N. E., & Fraser, K. M. (1979). The role of the social setting in the prevention and treatment of alcoholism. In J. Mendelson & N. Mello (Eds.),The Diagnosis & Treatment of Alcoholism (pp. 359–385). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Special thanks are extended to Joni Vander Bilt, Matthew Hall, and Gregory O'Donohue for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaffer, H.J. Understanding the means and objects of addiction: Technology, the internet, and gambling. J Gambling Stud 12, 461–469 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539189

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539189

Keywords

Navigation